Select at least ONE domestic or international company within your industry choice (for example, Facebook in the
social media industry) and write a paper where you will analyze how your company of choice expanded or
failed to expand internationally. Your analysis will show how the company formed, what problems it faced as it
tried to grow and expand, some of the issues the company faced as it grew using at least two of the concepts
we have talked about in class (for example, labor, competitive strategy, marketing, supply chain, etc.), and
finally, in your conclusion, what is the international outlook for the company’s future (if you do not think your
company will expand internationally, you must give a reason why using the concepts we have studied this
semester.) To help guide you through the writing process, I have included a very specific format for the paper.
- Introduction: Introduce the company—what are they and what do they do? What is its
history? How did they develop? How are they structured (multi- domestic, truly global, etc.)?
- Problem: What problem(s) did the businesses face and what were the primary causes? What additional
factors affected the situation? How did the businesses
Special Notes: Please see Grammar, Spelling and Simple Writing Techniques section beginning at
the bottom of page work to solve the problem(s)? Were the businesses successful in solving the problem(s)?
Why or why not?
- Implications: What are the potential implications of the issues the companies faced? In other words, how did
(or how will) the problem impact thebusinesses?
- Analysis: How can the theories and concepts we have learned in class beapplied to or explain the situation?
- Conclusion: What is the international outlook for the company’s future (if you do not think your company will
expand internationally, you must give a reason why using the concepts we have studied this semester.)
- References Page (One page that is in addition to your 4-6 page requirement): List each of the sources you
used to write your paper at the end of your paper. This page does not count as a page of written text.
Why People Should Not Be Allowed to Keep Exotic Animals as Pets GuidesorSubmit my paper for examination polar bear petWild nature is home for countless species, a significant number of which are intriguing as well as near termination. All through late decades, mankind has put forth a strong attempt so as to forestall the elimination of these creatures, secure the territory of these species, and some way or another limit the negative results of the nearness of people. In any case, there is another issue that has not been given enough consideration to—this issue is keeping fascinating creatures as pets. In spite of the fact that proprietors of extraordinary creatures may accept they are not doing anything terrible, in actuality such a training ought to be denied because of various reasons. Basically nobody, aside from maybe the most extravagant individuals, can give a wild creature all its fundamental conditions. Outlandish creatures have one of a kind needs. For instance, wild tigers need a huge region to wander around in. A venomous Monocled cobra, which can be lawfully purchased in various states for a diminutive $100, will over and again strike when feeling in harm's way. A wildcat can chase a prey multiple times greater than itself. Chimpanzees and different primates require a great deal of room for climbing, and ocean well evolved creatures need tremendous water bowls to swim uninhibitedly. The models are various. These necessities require explicit living conditions—or if nothing else lodging structures. Will a normal American resident bear the cost of keeping an extraordinary pet? For a year or two, yet for 25 or 50 years? Only for a model, the yearly expense of keeping a tiger (in a confine) approaches $6,000. Plainly, being a manager of a wild creature is past the abilities of a normal resident (National Geographic). Your paper is practically all set? Let a specialist have a last perused your paper before giving it in. The Sure Way to Getting a Higher Grade. SEE YOUR GRADE BEFORE Turning in YOUR PAPER. FREE EXPERT HELP In the event that the past passage didn't convince you, think about the threat of organic pollution. As indicated by various assessments, at any rate one of every three reptiles (which are among the most well known fascinating pets—iguanas, for instance) is a host for salmonella and shigella microbes; the general rate with salmonella is likely up to 90 percent. As per information gave by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, 90 percent of imported green iguanas convey new strains of intestinal microscopic organisms. Different species are not more secure. Around 25 percent of both imported and locally reared macaques are accounted for to have had the herpes B infection. Among different sicknesses conveyed and shipped by wild creatures, one should specify such diseases as chlamydia, yaba infection, giardia, tuberculosis, measles, marburg infection, hepatitis A, campylobacteriosis, rabies, streptothricosis, and a ton of different malevolent microorganisms, including worms (ASPCA). What's more, wild creatures can represent a direct physical risk to their proprietors. During the most recent 10 years, there have been many assaults submitted by hostage huge felines, for example, lions and tigers; in perhaps the saddest occurrence, a tiger slaughtered a three-year-old kid, who was its gatekeeper's grandson. For another situation, a Bengal tiger has gnawed off an arm of a four-year-old kid. Since the start of the century, four individuals were pursued down (and slaughtered) by wolf crossovers. This isn't to make reference to the situations when wild creatures assaulted other tamed pets—felines, hounds, etc (PETA). Alongside notable natural issues, for example, the annihilation of species, or the obliteration of rainforests, there is additionally another critical issue: individuals will in general keep outlandish wild creatures as pets. This is a terrible practice, since wild creatures require novel conditions that a normal American can't bear; fascinating creatures convey and transmit colorful infections, which can represent a risk to proprietors; and there were various episodes when a spellbound wild creature assaulted its proprietor, or individuals from their families. This is strong verification for the case that wild fascinating creatures ought not be kept as pets. References "Wild at Home: Exotic Animals as Pets." Nat Geo WILD. N.p., 03 Oct. 2012. Web. 11 Aug. 2015. "Fascinating Animals as Pets." ASPCA. N.p., n.d. Web. 11 Aug. 2015. "Intriguing Animals as 'Pets'" PETA. N.p., n.d.>GET ANSWER