Imagine that you are preparing taxes for a local tax service provider. A married couple named Judy and Walter Townson have come to you to seeking assistance with their federal income taxes. During your meeting with the Townsons, you gather the following information:
They are both 55 years of age.
They have two daughters and one son. One daughter (age 25) is married with children. One daughter (age 20) is living at home and attending college. Their son (age 16) is a junior in high school.
They are currently paying for their college-student daughter to attend school full time.
Judy is employed as a teacher and makes $60,000 a year. She used $500 of her personal funds to purchase books and other supplies for her classroom.
Walter is employed as a CPA and makes $100,000 a year.
They provided you a 1099-INT which reported $4,500 in interest of which $500 was savings bond interest.
They provided you a 1099-DIV which reported $300 in dividends.
They received a state tax refund last year of $385.
They provided you a list of expenses including:
Doctor’s bills, $800
New glasses, $2000
Dental bills, $560
Property taxes for their two cars of $800, which included $50 in decal fees
Real estate taxes of $4500
Mortgage interest of $12,000
Gifts to charities, $1000
GoFundMe contribution to local family in need, $100
Tax Preparation Fees for last year’s taxes, $400
Consider the most beneficial way for Judy and Walter to file their federal income tax return. Prepare a brief written summary that addresses the following:
Estimated taxable income for Judy and Walter (please show computations!)
Summary of tax return, including any suggestions or tax planning considerations
Explain how you determined the filing status, dependents, and use of standard/itemized deduction.
Note: The summary should be no more than 500 words and should be uploaded as a Word document with a cover page via the Blackboard assignment tab in Week 5.
The specific course learning outcomes associated with this assignment are:
Review tax authorities and sources of tax law.
Assess the concepts of gross income and strategies to minimize gross income.
Examine deductions from income, limitations on those deductions, and strategies for maximizing deductions.
natives was authentic to the degree that it was 'protecting the fair establishments' of the State. As there were no satisfactory assurances against maltreatment, Article 8 was not abused. It tends to be seen from these cases that their relationship to Article 8 of the Convention is notably comparative, yet, they have been chosen in an unexpected way. The cases symbolize the significance of the expression identifying with the need of a law based society yet show how, as per its very own attentiveness, the court can control the case one of two different ways: either by expressing the significance of a popularity based society in shielding the State and along these lines approving the reconnaissance of residents, or; offering assurance to similar natives since this is what is required in a law based society. It appears that the cases were settled on as indicated by the probability of relative danger, as the Convention states, 'in light of a legitimate concern for national security, open wellbeing or the financial prosperity of the nation, for the avoidance of confusion or wrongdoing, for the insurance of wellbeing or ethics, or for the assurance of the rights and opportunities of others.' Get help with your exposition today, from our expert paper scholars! Qualified essayists in the subject of law are prepared and holding on to assist you with your investigations. Get help with your article View expertly composed examples Article 10 of the Convention accommodates the privilege to opportunity of articulation. These opportunities are liable to 'customs, conditions, limitations and punishments, as are endorsed by law and important in a vote based society.' At this point, it is maybe beneficial to take note of that the ECHR applies what is known as the edge of gratefulness, with the goal that Member States have a proportion of national carefulness in the manner they offer impact to general benchmarks set out in the Convention. A precedent is the ECHR's ruling for the United Kingdom's choice to boycott the movie, Visions of Ecstasy, under its sacrilege law, regardless of the Director's case that it disregarded his entitlement to the right to speak freely. The Court managed by seven votes to two that the refusal of the Director's case was legitimized under Article 10(2) as being important in a just society. The Board of Film Classification trusted that the film would encroach the criminal law of lewdness. It was expressed anyway that despite the fact that the law of disrespect did not treat all religions similarly, it didn't cheapen the authenticity of the Director's point, and it was predictable with the points of Article 9 of the Convention. The Court decided that while the law of sacrilege was summoned infrequently, there was not adequate agreement with Member States to>GET ANSWER