Your company’s recruiting team collected candidate data on a test battery composed of several selection assessments or procedures. Your task is to review available information about the current selection process, evaluate the selection process to determine the extent to which it is meeting the organization’s needs, provide your expert opinion on the extent to which the selection process is legally defensible, and offer recommendations for changes to the selection process. The outcome of this assignment is a technical report for the HR leaders in your organization.
Note that there is no one best way to design a selection process, as multiple factors should be considered and judgment is involved. This assignment is intended to give you an opportunity to carefully consider several types of common challenges that arise with selection processes and to think through possible process improvements based on what you learned in the course. As such, your review and recommendations should be well reasoned and supported by the relevant scholarly sources (for example, the course text, peer-reviewed journal articles, book chapters, and professional standards such as the SIOP “Principles for the Validation and Use of Selection Procedures”).
In a 5–7 page technical report:
• State the purpose of the report and provide a brief description of the available information about the selection process that informed your evaluation (what type of information is available, when it was collected, et cetera.)
• Evaluate the selection process with respect to the following, providing support from the scholarly literature and professional standards (for example, SIOP principles):
o Job-relatedness: Evaluate the sufficiency of the available evidence to support the job-relatedness of each selection assessment.
o Professional guidelines: What patterns are you observing based on the results? What is working well and what challenges are present with consideration to the following professional guidelines for selection procedures?
Validity: Prediction of important performance and business outcomes.
Legal defensibility: Adverse impact risk for protected groups (for example, women, candidates age 40 and older, or ethnic groups).
Candidate reactions (the candidate experience).
Practical considerations (for example, cost-benefit, or feedback from key stakeholders such as recruiters or hiring managers).
• Make recommendations for the selection process, addressing each of the following questions posed by the business leaders:
o Do you recommend retaining the assessment battery in its current form or making changes? Why?
If you would make any changes to the selection battery, provide recommendations for what you would retain and what changes or next steps you would take to address the challenges that you identified in your evaluation of the job-relatedness and professional guidelines for validity, adverse impact, the candidate experience, and practical considerations.
o What changes, if any, would you recommend making to the way selection decisions are made based on the selection assessments (for example, top-down selection, multiple hurdle, or using cutoff scores)?
o How do you anticipate your recommended changes will improve the alignment of the selection process with the organization’s objectives?
Support your recommendations based on scholarly literature and professional standards for best practices in selection and assessment (for example, SIOP principles).
Dante Alighieri played a critical role in the literature world through his poem Divine Comedy that was written in the 14th century. The poem contains Inferno, Purgatorio, and Paradiso. The Inferno is a description of the nine circles of torment that are found on the earth. It depicts the realms of the people that have gone against the spiritual values and who, instead, have chosen bestial appetite, violence, or fraud and malice. The nine circles of hell are limbo, lust, gluttony, greed and wrath. Others are heresy, violence, fraud, and treachery. The purpose of this paper is to examine the Dante’s Inferno in the perspective of its portrayal of God’s image and the justification of hell.
In this epic poem, God is portrayed as a super being guilty of multiple weaknesses including being egotistic, unjust, and hypocritical. Dante, in this poem, depicts God as being more human than divine by challenging God’s omnipotence. Additionally, the manner in which Dante describes Hell is in full contradiction to the morals of God as written in the Bible. When god arranges Hell to flatter Himself, He commits egotism, a sin that is common among human beings (Cheney, 2016). The weakness is depicted in Limbo and on the Gate of Hell where, for instance, God sends those who do not worship Him to Hell. This implies that failure to worship Him is a sin.
God is also depicted as lacking justice in His actions thus removing the godly image. The injustice is portrayed by the manner in which the sodomites and opportunists are treated. The opportunists are subjected to banner chasing in their lives after death followed by being stung by insects and maggots. They are known to having done neither good nor bad during their lifetimes and, therefore, justice could have demanded that they be granted a neutral punishment having lived a neutral life. The sodomites are also punished unfairly by God when Brunetto Lattini is condemned to hell despite being a good leader (Babor, T. F., McGovern, T., & Robaina, K. (2017). While he commited sodomy, God chooses to ignore all the other good deeds that Brunetto did.
