You’ve just been hired onto ABC Company as the corporate controller. ABC Company is a manufacturing firm that specializes in making cedar roofing and siding shingles. The company currently has annual sales of around $1.2 million, a 25% increase from the previous year. The company has an aggressive growth target of reaching $3 million annual sales within the next 3 years. The CEO has been trying to find additional products that can leverage the current ABC employee skillset as well as the manufacturing facilities.
As the controller of ABC Company, the CEO has come to you with a new opportunity that he’s been working on. The CEO would like to use the some of the shingle scrap materials to build cedar dollhouses. While this new product line would add additional raw materials and be more time-intensive to manufacture than the cedar shingles, this new product line will be able to leverage ABC’s existing manufacturing facilities as well as the current staff. Although this product line will require added expenses, it will provide additional revenue and gross profit to help reach the growth targets. The CEO is relying on you to help decide how this project can be afforded. Provide details about the estimated product costs, what is needed to break even on the project, and what level of return this product is expected to provide.
'At the point when ladies carry out violations, they do as such in a way proper to their sex.' (Carol Smart) Talk about the exactness of this announcement with reference to the Eighteenth Century time frame. 'Criminologists concur that the sex hole in wrongdoing is widespread: Women are dependably and wherever more improbable than men to carry out criminal acts.' All through the ages and with not very many exemptions, wrongdoing, and particularly the all the more unspeakably horrible and savage acts, have dependably been believed to be, in the most part, the space of the male. Assaults, murders and merciless strike were viewed as 'manly' offenses, and much proof is accessible to demonstrate that the more genuine wrongdoings were for the most part attempted by guys, 'The greater part of British convicts set apart for transportation were local Englishmen condemned in English courts,' and ladies just extremely bested wrongdoing figures when it came to prostitution. Ladies as a sexual orientation were generally considered not to be equipped for the savagery or profound situated malice of men. All things considered, in eighteenth century man centric culture, they were generally observed as shy, compliant animals. Genuine, some had fallen on the wrong side of the tracks and had turned out to be frivolous cheats or prostitutes, yet a typical contemporary origination appeared to exist that ladies were practically unequipped for malevolence. To be sure, there is a solid contention to recommend such perspectives depended on traditional belief systems. People were seen to have entirely unexpected physical make-ups and have essentially extraordinary constructive and antagonistic characteristics, and when all is said in done have a more straightforward and physical point of view. 'Men were inclined to brutality, determination, and childishness, while ladies' transgressions were seen as the aftereffect of their inclination to be administered by their bodies and their feelings, outstandingly desire.' This was additionally seen when it came to ladies inside wrongdoing. Female abnormality was viewed as principally one of sexual perversion and all things considered, a scourge on the ethical structure holding the system together instead of direct malignance against one person. They were sent to be associated with disgraceful, filthy interests as opposed to coordinate fierce wrongdoings, thus the measurements appeared to demonstrate. Ladies represented just 27% of the litigants attempted in the vicinity of 1674 and 1834. Without a doubt, they were for the most part observed by society as by a long shot the less debilitating of the genders. In any case, it isn't generally astounding this is the situation, and in my view, thought about the genuine position of ladies in eighteenth century society and additionally the observations that ran with them. All things considered, ladies were significantly less prone to be associated with difficult work, thus for the most part were not included with the testosterone fuelled environment of working environments and alehouses, and had no simple access to limit 'weapons, for example, tomahawks, spades and picks which could be raised to a deadly reason effectively if an unconstrained battle or contention was to break out among the workers. Combined with this, the female circle of society, as the area of society measurably engaged with less genuine violations, were just once in a while dragged through the court as right now as just a little part of wrongdoings were really arraigned. Truth be told, court procedures in the eighteenth century were to some degree one-sided towards females, in that 'juries may have been more hesitant to convict ladies since female wrongdoing was seen as less debilitating than that conferred by men.' Indeed, occasions of courts making a huge effort to attempt to and conceal the way that ladies could likewise be ethically despicable, appear to be in prove. For instance, amid the preliminary of Mary Price in 1718, in spite of the fact that the lady being referred to conceded to choking a young lady with a calfskin lash, a shocked court exhorted her that it 'would allow her to pull back her Plea' however regardless she persevered to confess. The Court at that point advised her 'she would do well to consider what she did, for maybe on the off chance that she argued Not Guilty, [the crime] won't not be prov'd upon her.' As it turned out, she stayed with her underlying answer, kept her request liable and in the long run got sentence of death, yet this case appears to