In a complex, multicultural business environment, it is important that business professionals adhere to ethical standards throughout their daily activities. The goal of this course is to introduce you to concepts and guidelines for ethical courses of actions in business. In order to assess your understanding of the material and your ability to apply the required concepts, you will be asked to take on the role of the ethics director for the company in the scenario. You will be asked to design an ethics curriculum for new employees to address the rights and responsibilities of employees and the ethical relationship between employer and employee. You will also be tasked with developing an ethical dilemma for analysis, offering ethical decisions for evaluation, and examining the role of personal values and goals in the workplace.
You are the ethics officer of a marketing firm. The company prides itself on only engaging in ethical business practices. In order to ensure that all of its employees understand corporate ethical policy, new employees must attend an ethics training as part of the onboarding process. Additionally, every employee must attend an annual ethics training. These ethical training programs are developed by the marketing firm’s ethics officer (you), the marketing firm’s human resources (HR) director, and an outside consulting firm.
In a joint development session, the team works through the training development materials that will be presented at this year’s two-day ethics training session. This year, the focus is on two primary topics: employees’ rights and responsibilities in the workplace and employer’s ethical responsibilities toward employees. In addition, hypothetical ethical scenarios are developed to evaluate the employees’ understanding of company ethical standards, general ethical decision-making, and desired courses of action.
Your submission must be your original work. No more than a combined total of 30% of the submission and no more than a 10% match to any one individual source can be directly quoted or closely paraphrased from sources, even if cited correctly. An originality report is provided when you submit your task that can be used as a guide.
You must use the rubric to direct the creation of your submission because it provides detailed criteria that will be used to evaluate your work. Each requirement below may be evaluated by more than one rubric aspect. The rubric aspect titles may contain hyperlinks to relevant portions of the course.
A. Take on the role of the ethics officer in the scenario and address the following:
- Describe three rights and responsibilities of employees based on the scenario.
- Evaluate two ethical responsibilities of the employer within the context of the employer/employee relationship described in the scenario.
- Develop one ethical business dilemma that can be used to demonstrate employee understanding of the company’s ethical standards.
- Evaluate the dilemma from part A3 from a utilitarian and relativistic perspective.
- Describe two common ethical decisions that reflect corporate ethics and responsibilities that employees can face while working in a corporate setting.
Note: These should be different from the ethical business dilemma in part A3.
- Explain why each ethical decision in part A5 presents an ethical dilemma and how an individual might justify unethical behavior (e.g., common excuses).
B. Acknowledge sources, using in-text citations and references, for content that is quoted, paraphrased, or summarized.
C. Demonstrate professional communication in the content and presentation of your submission.
The United States is home to the absolute generally infamous and productive sequential executioners ever. Names, for example, Ted Bundy, Gary Ridgeway, and the Zodiac Killer have become easily recognized names because of the terrible idea of their wrongdoings. One of the most productive sequential executioners in American history is John Wayne Gacy. Nicknamed the Killer Clown on account of his calling, Gacy assaulted and killed at any rate 33 adolescent young men and youngsters somewhere in the range of 1972 and 1978, which is one of the most elevated realized unfortunate casualty checks. Gacy's story has become so outstanding that his wrongdoings have been highlighted in mainstream society and TV appears, for example, American Horror Story: Hotel and Criminal Minds. Scientific science has, and keeps on playing, a significant job in the explaining of the case and ID of the people in question. John Wayne Gacy's history of sexual and psychological mistreatment was instrumental in arousing specialist's curiosity of him as a suspect. John Wayne Gacy was conceived on March 17, 1942, in Chicago, Illinois. Being the main child out of three youngsters, Gacy had a