Write a business report concept about Restaurant, Café, and Bar include 1) Who are your potential customers? What characteristics do your customers have? 2) Market size: how big is your potential market? What percentage of the overall market can you grab? What are the assumptions of your estimation? What are the sources of your data? You must cite appropriately and give complete references. 4) Identify some major players in the industry including direct competitors, indirect competitors, and future competitors if you can identify any. 5) Discuss briefly the advantages and disadvantages of your major competitors. You can use perceptual mapping method or competitive analysis grid to do a comparison. 6) How will you position yourself in the industry? What are your unique advantages? Seldom an idea/business does not have any competitor, so the important thing is how you can identify the uniqueness of your product or service. Why do customers like your product/service? What specific benefits or advantages can you provide comparing with your competitors? What is the industry structure look like?
The main hypothetical viewpoint in humanism is called Functional Analysis. Useful Analysis is the hypothesis that society is comprised of various parts that team up to advance solidarity and balance. Useful Analysis is here and there alluded to as "functionalism and auxiliary functionalism" (Henslin, 2012, p. 24). Auguste Comte and Herbert Spencer, both remarkable sociologists, built up this hypothesis since they trusted society is comparative as living life forms. By contrasting society with living life forms and their organs, Comte and Spencer presumed that all together for a people or creatures to work appropriately, their organs must cooperate. For this situation, with the goal for society to be prosperous, individuals must function as a group to get it going. Emile Durkheim saw nothing unique about Comte and Spencer's judgment. He likewise focused on the possibility that society is comprised of numerous parts that cooperates to "satisfy their capacities" (Henslin, 2012, p. 25). What contrasts Durkheim from Comte and Herbert is that he recognized society as being "typical" (Henslin, 2012, p. 25) if each piece of society is cooperating as a group. In the event that society does not team up, at that point it is regarded an "anomalous or neurotic state" (Henslin, 2012, p. 25). Robert Merton built up a scale to gauge the results of individuals' activity in a general public. In the event that a man accomplishes something that is deliberate to society, it is known as a show work. In the event that a man accomplishes something that isn't intended to enable society to transform, it is known as an inert capacity. A negative outcome that makes harm society is known as a brokenness. At the point when functionalists direct their exploration, it is essential that they target huge gatherings, for example, ventures, associations, or structures in light of the fact that Functional Analysis is a large scale examination. Full scale level examination is as far as anyone knows intended to target "vast scale designs in the public arena" (Henslin, 2012, p. 28). Circumstances that draw in functionalists' consideration can incorporate "how the parts of society fit together to make the entire and what each part does, and how it adds to society" (Henslin, 2012, p. 25). Useful Analysis is critical in light of the fact that this is the region that enables sociologists to inspect and clarify social marvels that can have a positive or negative effect. The second hypothetical point of view of human science is the Conflict Theory. The Conflict Theory is the possibility that society is made of various gatherings that contend each other for rare assets. The Industrial Revolution that changed Europe has incited humanist Karl Marx to build up this point of view on social life. Marx trusts that in a general public, a higher class amass exists and controls the lower class. As indicated by humanist Lewis Coser, he trusts "strife is destined to create among individuals who are in cozy connections" (Henslin, 2012, p. 27). Along these lines, if a negative change happens in the game plan on how power or benefit is appropriated in their general public, it could prompt clashes. Struggle scholars additionally centers around extensive gatherings when directing exploration since Conflict Theory is a full scale examination. They target structures, gatherings, nations, and even societies. The quality of the Conflict Theory is that it permits struggle scholars to analyze the difference in a condition and comprehend the contention that goes along. This permits better comprehension on why occasions, for example, challenges, happen in the public eye today. At the point when struggle scholars lead inquire about, they take a gander at "how restricting interest go through each layer of society" (Henslin, 2012, p. 27) or what causes imbalance in a general public. What additionally gains their consideration is the point at which they attempt to see how the privileged controls their capacity on the lower class. The third hypothetical point of view in human science is called Symbolic Interactionism. Emblematic Interactionism is the hypothesis that society utilizes images that have importance to speak with each other and to comprehend their general surroundings. Sociologists, George Herbert Mead and Charles Cooley, collaborated to plan this hypothesis to all the more likely comprehend our social life. Emblematic Interactionism is viewed as a small scale examination. Miniaturized scale investigation includes a little gathering while inspecting how an individual uses images to convey and cooperate in the public eye. The Conflict Theory is vital on the grounds that it helps strife interactionists "break down how social life relies upon the manners in which we characterize