demonstrate a reasonable demeanor of a court who discovered it to a great degree hard to see the feasibility of rough ladies. Notwithstanding her request of blame, honestly horrendous wrongdoing of choking a young lady and readiness to pay its cost, it nearly appears that she was endeavored to be talked cycle a hanging. Undoubtedly, and in addition this, there was even a legitimate guideline called 'feme clandestine', which, albeit truly not called upon especially frequently, was in some cases used to excuse wedded ladies who carried out violations within the sight of their husbands, the justification being that the women were ventured to take after their 'prevalent' life partners orders Notwithstanding, whatever the measurements may state, the idea that ladies were blameworthy just of negligible robbery and prostitution endures with some especially ruthless abnormalities, as well as various cases of child murder and aggregate disregard of youthful kids that goes some way or another to demonstrate the eighteenth century perspective of 'non vindictive ladies' as very obsolete. 'Child murder was viewed as the most well-known type of murder right off the bat in the seventeenth century and even upto the mid nineteenth century, authors kept on trusting that it was a typical event' and there appears to be little uncertainty of its pervasiveness in the Eighteenth Century. For instance, the accompanying instance of unimaginable cold-bloodedness occurred, and regardless of the way that the record appears to propose blame, the litigant was absolved. 'Mary Tudor, of the Parish of Saint Andrews Holborn, was prosecuted for the Murther of her Female Infant Bastard, on the eighteenth of January last, by tossing the same into a Place of Office, whereby it was choaked and choked. She called a Witness to demonstrate that she was Married, and that the Child was no Bastard.' In reality, child murder coroners tended just to achieve a blameworthy decision just in the most clear instances of child murder and overlaying (the covering of kids), harming and general deadly disregard once in a while prompted a conviction, being difficult to demonstrate. For instance, another for example, that of Elizabeth Cole, showed a to a great degree coldhearted demolition of a youngster at the same time, because of uncontrollable issues at hand (counting the way that she moved about the room!) prompted her being articulated 'not liable'. Arraigned for the Murder of her Female Infant matured 3 Years, by tossing of her into the River of Thames, on the ninth of January last. It was prov'd evidently that the Prisoner had such a Child yet in her Defense it appear'd plain that she had for a significant time been under an incredible inconvenience of Mind, and especially when she lay In three Months back, would ascend out of her Bed and Dance about the Room Obviously, it must be viewed as that these ladies may have been under gigantic social, money related or peer aggregate strain to by one means or another discard these youngsters, yet in spite of the eighteenth Century Not Guilty decision, it is hard, in spite of the tremendously extraordinary social settings of contemporary ethics and those of the 1700's, to discover these demonstrations something besides unpleasant confirmations of unfeeling human murder. To be sure, in spite of the fact that these are simply two illustrations, it appears that numerous other such acts took put, and extremely should urge the Historian to scrutinize ladies were as blameless of fierce wrongdoings as prevalent thinking and insights of the time proposed them to be. Several surviving records of child murder are demonstration of a portion of the over the top brutality that occurred the hands of eighteenth century ladies who butchered their own particular fragile living creature and blood. Be that as it may, child murder was by all account not the only type of mercilessness that occurred, and in addition the fairly stunning cases of killing ones claim youngsters that sustained the lawful list of the eighteenth century, other direct dangerous violations were additionally connected to certain notorious ladies of wrongdoing in this period, turned out to be especially as horrendous and ruthless as their men society. One such illustration was the situation of Catherine Hayes who, in 1726, was accounted for to have coordinated the abhorrent murder of her better half through two associates. Billins broke his scull as he lay on the bed with a hatchet, and knock'd out his brains, which causing an extraordinary emission of blood, the great lady advis'd to cut the take off, which was done as needs be; she a short time later presented to them a crate to put the body in. She was later hung and consumed and caused to some degree a hullabaloo, one daily paper curiously portraying the occurrence as an 'unfathomable murder of her significant other,' suggestingthat the nearness of a lady in such an episode truly was a particular stun to English society of the time. Without a doubt, nobody can debate that homicides by ladies were unmistakably not exactly those of guys, as this stun would propose, yet records of vindictive women appear to be anything but difficult to discover. Without a doubt, Catherine Hayes' misfortune was unquestionably not a secluded episode. Another case discusses a Mistress extremely whipping, copying (with a super hot poker) and beating her maidservant with a sledge for supposedly taking a shilling, while another woman was copied at the stake for wounding her significant other in the crotch with an especially vast cutting blade. Still more regrettable was the situation of the two Sarah Metyard's (mom and little girl) who beat, bolted away and in the end starved to death a multi year old young lady, apparently through just cruel thinking, as the accompanying confirmation from another young lady in the moms benefit appears to affirm.>GET ANSWER