CASE STUDY (FETAL ABNORMALITY below)
Jessica is a 30-year-old immigrant from Mexico City. She and her husband Marco have been in the U.S. for the last three years and have finally earned enough money to move out of their Aunt Maria’s home and into an apartment of their own. They are both hard workers. Jessica works 50 hours a week at a local restaurant and Marco has been contracting side jobs in construction. Six months before their move to an apartment, Jessica finds out she is pregnant.
Four months later, Jessica and Marco arrive at the county hospital, a large, public, nonteaching hospital. A preliminary ultrasound indicates a possible abnormality with the fetus. Further scans are conducted and it is determined that the fetus has a rare condition in which it has not developed any arms, and will not likely develop them. There is also a 25% chance that the fetus may have Down syndrome.
Dr. Wilson, the primary attending physician, is seeing Jessica for the first time, since she and Marco did not receive earlier prenatal care over concerns about finances. Marco insists that Dr. Wilson refrain from telling Jessica the scan results, assuring him that he will tell his wife himself when she is emotionally ready for the news. While Marco and Dr. Wilson are talking in another room, Aunt Maria walks into the room with a distressed look on her face. She can tell that something is wrong and inquires of Dr. Wilson. After hearing of the diagnosis, she walks out of the room wailing loudly and praying aloud.
Marco and Dr. Wilson continue their discussion, and Dr. Wilson insists that he has an obligation to Jessica as his patient and that she has a right to know the diagnosis of the fetus. He furthermore is intent on discussing all relevant factors and options regarding the next step, including abortion. Marco insists on taking some time to think of how to break the news to Jessica, but Dr. Wilson, frustrated with the direction of the conversation, informs the husband that such a choice is not his to make. Dr. Wilson proceeds back across the hall, where he walks in on Aunt Maria awkwardly praying with Jessica and phoning the priest. At that point, Dr. Wilson gently but briefly informs Jessica of the diagnosis, and lays out the option for abortion as a responsible medical alternative, given the quality of life such a child would have. Jessica looks at him and struggles to hold back her tears.
Jessica is torn between her hopes of a better socioeconomic position and increased independence, along with her conviction that all life is sacred. Marco will support Jessica in whatever decision she makes, but is finding it difficult not to view the pregnancy and the prospects of a disabled child as a burden and a barrier to their economic security and plans. Dr. Wilson lays out all of the options but clearly makes his view known that abortion is “scientifically” and medically a wise choice in this situation. Aunt Maria pleads with Jessica to follow through with the pregnancy and allow what “God intends” to take place, and urges Jessica to think of her responsibility as a mother.
Write a 3 pages word analysis of “Case Study: Fetal Abnormality.” Be sure to address the following questions:
1. Which theory or theories are being used by Jessica, Marco, Maria, and Dr. Wilson to determine the moral status of the fetus? Explain.
2. How does the theory determine or influence each of their recommendation for action?
3. What theory do you agree with? How would that theory determine or influence the recommendation for action?
Efficiency or adequacy of an association every now and again endures because of abnormal state of non-attendance and laborer turnover. There is prove that every single concerned proprietor, temporary workers and specialists are occupied with settling issue. This examination inspects the source and size of issue and proposals to lessen it. For this reason we have led meetings and writing overview keeping in mind the end goal to examine the association adequacy. This report depicts a HR administration apparatus for diminishing turnover at Dancom Communication. High worker turnover resembles recoil. It cuts into all that really matters, yet it can be controlled. There are numerous potential foundations for turnover. Absolutely, zone monetary conditions and additionally different factors, for example, work economic situations, impact general turnover rates. In deliberate turnovers are hard to specifically oversee however are intentional turnover that can be overseen. The reason for this writing overview is to dispense the critical factors of our current issue i.e "How does representative's turnover influence the viability of association". With the assistance of these factors we a can survey the factors identified with our concern for organizing hypothetical system. This review incorporates the circumstance which had happened in past with others organizations and how those organizations manage these variable means how they tackled diverse issues. In the wake of finishing writing study and characterizing issue there is have to create structure. In it we attempt to talk about the interrelationship among the factors that are regarded to be vital to the flow of the circumstance being researched. Distinctive factors can influence the viability of association we are thinking about exceptionally vital factors that can impact organization. After the intensive investigation of writing study we deduct a few factors, which can turn into a reason that can impact the deals and remembering we make schematic chart of the hypothetical structure with the goal that the peruser can see and effortlessly grasp the estimated relationship. The exploration plan, which includes a progression of discerning basic leadership decisions, the different issued engaged with the examination configuration, will be talked about here. Like Purpose of the examination, Types of examination, Extent of analyst impedance, Study setting , Measurement and measures, Unit of investigation, Sampling, Time skyline and Data accumulation technique. Yet, the theory explanation, which we will evidence, it will go under theories testing study. This examination that participate in speculations testing as a rule clarify the idea of specific connections, or set up the distinctions among gatherings or the autonomy of at least two factor in a circumstance Causal kind of examination is done, when it is important to build up a complete circumstances and end results relationship, be that as it may, if the analyst essentially needs a minor distinguishing proof of the imperative elements "related with the issue" at that point a connection think about is called. Relationship sort of examination will be appropriate for our exploration, really our speculations is "viable pay has positive effect on hierarchical viability" That's the reason we select this strategy to recognize the vital factor related with the issue. A relationship contemplate is directed in the regular habitat of the association, with the scientist meddling insignificantly with the ordinary stream of work. Hierarchical research should be possible in the regular habitat where work continues typically (no imagined settings) or in manufactured, thought up settings. As we have chosen connection examination technique with least impedance, at that point consequently our investigation setting will be no invented. Its mean our examination will be lead under indigenous habitat. What we will apply in our task that is proportion scale and interim scale in light of the fact that these scales give most extreme exactness in estimating the variable. Despite the fact that the technique we have chosen for examination is relationship that give less exactness as contrast with causal. In this task we chose" people and authoritative" as a unit of investigation, and this determination is coordinate with the meaning of unit of examination.. Why we picked likelihood examining? Since the example we get from likelihood have the nature of agents. We have demonstrated that there is certain connection amongst remuneration and viability.>GET ANSWER