stressed association with his dad, who drank vigorously and was frequently damaging towards the whole family (Sullivan and Maiken 48). In 1949, a temporary worker, who was a family companion, would stroke Gacy during rides in his truck; be that as it may, Gacy never uncovered these experiences to his folks inspired by a paranoid fear of revenge from his dad (Foreman 54). His dad's mental maltreatment proceeded into his young grown-up years, and Gacy moved to Las Vegas where he worked quickly in the emergency vehicle administration before turning into a funeral home specialist (Sullivan and Maiken 50). As a funeral home chaperon, Gacy was intensely associated with the treating procedure and conceded that one night, he moved into the pine box of a perished adolescent kid and touched the body (Cahill and Ewing 46). Stunned at himself, Gacy comes back to Chicago to live with his family and graduates from Northwestern Business College in 1963, and acknowledges an administration student position with Nunn-Bush Shoe Company. In 1964, Gacy is moved to Springfield and meets his future spouse, Marlynn Myers. In Springfield, Gacy has his subsequent gay experience when a collaborator shakily performed oral sex on him (London 11:7). Gacy moves to Waterloo, Iowa, and starts a family with Myers. Be that as it may, after normally undermining his significant other with whores, Gacy submits his previously known rape in 1967 upon Donald Vorhees. In the coming months, Gacy explicitly mishandles a few different young people and is captured and accused of oral homosexuality (Sullivan and Maiken 60). On December 3, 1968, Gacy is indicted and condemned to ten years at the Anamosa State Penitentiary. Gacy turns into a model detainee at Anamosa and is conceded parole in June of 1970, a minor year and a half after his condemning. He had to move to Chicago and live with his mom and watch a 10:00PM check in time. Not exactly a year later, Gacy is accused again of explicitly ambushing a young kid however the adolescent didn't show up in court, so the charges were dropped. Gacy was known by numerous individuals in his locale to be a devoted volunteer and being dynamic in network legislative issues. His job as "Pogo the Clown" the jokester started in 1975 when Gacy joined a nearby "Dapper Joker" comedian club that routinely performed at raising money occasions. On January 3, 1972, Gacy submits his first murder of Timothy McCoy, a 16-year old kid heading out from Michigan to Omaha. Guaranteeing that McCoy went into his room using a kitchen blade, Gacy gets into a physical fight with McCoy before wounding him over and over in the chest. Subsequent to understanding that McCoy had absentmindedly strolled into the stay with the blade while attempting to get ready breakfast, Gacy covers the body in his creep space. Gacy conceded in the meetings following his capture that slaughtering McCoy gave him a "mind-desensitizing climax", expressing that this homicide was the point at which he "understood passing was a definitive rush" (Cahill and Ewing 349). Just about 2 years after the fact, Gacy submits his second murder of a unidentified adolescent. Gacy choked the kid before stuffing the body in his storage room before covering him (Cahill 349). In 1975, Gacy's business was developing rapidly and his hunger for youngsters developed with it. Gacy regularly attracted youngsters under his work to his home, persuading them to place themselves in binds, and assaulting and tormenting them before choking them (Cahill 169-170). The majority of Gacy's killings occurred somewhere in the range of 1976 and 1978, the first of this time occurring in April 1976. A large number of the young people that were killed during this time were covered in a slither space under Gacy's home. For the rest of the homicides, Gacy confessed to losing five bodies the I-55 extension into the Des Plaines River; notwithstanding, just four of the bodies were ever recuperated (Linedecker 152). In December 1978, Gacy meets Robert Jerome Piest, a 15-year old kid working at a drug store and extends to him an employment opportunity at Gacy's firm. Piest educates his mom regarding this and neglects to restore that night. The Piest family records a missing individual's report and the drug specialist illuminates police that Gacy would no doubt be the man that Jerome addressed about an occupation. When addressed by the police, Gacy denied any contribution in Piest's vanishing. Be that as it may, the police were not persuaded, and Gacy's history of sexual maltreatment and battery provoked the police to look through his home. Among the things found at Gacy's home were a 1975 secondary school class ring with the initials J.A.S., numerous driver's licenses, binds, apparel that was unreasonably little for Gacy, and