ourselves as well as other people" (Henslin, 2012, p. 23). Since Symbolic Interactionism centers around an individual and their cooperation with others, this could help lead them to comprehend social request and change in a general public. What draws in strife interactionalists is the point at which they inspect "how individuals bode well out of life and their place in it" (Henslin, 2012, p. 23). They take a gander at how every general public dresses contrastingly or how every social request is unique. In particular, they may think that its fascinating on how images, regardless of having diverse significance in each general public, makes social life. I will apply the hypothetical viewpoints of humanism to the Dakota Pipeline Protest, an occasion that has been influencing a general public in the U.S. While applying Functional Analysis to the Dakota Pipeline Protest, analysts would initially need to realize what the show capacity of the Dakota pipeline is. The show capacity of the Dakota pipeline venture is to fabricate a 1,200-mile-long pipeline, from North Dakota to Illinois, that will transport around 470,000 barrels of raw petroleum every day. This is viewed as the most secure approach to transport unrefined petroleum with respect to ecological concerns. The Researchers may likewise be keen on the dysfunctions of the pipeline. The brokenness of the venture is that the pipeline is anticipated to go under Lake Oahe. Any crack from the pipeline could cause a gigantic ecological impact. Specialists would likewise be interested about the coordinators. They should seriously mull over scrutinizing their purpose behind presenting the task, and in addition the advantage of the pipeline. The coordinator of the Dakota pipeline, Energy Transfer Partner LP, is the organization that needs to take part in this business of transporting oil. They got the endorsement to push forward with the task since it is the most secure and the most ecological cordial approach to transport oil. At last, scientists may likewise need to look at what the conceivable inert elements of this undertaking will be. A conceivable inert capacity of the venture is that it can bring down fuel costs in the U.S. also, cause a lift in the economy. This can likewise prompt ease on power bills or air passages. While applying Conflict Theory to the Dakota Pipeline Protest, scientists may need to initially look at who is the high and low class. The high class in this occasion would be the Government authorities and in addition the coordinators of the venture. The low class would be viewed as the gathering that opposes the development of the Dakota pipeline. For this situation, the low class would be the Native American clans from everywhere throughout the United States. Analysts would likewise look at what is the reason to the imbalance that is occurring. As indicated by the Native Americans, they have been living in the zone where the pipeline is anticipated to go over. The Government does not consider the way this is a holy region for them and that Lake Oahe is life for them. Lake Oahe gives them their every day water supply and they emphatically trust water is life. Specialists would likewise be interested about what else the Native Americans are endeavoring to ensure and for what reason do regardless they have the enthusiasm to continue dissenting, notwithstanding the physical maltreatment from the Government. Other than the water, the Native Americans have progenitors who were covered around the territory. It is irritating for them to observe a development going ahead in the territory that is profitable since their precursors. At last, clash scholars would need to know precisely if this pipeline is completely important for society and whether unreasonable power ought to be utilized against the protestors. Unreasonable power has been utilized on the Native Americans. Government experts are approved to utilize police mutts, pepper shower, and poisonous gas. These individuals are just ensuring their property and they have each privilege to voice their worries. They have the privilege to challenge. Emblematic interactionists would be keen on concentrate the images that are being utilized by the Native Americans in the Dakota Pipeline Protest. Scientists may most likely need to initially confirm in the event that it is simply Native Americans that are associated with the challenge. They should talk with people and question their race. They should endeavor to inspect how the venture is influencing people's general public and to decide whether it is just Native American who are voicing their assessments. Specialists would talk with people to discover how important the land is to them. It is essential for the analyst to comprehend what the land symbolizes on the grounds that that is the establishment of the challenge. They may likewise look at if the imagery of the land varies to every individual included. Representative interactionists may likewise ponder the dress of the Native Americans, and also the melodies they sing generally on the building site. In light of the media, some Native Americans wore conventional attire to speak to their precursors and to demonstrate that they will keep on battling for them. The conventional tunes are sung close to the building site to advance solidarity. The weapons that the Native Americans use to counter the extreme power from the Government may likewise draw in analysts. Rather than utilizing firearms or cutting edge weapons, the Native Americans are seen utilizing sling shots, ponies, or even their banners as weapons. The scientists should need to talk with people vis-à-vis and question them on their decision of weapon. In light of recordings from media, it demonstrates that these Native Americans are bringing pride into their way of life. Work Cited: Henslin, J. M. (2012). Human science: A Down-to-Ear>GET ANSWER