Finally, God is also portrayed as being hypocritical in His actions, a sin that further diminishes His godliness and makes Him more human. A case in point is when God condemns the sin of egotism and goes ahead to commit it repeatedly. Proverbs 29:23 states that “arrogance will bring your downfall, but if you are humble, you will be respected.” When Slattery condemns Dante’s human state as being weak, doubtful, and limited, he is proving God’s hypocrisy because He is also human (Verdicchio, 2015). The actions of God in Hell as portrayed by Dante are inconsistent with the Biblical literature. Both Dante and God are prone to making mistakes, something common among human beings thus making God more human.
To wrap it up, Dante portrays God is more human since He commits the same sins that humans commit: egotism, hypocrisy, and injustice. Hell is justified as being a destination for victims of the mistakes committed by God. The Hell is presented as being a totally different place as compared to what is written about it in the Bible. As a result, reading through the text gives an image of God who is prone to the very mistakes common to humans thus ripping Him off His lofty status of divine and, instead, making Him a mere human. Whether or not Dante did it intentionally is subject to debate but one thing is clear in the poem: the misconstrued notion of God is revealed to future generations.
References
Babor, T. F., McGovern, T., & Robaina, K. (2017). Dante’s inferno: Seven deadly sins in scientific publishing and how to avoid them. Addiction Science: A Guide for the Perplexed, 267.
Cheney, L. D. G. (2016). Illustrations for Dante’s Inferno: A Comparative Study of Sandro Botticelli, Giovanni Stradano, and Federico Zuccaro. Cultural and Religious Studies, 4(8), 487.
Verdicchio, M. (2015). Irony and Desire in Dante’s” Inferno” 27. Italica, 285-297.
Technical Report: Evaluation and Recommendations for Candidate Selection Process
To: HR Leadership From: [Your Name], Selection Process Analyst Date: [Current Date] Subject: Evaluation and Recommendations for Candidate Selection Process
1. Purpose and Available Information:
This report aims to evaluate the current candidate selection process, assess its effectiveness in meeting organizational needs, determine its legal defensibility, and provide actionable recommendations for improvement. The evaluation is based on the following information:
- Candidate Data: Data collected from the current selection test battery, including scores on various assessments and procedures.
- Demographic Data: Information on candidate demographics, including age, gender, and ethnicity.
- Job Analysis Documentation: Records detailing the essential functions, knowledge, skills, and abilities (KSAs) required for successful job performance.
- Performance Data: Existing performance evaluations of employees hired using the current selection process.
- Feedback: Qualitative feedback from recruiters, hiring managers, and candidates regarding the selection process.
- Date Collected: Data has been collected over the previous 12 months.
2. Evaluation of the Selection Process:
Technical Report: Evaluation and Recommendations for Candidate Selection Process
To: HR Leadership From: [Your Name], Selection Process Analyst Date: [Current Date] Subject: Evaluation and Recommendations for Candidate Selection Process
1. Purpose and Available Information:
This report aims to evaluate the current candidate selection process, assess its effectiveness in meeting organizational needs, determine its legal defensibility, and provide actionable recommendations for improvement. The evaluation is based on the following information:
- Candidate Data: Data collected from the current selection test battery, including scores on various assessments and procedures.
- Demographic Data: Information on candidate demographics, including age, gender, and ethnicity.
- Job Analysis Documentation: Records detailing the essential functions, knowledge, skills, and abilities (KSAs) required for successful job performance.
- Performance Data: Existing performance evaluations of employees hired using the current selection process.
- Feedback: Qualitative feedback from recruiters, hiring managers, and candidates regarding the selection process.
