Write a 1500 word Case Study Analysis by answering the following questions:
1. What was the transformation that took place at Valpak?
2. What types of Agile methodologies were used at Valpak?
3. What is an “Architectural epic”?
4. What is portfolio Kanban and how was it implemented at Valpak?
5. How did projects get implemented at Valpak since SAFe doesn’t recognize projects?
6. What were the big challenges that were addressed at Valpak?
7. What were the key success factors at Valpak?
8. What were the results and conclusions from the Valpak implementation of SAFe?
9. What were the lessons learned from Valpak regarding the implementation?
Write a 500 word summary on the following questions that you would anticipate if the same kind of implementation was addressed at your company
10. How would this approach be implemented at your company?
11. What methodologies would be changing at your company to go to the SAFe type of methodology?
12. Give an example of an “Architectural epic” that would be used at your company.
13. How would portfolio Kanban be implemented at your company?
14. What do you think the biggest challenges you would face at your company if you were the consultant hired to implement the same types of processes that were addressed at Valpak?
15. If it were to be successful at your company, what would the key success factors be?
Bowlby's Attachment Theory: Applications in Social Work Distributed: third August, 2018 Last Edited: third August, 2018 Disclaimer: This exposition has been presented by an understudy. This isn't a case of the work composed by our expert paper scholars. You can see tests of our expert work here. Any sentiments, discoveries, conclusions or suggestions communicated in this material are those of the writers and don't really mirror the perspectives of UK Essays. Portray and Evaluate Attachment Theory and Assess Its Value for Social Work. Connection hypothesis, spearheaded by John Bowlby, holds that a person's passionate and relational advancement all through life can be comprehended, and is at last molded by and established in, an arrangement of connection practices they shape and disguise amid a basic period in early life. As indicated by Bowlby, connection conduct in youngsters emerges out of an inborn, instinctual requirement for security and solidness. (Bowlby, 1969) Though a kid can shape numerous connections, there is generally one essential figure they put at the highest point of their chain of command. This is generally the tyke's mom. Be that as it may, there is nothing characteristic about the 'maternal' relationship as such that sets up its power over other connection connections. It is essentially that moms are regularly the most touchy and responsive parental figures on a predictable premise over the longest timeframe. There are vital quantitative and subjective refinements Bowlby attracts to legitimately portray the connection relationship. The subjective refinement needs to do with the idea of providing care. Youngsters shape connections in view of the affectability and responsiveness of a grown-up's response to connection practices. Consequently, a grown-up who encourages a kid however who is in the meantime inhumane or lethargic will be a more improbable possibility for connection than a grown-up who does not sustain them but rather stays delicate and responsive in their cooperations with the kid. Indeed, even with the subjective conditions met, the connection relationship is as yet in light of their steady application over an expanded timeframe. It isn't sufficient to be responsive and delicate as a guardian in some case. Sound connection connections are shaped with these subjective conditions legitimately met after some time. The essential connection figure is normally the most reliable and ceaselessly give individual who communicates the youngster. Besides, this quantitative qualification has all the earmarks of being the more huge of the two in framing connection connections in light of the fact that the absence of proper parental figure responsiveness has been demonstrated not to disjoin or nullify the connection relationship, but rather to bring about undesirable and even neurotic connection practices. (Ainsworth, 1985) So the requirement for security and soundness with respect to the newborn child brings about connection practices coordinated most regularly at a parent, more often than not the mother, who turns into their essential connection figure. The idea of these practices is dictated by how the essential connection figure reacts to them. In this manner, the connection relationship mirrors the collaboration between newborn child require and parental reaction. A standout amongst the most promptly identifiable connection practices is closeness chasing, where the youngster reacts to distressful or unnerving boost by searching out their essential connection figure. It is this security that the baby's instinctual conduct is intended to accomplish. The part of this security is basic for the arrangement of a mental soundness that enables appropriate advancement to happen. Partition (or the danger of division) from the parental figure, or improper guardian reactions to connection conduct, can bring about caution and uneasiness which capture the advancement of the tyke as they look to restore the security that enables them to normally create. Bowlby recognizes the day and age of a half year to two years old as a basic stage where the greater part of the essential connections, and after which, the principal disguises of an 'interior working model' are shaped. Amid this time newborn children and babies start to show connection practices that produce associations with guardians which will frame the reason for how they interface and identify with whatever remains of the world. Bowlby portrays the 'inward working model', which creates after the 