Choose a criminal offender who committed crimes due to a biological reason.
Write a 1,400- to 2,100-word paper discussing the genetic or physiological evidence that supports the notion that biology played a key role in explaining the offender’s criminality.
Research the behaviors that constitute psychopathy. Discuss in detail the specific behaviors demonstrated by the offender that align with behaviors indicative of a psychopathic individual. Case examples include the following:
Andrea Yates and the documented evidence of psychiatric issues, including post-partum depression, prior to the murders of her five children
Charles Whitman, known as the Texas Tower Sniper, and the presence of a tumor discovered post-mortem alleged to have played a role in his overt acts of aggression
John Hinckley, Jr. and the documented evidence of psychiatric issues leading to his controversial insanity defense in the shooting of President Ronald Reagan
Individuals have an innate drive and energy for discovering exculpation in what they consider the 'great life.' For a considerable length of time in any case, scholars have attempted to contend a strong case for such. It can be recommended that numerous features work as one to permit a decent life, however would could it be that could give a bound together response to this extraordinary philosophical inquiry? This exposition will endeavor to clear up such vulnerability, considering two points of view of the 'great life'. Right off the bat, are there any attributes, needs, capacities and arranged different components that are shared by all people? Besides, if there are components which exist, at that point what do these require the great life to incorporate, or what should the great life resemble, given the properties we as a whole offer? To accomplish the responses to these inquiries, reference will be given to Natural Law, Virtue Theory, Eudaemonia and joy. We are for the most part endeavoring towards it, the great life, satisfaction, prosperity, a very much lived life, satisfaction. In any case, would could it be that influences us to rest easy? In spite of the fact that hard to give a fathomable definition, goodness is by and large alluded to as particular qualities or properties of a genuine question or set of items. All the more along these lines, the idea of goodness can be isolated into other, backup ideas (Goodness and Value Theory, 2004). That is, a progression of occasions which prompt inborn goodness. Fundamentally, both are esteemed roundabout and leave no important definition for dialog. The great life is a condition in which a man will be the most upbeat. Such joy can be examined through a deductive viewpoint, which has been finished by numerous logicians after some time (Wernqvist, 2007). Two such scholars, Plato and Aristotle, esteem the great life as the state in which a man displays add up to ethicalness. All through this article, their works will be looked into to give clear contention to the significance a decent life for people. People, their qualities and their exercises can be assessed in connection to the parts they play in human life (Meyers-Levy, 2009). On the other hand saying, that each feature of human life can add to what is considered great. People, being a subject of creation, eventually involve goodness. Such a life is one in which activities somebody does and feels prompts what is also called joy. Such bliss is neither only an ordeal; nor is it found because of following good laws. Or maybe, satisfaction is a movement. It is the occasions of the person which prompt the life of good. Embed REFERENCE Over time, scholars, for example, Plato and Aristotle have endeavored to feature the idea of goodness by safeguarding different records. Such records don't require that a man who is fortunate only experience any sentiments of joy or fulfillment. What they do require is that their wants are deliberately satisfied, which does not come down to a similar thing (Angner, 2009). Plato contends that a man will display add up to righteousness when their wants have been extinguished (Cooper and Hutchison, 1997), while Aristotle trusts the ideal condition of the individual will bring their definitive uprightness (Solomon, 1984). Cooper and Hutchinson (1997) compose that Plato's contention for the great life is originated from affection on the grounds that through this, people can free themselves of wants. That is, love is really the mission for that great. Aristotle contends that the great life is diverse for every individual since it originates from carrying on with one's life as per one's ethics, and every individual has distinctive excellencies (Solomon, 1984). Through examination of their works, both Plato and Aristotle concur the great life is a show of flawless ideals. Be that as it may, they differ on the specific meaning of prudence and its relationship to joy. In this manner, both differ on the methods for accomplishing such satisfaction. Plato sees the great life as being accomplished through the ideal love and absence of want (Cooper and Hutchinson, 1997), while Aristotle trusts that the great life is accomplished through an immaculate state which makes its natives follow up on their temperances (Solomon, 1984). The first Platonic perspective of the world, (refered to Cooper and Hutchinson, 1997) is that it is a two layered place, the upper level being the universe of flawlessness, the lower level being the universe of the real world, and love falling some place in the middle. The hypothesis is that the plane of the truth is a blemished duplicate of the plane of flawlessness. As per the Platonic view, people just observe looks of the great while existing in the plane of the real world. Plato trusts that affection is the midpoint amongst the real world and flawlessness, mortality and eternality. Love does not fall into the circle of immortals and flawlessness since how could love be a divine being whether he isn't in control of excellent and great things? Since Love is the adoration for excellent things, Love must have wants and in this way can't be a divine being Yet Love is more prominent than mortals since affection has and dependably will exist. Subsequently Love is an awesome soul, a midpoint between the domains of presence (Cooper and Hutchinson, 1997). To Plato, the great life is one in which a man is shows culminate goodness and is in this way closer to the higher domain of presence. Temperance is originates from the nonappearance of wants, so obvious satisfaction implies being fulfilled to the point one doesn't have wants. This fulfillment and joy happen when a man touches base at the otherworldly comprehension of the world (Cooper and Hutchinson, 1997). As indicated by Plato, through Diotima and Socrates' discourse, love is the medium in which people will achieve the learning of the great, and happen upon this comprehension. It is human instinct to search out joy, and responsibility for things makes one upbeat. (Cooper and Hutchinson, 1997). Solomon (1984) outlines that with a specific end goal to demonstrate that bliss lies in temperance, Aristotle first parts types of the great into three sections, outer products, merchandise of the body, and merchandise of the spirit. He goes ahead to state that merchandise of the spirit (ideals) are the most essential in light of the fact that with them, a man can increase material riches and delight. Aristotle characterizes bliss and subsequently the great life as the acknowledgment and ideal exercise of perfection. This is along these lines alluded to as Eudaemonia. Aristotle's perspective of such is regularly viewed as a target record of prosperity. Regardless, subjective positions do obviously assume some part in prosperity notwithstanding as indicated by Aristotle (Phillips, 2005). This is the place the presence of goodness turns into a subjective record, since it depicts a man's prosperity as a component of his or her sentiments, encounters, wants, et cetera, consequently making it a cognizant property of human life.>GET ANSWER