- Date Collected: Data has been collected over the previous 12 months.
2. Evaluation of the Selection Process:
Job-Relatedness:
- Each selection assessment must demonstrate a clear link to the KSAs identified in the job analysis.
- Current Findings: Based on initial review, there is some documentation that the assessments were chosen based on the job analysis. However, a comprehensive validation study is needed to provide concrete evidence of criterion-related validity.
- Support: SIOP “Principles for the Validation and Use of Selection Procedures” emphasize the importance of demonstrating job-relatedness through validation studies.
2.2 Professional Guidelines:
- Validity:
- The current data provides limited evidence of predictive validity. A more rigorous validation study is needed to determine the extent to which the assessments accurately predict job performance.
- Patterns: Initial data suggests that some assessments are correlating with performance data, but further statistical analysis is required.
- Challenges: Lack of a formal validation study.
- Legal Defensibility:
- Adverse impact analysis is crucial to identify potential disparities in selection rates among protected groups.
- Current Findings: Initial review shows some differences in selection rates between ethnic groups. Further statistical testing is needed to determine if these differences are statistically significant and constitute adverse impact.
- Challenges: Potential for adverse impact, which could lead to legal challenges.
- Candidate Reactions:
- The candidate experience significantly impacts employer branding and candidate acceptance rates.
- Current Findings: Feedback suggests that some candidates find the test battery lengthy and cumbersome.
- Challenges: Negative candidate reactions could deter qualified applicants.
- Practical Considerations:
- Cost-benefit analysis is essential to ensure the selection process is efficient and effective.
- Current Findings: The current process is relatively costly due to the length of the test battery and the time required for administration and scoring.
- Challenges: High cost and time commitment.
- What is working: The current process does provide some data that can be used to predict job performance.
- What challenges are present: The high cost, length of the process, and possible adverse impact are all challenges.
3. Recommendations:
3.1 Retaining or Changing the Assessment Battery:
- I recommend making changes to the current assessment battery.
- Rationale: The current battery has several challenges including possible adverse impact, high cost, and a long candidate experience.
- Recommendations:
- Conduct a comprehensive validation study to establish the criterion-related validity of each assessment.
- Perform an adverse impact analysis to identify and address potential disparities in selection rates.
- Streamline the test battery by removing redundant or low-validity assessments.
- Consider incorporating more realistic job previews and work sample tests to enhance job-relatedness and candidate experience.
- Next steps: Begin the validation study as soon as possible, and begin to collect data on a smaller amount of tests, to see if a shorter battery is as effective.
3.2 Selection Decision Methods:
- I recommend transitioning from a top-down selection approach to a multiple hurdle approach with cutoff scores.
- Rationale: A multiple hurdle approach allows for the elimination of unqualified candidates early in the process, reducing the burden on both candidates and the organization. Cutoff scores should be established based on job analysis and validation data to ensure that only qualified candidates proceed to the next stage.
- Example: A cutoff score can be set on a cognitive ability test, and if a candidate does not meet the score, they are removed from the process.
3.3 Alignment with Organizational Objectives:
- The recommended changes will improve the alignment of the selection process with the organization’s objectives by:
- Enhancing the validity and job-relatedness of the selection process, leading to improved hiring decisions.
- Reducing the risk of adverse impact, ensuring legal defensibility and promoting diversity.
- Improving the candidate experience, enhancing employer branding, and attracting top talent.
- Streamlining the process and reducing costs, improving efficiency and resource utilization.
- By conducting a validation study, the company will have quantifiable data, to support the use of the selection battery.
- By using a multiple hurdle approach, the company will save time, and money.
- By reducing the length of the test battery, the candidate experience will be improved.
4. Conclusion:
By implementing the recommended changes, the organization can enhance the effectiveness and efficiency of its selection process, ensure legal defensibility, and improve the candidate experience. This will ultimately lead to better hiring decisions and contribute to the organization’s overall success.
