How does this apply to today?, What makes this an urban issue?, How does this impact women?, Is this true for other races as well?, and What are possible solutions?
These precedents all lead to the following inquiry; if individuals' viewpoints and tastes shift so vigorously, how would we know which one is correct, or genuine? Is their a wrong side of the scaffold? Is there an approach to decide this? No. Because of the constraints of reason and intelligent reasoning, until further notice the sum total of what we have is our obstinate suppositions. These conclusions have been referred to get us in a bad position as a race. Since the principal religious wars, individuals have been battling about convictions, region, and who the more grounded is. Life would nearly be a lot simpler if a correct answer was definite. Apply from: From Socrates to Sartre: The Philosophic Quest: p. 207 Hegel's Metaphysics: Absolute Idealism "Reality as totality of calculated truth" – Idea that complete the truth is a flat out psyche, or the brain of god, which is an incorporated and organized wellspring of facts. "Reality as total personality" – the truth is supreme thought which uncovers itself through human encounters in all parts of life. "The genuine is the reasonable and the judicious is the genuine" "The truth is comprehensible by its clear, levelheaded structures" – Hegel is very against the rule that the truth is mysterious, for he trusts it is available for each human to achieve through reason. Hegel, much like Plato, is a relativist, and a solid one at that. "Hegel is as certain a pragmatist as Plato had been." (From Socrates to Sartre, p. 209) He is a firm adherent that reality, and what is genuine, is definable through discerning idea, something that is available in all people. He feels that "what is genuine?" all relies upon the individual, and their own encounters.>GET ANSWER