Sam Smith is a business owner who frequently travels internationally. He is a large man with wavy black hair and a heavy beard, and while he is of European descent, he is frequently mistaken as Middle Eastern. When Sam was checking in at the Los Angeles airport for a business flight to Spain, an employee of the Federal Air Transportation Security Department decided that, because Sam had no carry-on baggage and was dressed in a business suit, he appeared suspicious. The agent detained Sam for more than 2 hours in a locked room, causing Sam to miss his flight. During the period Sam was detained, he was not permitted use of a telephone and was handcuffed.
Sam has retained the attorney for whom you work to bring an action for damages due to these events. Consider the following:
What kind of action should Sam bring? Who should the defendant(s) be? What remedies are available? Do you think Sam will prevail in an action against the agency? Why, or why not? Be sure to justify your answer.
Please only use the book for a source – https://purdueuniversityglobal.vitalsource.com/#/user/signin
"The World is Flat," by Thomas Friedman, accounts the convergence of countless players on the worldwide monetary stage that has made a solid power that is as of now influencing Americans. Friedman trusts that these approaching changes can possibly create both positive and negative outcomes. A precedent that delineates the scope of Friedman's investigation is his contention about the effect of the website air pocket and its inevitable bust. He proposes that in spite of the fact that the bust was awful for a few financial specialists, it ended up being great in opening up worldwide markets. The overcapacity which delivered the bust likewise created low costs for broadcast communications, along these lines empowering players from littler financial locales to take an interest in a diversion typically saved for greater players. Friedman portrays a few instances of various firms in these locales that have risen to give innovation administrations to American business. One model, including an Indian firm that does fundamental expense form work for an American bookkeeping organization, mirrors his view that in spite of the fact that cost points of interest are essential, the genuine centrality are the focused extents and advancements made conceivable by this new innovation. A standout amongst the most vital acumens of his book is that Americans ought to become acclimated to the way that the United States won't long remain the most grounded player on the field. From my perspective, the United States have severely required a decent portion of modesty, and these worldwide movements Friedman distinguishes guarantee to move us that way. While numerous sections point toward the approach of an arrangement of worldwide participation where nobody player claims strength, numerous others accept a win-lose situation, in which Americans will be ruled by the Indians and Chinese on the off chance that they don't start acting responsibly. Friedman begins one of his sections with a short relating of the end result for America's past world strength in b-ball, portraying it as an extraordinary representation for what is occurring in the worldwide economy. Rather than getting a handle on the new levelness of the worldwide monetary framework, he wants for the brilliance days when the United States was still big boss. He composes over and over again as though the main decision Americans have is to play and win, or to be failures. This penchant is especially undeniable in his incessant references to the assurance of high-stakes rivalry. "There is no opportunity to rest; we need to work harder; the Europeans are reprobate since they esteem having more occasions." Friedman composes just as this isn't a choice, yet there are decisions, or there should be. In the event that the present framework lessens a large number of those decisions, maybe we should change the framework. Globalization is about productivity. However, as Friedman concedes, there's something else entirely to it than that. He considers the anxieties and drawbacks in globalization in the section titled "The Great Sorting Out," yet despite everything he appears to be hesitant to truly investigate the outcomes. Friedman appears to be reluctant to recognize that the framework is altogether influenced by worldwide political structures or the nonattendance thereof. For instance, he makes reference to the requirement for the United States to build up a vitality freedom arrangement, particularly to adapt to the normal gigantic increments in the interest for vitality by China and India. Be that as it may, the majority of this dialog happens in a section on the most proficient method to kick off American science and innovation instruction so we can remain aggressive. Friedman completes a truly great job of recognizing globalization's effect on laborers. He perceives that the world isn't yet extremely level yet in light of the fact that there are as yet a large number of individuals who are not ready to contend in the worldwide market. Be that as it may, he is as yet hesitant to point at auxiliary issues. Friedman offers an assessment of how the non-popularity based political structures of the Middle East do exclude a great part of the populace who live there from the advantages of development and enhancement. I should imagine that we require more than expectation; The United States needs to create open strategies that have worldwide achieve, that verify that in any event the key players are at the worldwide eating table can agreeably address a portion of the outstanding issues. In the event that the cost of these strategies creates lost proficiency, we ought to have a legit banter about this exchange off, instead of accepting that productivity dependably wins.>GET ANSWER