Provide a 400 – 500 word response . Pls do question then answer.
- Utilize a sufficient number of evidence-informed sources to support your posting (e.g., journal articles, reputable materials from health care organizations like best practice guidelines (like the ” COLLEGE OF NURSES OF ONTARIO , RNAO, CANADIAN NURSES ASSOCIATION” ), key reports). It is expected to go beyond the use of a text book or the course module content
• Apply your answer (e.g. what your learned from the evidence or the question) to a clinical nursing example either from your own practice or what you think a registered nurse might encounter in practice.
• List your references at bottom of your post in APA format
Quality of Original Responses to Discussion Topics
-Your original responses to discussion topics should demonstrate insight and analysis. A high quality response:
• Utilizes research evidence or evidence-informed literature to support ideas. You don’t regurgitate what is on the online module or a text book, you need to go beyond this and use the literature;
• Demonstrates critical thinking and engagement with the course content and the selected evidence to present a thoughtful response to the questions;
• Identifies the problems or issues and addresses them directly;
• Applies the answer to a specific nursing clinical situation and describes why the content/issue is relevant to registered nurses, patients or epidemiology;
• Supports your position, hypothesis, or conclusion with cited sources;
- Applies relevant course concepts; and
• Makes connections to relevant professional, personal, or other real-world experiences, when appropriate.
QUESTION: What are the top 5 cancers in Canada right now? Does this data change according to province (e.g. how does Ontario compare to other provinces in terms of the top 5 cancers). What does this data and the fact that different provinces screen for different cancers mean for Canadians?. Apply your answer (e.g. what your learned from the evidence or the question) to a clinical nursing example either from your own practice or what you think a registered nurse might encounter in practice.
more on the uploaded file. pls check
are like Habermas (German sociologist and philosopher in the tradition of critical theory and pragmatism.) in his account of nature that we will set up false resistance between nature and society. Bhaskar asserted nature is a very special thing, which is not governed by laws, mechanism or structures and he agreed with Rom’s words on nature that “we are free to reinvent it very morning”.Bhaskar added that Rom and Charles are not postmodernist; they do not believe reality, as such, is a social construct. But in their Social Constructivism , their views on social existence reduces to conversation or people. They have given example that one thing can be dependent on multiple factors i.e. Does the food depend just on cook? No. It depends on various factors like utensils, ingredients, resources that he/she is given by the authorities, to which Bhaskar added that the cook must have made more tastier food if there would have been more budget. Here, Bhaskar wanted to prove a point that we are constrained by various factor and we can do better without constraints. Bhaskar then dialect Rom and Charles idea of reinventing society. He criticized that “why Rom and Charles do not reinvent a better kind of society if it’s so easy?” He then further explained with an example of Oxford College, that how fellows can decide how much wine they can drink and how much to store for the next year. By this he means how fellows can change rules time to time. But then an Oxford college is subject to government finance, if privately endowed, to stock market fluctuations. By this example Bhaskar describes how things can be controlled using constraints and how things would act as a very powerful constraint. Bhaskar further explains social structure and causal powers. He explains how agent, factor or vehicle, anything that influences the course of events in some way, is the criteria for causality. He added the people are very special but what people can do in a particular social context must be examined scientifically. He says we should accept the constraining structures if we want human freedom and we should not deny it. To this, Bhaskar dialect Rom’s statement that ‘social structures cannot be reproduced except by human activity’. He further asserted what Rom has said is a fundamental principal and is common to both his(Bhaskar’s) transformational model of social activity and Gidden’s theory of structuration. But there is an important difference between the two models in morality of which cannot be equated, which Maggie Archer in particular has pointed out. Bhaskar, regarding his transformational model asserts how we, humans are shackled of doing anything new and are beset by the preexisting structures, that restrain us. He asserted that fundamental Aristotelian model of society is correct. Efficient causality presupposes material causality; it presupposes a pre-existing material cause. And how we are heavily burdened by cruel presence of the past in this social world. He then talks about the one which validates Rom and Charles’s model, is, the birth of a baby, coming out of the womb, but that too, pre-existing life in the womb and out of the womb as well, pre-exiting thing are ready, fixed, pre-given. Bhaskar’s statement that at any moment of time we are heavily constrained by preexisting structures is a right theory From Bhaskar’s point of view, Charles account of relationship between people and organism lacks the concept of emergence. He stated, people are organism, but there is one thing that differentiate people from being an organism only, emergent powers. In Bhaskar’s word ‘People are organism, but they are organism with emergent powers. He added that our society too, >GET ANSWER