a receipt for the drug store that Piest had worked at. Through the span of the following scarcely any days, specialists got numerous calls and tips about Gacy's rapes and the puzzling vanishings of Gacy's representatives. The class ring was in the long run followed back to John A. Szyc, one of Gacy's unfortunate casualties in 1977. Futhermore, after inspecting Gacy's vehicle, specialists found a little bunch of strands taking after human hair, which were sent to the labs for additional examination. That equivalent night, search hounds were utilized to distinguish any hint of Piest in Gacy's vehicle, and one of the canines showed that Piest had, truth be told, been available in the vehicle. On December 20, 1977, under the pressure of consistent police reconnaissance and examination, Gacy admits to more than 30 killings and educates his legal advisor and companion where the bodies were covered, both in the creep space and the stream. 26 unfortunate casualties were found in the slither space and 4 in the waterway. Gacy is captured, indicted for 33 homicides, and condemned to death by deadly infusion. He endeavored a madness supplication however was denied, and was executed on May 10, 1994. There were a few measurable pointers that specialists used to attach Gacy to the killings. A portion of these include fiber investigation, dental and radiology records, utilizing the deterioration procedure of the human body, and facial reproduction in recognizing the people in question. Agents discovered strands that looked like human hair in both Gacy's vehicle and close to the creep space where the bodies were covered. Notwithstanding these hair tests, examiners likewise discovered strands that contained hints of Gacy's blood and semen in a similar zone. Blood having a place with the exploited people was found on a portion of the strands, which would later straightforwardly attach Gacy to the violations. The filaments in Gacy's vehicle were dissected by measurable researchers and coordinated Piest's hair tests. Moreover, the pursuit hounds that confirmed that Piest had been in Gacy's vehicle showed this by a "demise response", which told agents that Piest's dead body had been within Gacy's vehicle. Out of Gacy's 33 known unfortunate casualties, just 25 were ever decisively distinguished. A significant number of Gacy's unfortunate casualties had comparative physical depictions and were in this manner difficult to recognize by absolutely asking the general population. To recognize the people in question, examiners went to Betty Pat Gatliff, a pioneer in legal science and facial reproduction. Facial reproduction is the way toward reproducing the facial highlights of a person by utilizing their remaining parts. Certain facial highlights, for example, facial structures, nasal structure, and in general face shape can be valuable in distinguishing an injured individual even long in the afterlife. By utilizing these highlights, and with the assistance of program, scientific agents can make a picture of an individual's face, which is instrumental in recognizing exploited people after their bodies have rotted. Facial recreation should be possible in a few measurements. Two-dimensional facial reproductions is utilized with skull radiographs and depend on pre-passing photos and data. Nonetheless, this isn't really perfect in light of the fact that cranial highlights are not constantly obvious or at the correct scale (Downing). So as to get a practical and progressively precise delineation of the unfortunate casualty's face, a craftsman and a scientific anthropologist are typically vital (Downing). Three-dimensional facial reproduction is finished by figures or high goals, three-dimensional pictures. PC programs can make facial reproductions by controlling examined photos of the remaining parts and use approximations to reproduce facial highlights. These will in general produce results that don't look fake (Reichs and Craig 491). Now and then, examiners will utilize a strategy called superimposition as a method for facial reproduction. Shockingly, it's anything but a normally utilized strategy, as it expects specialists to have some information about the personality of the remaining parts they are managing. By superimposing a photo of a person over the skeletal remains, specialists can check whether the facial highlights line up with the anatomical highlights, enabling them to distinguish an unfortunate casualty. On account of John Wayne Gacy's exploited people, specialists had the option to utilize facial remaking to recognize nine of the bodies found in the slither space. The accompanying realistic shows the facial recreations of these nine unfortunate casualties: Since facial remaking was insufficient to recognize the entirety of the v>GET ANSWER