Read the case, “Harley-Davidson Inc. in May 2015” on page 502-514. Use the case analysis format provided below to identify and address the problems and provide several suggested solutions that the Harley-Davidson Inc. executive team can review for possible implementation. Be sure to “identify 2 to 3 problems” and “develop 2 to 3 possible solutions to the problems identified”, and use this as the focus for making your case in the case format.
The principal hypothetical point of view in humanism is called Functional Analysis. Practical Analysis is the hypothesis that society is comprised of various parts that work together to advance solidarity and fairness. Practical Analysis is once in a while alluded to as "functionalism and auxiliary functionalism" (Henslin, 2012, p. 24). Auguste Comte and Herbert Spencer, both remarkable sociologists, built up this hypothesis since they trusted society is comparative as living creatures. By contrasting society with living life forms and their organs, Comte and Spencer inferred that all together for a people or creatures to work legitimately, their organs must cooperate. For this situation, with the goal for society to be prosperous, individuals must function as a group to get it going. Emile Durkheim saw nothing unique about Comte and Spencer's judgment. He likewise focused on the possibility that society is comprised of numerous parts that cooperates to "satisfy their capacities" (Henslin, 2012, p. 25). What contrasts Durkheim from Comte and Herbert is that he recognized society as being "typical" (Henslin, 2012, p. 25) if each piece of society is cooperating as a group. In the event that society does not team up, at that point it is considered an "anomalous or neurotic state" (Henslin, 2012, p. 25). Robert Merton built up a scale to gauge the results of individuals' activity in a general public. In the event that a man accomplishes something that is intentional to society, it is known as a show work. On the off chance that a man accomplishes something that isn't wanted to enable society to transform, it is known as an idle capacity. A negative outcome that makes harm society is known as a brokenness. At the point when functionalists lead their exploration, it is essential that they target expansive gatherings, for example, businesses, associations, or structures in light of the fact that Functional Analysis is a large scale investigation. Full scale level investigation is apparently intended to target "extensive scale designs in the public arena" (Henslin, 2012, p. 28). Circumstances that draw in functionalists' consideration can incorporate "how the parts of society fit together to make the entire and what each part does, and how it adds to society" (Henslin, 2012, p. 25). Utilitarian Analysis is vital on the grounds that this is the territory that enables sociologists to analyze and clarify social marvels that can have a positive or negative effect. The second hypothetical point of view of human science is the Conflict Theory. The Conflict Theory is the possibility that society is made of various gatherings that contend each other for rare assets. The Industrial Revolution that changed Europe has provoked humanist Karl Marx to build up this point of view on social life. Marx trusts that in a general public, a higher class assemble exists and controls the lower class. As per humanist Lewis Coser, he trusts "struggle is well on the way to create among individuals who are in cozy connections" (Henslin, 2012, p. 27). Along these lines, if a negative change happens in the plan on how power or benefit is disseminated in their general public, it could prompt clashes. Strife scholars likewise centers around extensive gatherings when leading exploration since Conflict Theory is a large scale investigation. They target structures, gatherings, nations, and even societies. The quality of the Conflict Theory is that it permits strife scholars to look at the difference in a situation and comprehend the contention that goes along. This permits better comprehension on why occasions, for example, challenges, happen in the public eye today. At the point when strife scholars lead explore, they take a gander at "how contradicting interest gone through each layer of society" (Henslin, 2012, p. 27) or what causes imbalance in a general public. What additionally picks up their consideration is the point at which they attempt to see how the high society controls their energy on the lower class. The third hypothetical viewpoint in humanism is called Symbolic Interactionism. Representative Interactionism is the hypothesis that society utilizes images that have importance to speak with each other and to comprehend their general surroundings. Sociologists, George Herbert Mead and Charles Cooley, collaborated to outline this hypothesis to better comprehend our social life. Emblematic Interactionism is thought to be a small scale investigation. Smaller scale examination includes a little gathering while looking at how an individual uses images to convey and communicate in the public eye. The Conflict Theory is essential since it helps strife interactionists "break down how social life relies upon the ways we characterize ourselves as well as other people" (Henslin, 2012, p. 23). Since Symbolic Interactionism centers around an individual and their association with others, this could help lead them to comprehend social request and change in a general public. What draws in strife interactionalists is the point at which they look at "how individuals