'affectability period', as a premise of comprehension against which the youngster relates and reacts to everything from the experience and investigation of feelings to the development and comprehension of human connections and collaborations. The 'interior working model' isn't unavoidably settled amid the basic time frame, however it is most intensely and at first impacted there. Consequently the formative significance, and effect, of this period on the kid is of gigantic hugeness to their solid development and future prosperity. Though Bowlby's model perspectives connections as the building squares of an 'interior working model' that keeps on creating all through the kid's life, it doesn't dig profoundly into the part of security made by connection practices, and the different sorts of conduct that can take after from different parental reactions. Here, Mary Ainsworth's expansion to connection hypothesis is comparatively spearheading. Ainsworth recognizes the part of the essential connection figure as a 'protected base' from which the kid is allowed to investigate. (Ainsworth et al., 1978) This investigation is a characteristic piece of the youngster's advancement and will happen remarkably as indicated by the given elements introduce in the identity and cosmetics of every kid. Such investigation happens, in any case, under the states of solid connection. To distinguish diverse kinds of connections, Ainsworth led an observational investigation known as the 'abnormal circumstance' which yielded three starting groupings of connection conduct: secure, safe, avoidant. Later investigations following up on this work included a fourth: complicated, for the most part coming about because of harsh circumstances or rationally unsound parental reaction. Together, these four classes frame the generally acknowledged characterizations of connection conduct inside the youngster/guardian relationship in connection hypothesis. In the peculiar circumstance examine, a mother went into a stay with her kid. After they were allowed to sit unbothered and the kid started playing with toys an outsider went into the room and started conversing with the mother, at that point moved toward the youngster with a toy. The mother left as the outsider drew in the tyke, at that point returned. The kid was then taken off alone after which the more interesting, at that point the mother progressively returned. At long last, the more interesting left and the mother and tyke were separated from everyone else together in the room once more. The examination took a gander at how the kids reacted to the nearness and nonattendance of their mom and an outsider, in various varieties, and how they investigated the room and connected with the toys. Safely joined babies investigated the room while staying mindful of their connection figure's area. They were frightened by their mom's takeoff from the room and console by her arrival. They were likewise more agreeable and willing to draw in the outsider within the sight of their mom, and more alright with the more interesting's connection with their mom truant than those not safely joined. Avoidant shakily connected kids indicated little reaction upon their mom's takeoff or return while safe unreliably appended youngsters showed extraordinary pain upon their mom's flight and opposition upon get-together, as though the requirement for the guardian had been perceived however not joined by a sentiment of security in tolerating their soothing signals, potentially because of conflicting parental affectability and responsiveness to the tyke's needs. Here unmistakably the consistency of parental accessibility and the way of parental reaction are enter in deciding the basic structure of how youngsters respond to their condition and interface with others. We see with Bowlby and Ainsworth the improvement of a model concentrated on the soonest phases of relational and enthusiastic advancement which not just recognizes the correlative effect upon the prosperity of youngsters in later life, however gives a structure to understanding the causal components engaged with various sorts of distinguished practices. This is an especially helpful apparatus in the field of social work where bunch factors regularly confuse the perspective of how best to affect a youngster's welfare. (Howe et al., 1999) Understanding the formative perspectives that advise sound conduct and development is a critical device in going up against huge numbers of the difficulties confronting social laborers today. This is clear in the primary case of Howe et al's. Attachment Theory, Child Maltreatment, and Family Support: A Practice and Assessment Model. His first case is of a lady, Melanie, who was raised by a requesting, oppressive, and rationally unsound mother, who was sexually manhandled by her dad frequently (He kicked the bucket of a heart-assault the night after he had sex with her at fourteen years old), and who has three kids. Her most established child, Peter, age 7, has displayed fierce conduct toward other kids, exhibited activities of robbery, fire related crime, mercilessness toward creatures, and has no companions. Her second child, age 3, is peaceful and she is uncertain about her capacity to bring up her newborn child little girl. Howe portrays how "a formative point of view in light of individuals' over a significant time span socio-enthusiastic encounters, especially inside cozy connections, offers a great knowledge into human identity, styles of providing care and the character of relational life." (Howe et al., 1999, p.3) It is this understanding empowers a comprehension of main drivers in the midst of the mist of formative many-sided quality that plays into the difficulties confronting social specialists. With connection hypothesis as an apparatus, filtering through the haze of variables that shape a person�>GET ANSWER