bode well out of life and their place in it" (Henslin, 2012, p. 23). They take a gander at how every general public dresses contrastingly or how every social request is unique. In particular, they may think that its fascinating on how images, in spite of having diverse significance in each general public, makes social life. I will apply the hypothetical points of view of humanism to the Dakota Pipeline Protest, an occasion that has been influencing a general public in the U.S. While applying Functional Analysis to the Dakota Pipeline Protest, specialists would first need to recognize what the show capacity of the Dakota pipeline is. The show capacity of the Dakota pipeline venture is to assemble a 1,200-mile-long pipeline, from North Dakota to Illinois, that will transport around 470,000 barrels of unrefined petroleum every day. This is viewed as the most secure approach to transport unrefined petroleum with respect to ecological concerns. The Researchers may likewise be occupied with the dysfunctions of the pipeline. The brokenness of the task is that the pipeline is anticipated to go under Lake Oahe. Any break from the pipeline could cause a colossal ecological impact. Analysts would likewise be interested about the coordinators. They should seriously think about scrutinizing their explanation behind presenting the task, and in addition the advantage of the pipeline. The coordinator of the Dakota pipeline, Energy Transfer Partner LP, is the organization that needs to participate in this business of transporting oil. They got the endorsement to push forward with the task since it is the most secure and the most natural amicable approach to transport oil. At long last, scientists may likewise need to look at what the conceivable idle elements of this undertaking will be. A conceivable inert capacity of the venture is that it can bring down fuel costs in the U.S. also, cause a lift in the economy. This can likewise prompt minimal effort on power bills or air passages. While applying Conflict Theory to the Dakota Pipeline Protest, specialists may need to first inspect who is the high and low class. The high class in this occasion would be the Government authorities and the coordinators of the task. The low class would be viewed as the gathering that opposes the development of the Dakota pipeline. For this situation, the low class would be the Native American clans from everywhere throughout the United States. Scientists would likewise inspect what is the reason to the imbalance that is occurring. As indicated by the Native Americans, they have been living in the territory where the pipeline is anticipated to go over. The Government does not consider the way this is a sacrosanct region for them and that Lake Oahe is life for them. Lake Oahe gives them their day by day water supply and they emphatically trust water is life. Analysts would likewise be interested about what else the Native Americans are attempting to ensure and for what reason do regardless they have the enthusiasm to continue challenging, notwithstanding the physical manhandle from the Government. Other than the water, the Native Americans have precursors who were covered around the territory. It is irritating for them to witness a development going ahead in the territory that is significant since their precursors. At last, clash scholars would need to know precisely if this pipeline is totally important for society and whether unnecessary power ought to be utilized against the protestors. Unreasonable power has been utilized on the Native Americans. Government experts are approved to utilize police canines, pepper shower, and poisonous gas. These individuals are basically securing their territory and they have each privilege to voice their worries. They have the privilege to challenge. Emblematic interactionists would be occupied with concentrate the images that are being utilized by the Native Americans in the Dakota Pipeline Protest. Analysts may likely need to first confirm in the event that it is simply Native Americans that are associated with the challenge. They should talk with people and question their race. They should endeavor to look at how the task is influencing people's general public and to decide whether it is just Native American who are voicing their sentiments. Scientists would talk with people to discover how important the land is to them. It is essential for the specialist to comprehend what the land symbolizes in light of the fact that that is the establishment of the dissent. They may likewise look at if the imagery of the land varies to every individual included. Emblematic interactionists may likewise examine the dress of the Native Americans, and the melodies they sing generally on the development site. In view of the media, some Native Americans wore customary apparel to speak to their predecessors and to demonstrate that they will keep on fighting for them. The customary melodies are sung close to the development site to advance solidarity. The weapons that the Native Americans use to counter the over the top power from the Government may likewise pull in specialists. Rather than utilizing firearms or advanced weapons, the Native Americans are seen utilizing sling shots, steeds, or even their banners as weapons. The specialists should need to talk with people up close and personal and question them on their decision of weapon. In light of recordings from media, it demonstrates that these Native Americans are bringing pride into their way of life.>GET ANSWER