Thank you for agreeing to talk to me about the discussion we had the other pay about assigning patient load. As I started to say in the meeting but got interrupted, it is that I really don’t like the new plan that we have. I like the old one better and I don’t understand why we need to change.
I think that they expressed one concern about visiting patients in Iron Ridge. And that is the key as they were with high crime rate. We all recognize this issue. I do understand, but the new patient assignment scheme is meant to match you with a patient who will most benefit from your specialty and not where you live geographically.
There are many patients in Iron Ridge who have diabetes that need your expertise. [BLANK_AUDIO] Well, I really do love my patients, and I don’t hold it against them that they live in a bad part of town. But frankly, I’m afraid. Every night when I watch the news, there’s somebody that’s been involved in a shooting or a carjacking.
I talked to my husband about it, and he said that if you insist I go over there, he wants me to quit because it’s not safe. [BLANK_AUDIO] I have an idea I would like to explore with you. What if we sent an escort to accompany you on your visit?
Would this help you feel safer in that neighborhood? Sure it would, but do you think that’s realistic? The last I heard, we didn’t have any money to give us nurses raises and bonuses. I mean, do we even have the budget for something like security? It’s realistic as long as I can justify the safety of our nurses.
Let’s say the cost is a barrier to this scheme. What do you think? [BLANK_AUDIO] Well let me think about it. I need to talk to my husband too. I can’t decide right now. But you’ve given me something to consider. [MUSIC] At times the needs of our families conflict with our work responsibilities. Could this possibly be the underlying issue here?
*****ANSWER THE FOLLOWING DISCUSSION QUESTIONS ******
Explain the conflict resolution skills displayed by the leader in the scenario. On a scale of 1-10, how would you rate those of the leader. How might earlier collaboration have been beneficial? Some organizations utilize non Registered Nurses in the Case Manager role. What additional skills, knowledge and attributes would the BSN-prepared Registered Nurse bring to case management in this scenario?
Will Man and Machine Exist Together? Disclaimer: This work has been presented by an understudy. This isn't a case of the work composed by our expert scholarly journalists. You can see tests of our expert work here. Any suppositions, discoveries, ends or proposals communicated in this material are those of the writers and don't really mirror the perspectives of UK Essays. Distributed: Tue, 02 Jan 2018 In John Durkin (2003's) article Man and Machine: I think about whether we can exist together, Durkin guesses on the capacity of a conceivable concurrence among human and smart machine. The title of the article is deceiving in that Durkin discusses machines existing with people yet what he truly implies if whether computerized reasoning (AI) competent machines and people can exist together. The idea of AI is charming and the likelihood that natural insight existing together with motorized knowledge is enticing and the repercussions of such conjunction, or its options, are significant. Lamentably Durkin's principle sources are popular culture films and he bargains more with feelings of dread and doubt than the genuine probability of any concurrence or what frames this may take. Durkin utilizes HAL 9000, a star of 2001: A Space Odyssey, from the motion picture adjustment of Clarke's short story The Sentinel written in 1948 for instance of how machine knowledge can guard its very own advantages and mischief people in self-protection. In the motion picture the group of researchers endeavor to deactivate a conscious PC which reacts by executing those attempting to deactivate/slaughter it. This exposes inquiries on the privileges of wise creatures and what connection privileges of other insight ought to need to human knowledge. The film AI: Artificial Intelligence is additionally utilized by Durkin as an idea where he repeats the tale of the motion picture, calling attention to a keen machine can imitate human feelings to the point where people react as though the machine were one of our own. David, the primary character in the story, does not fall back on savagery like HAL 9000, but rather encounters human feelings (or copies of) and acknowledges his dismissal by mankind. From this the topic of what rights clever creatures ought to have and by what method should moral benchmarks be produced to treat AI. Since David is outwardly unclear from a human tyke, what are the characteristics that separate man and machine? What is human? People outline themselves from whatever remains of the regular world by knowledge. Generally people have positioned significance dependent on capacity to reason, with elements without the capacity to indicate insight that we perceive as being second rate and people rank them all things considered in our progressive system of life. It is alright to slaughter an apparently unintelligent creepy crawly however cries are heard when one murders a dolphin or elephant which people consider more astute. Insight is now and then observed as synonymous with consciousness and awareness is something that people regard and esteem. What precisely characterizes human insight? What do our minds have that machines can't imitate? A mind is an organic creation of synthetic substances and natural issue which is immensely better than all other known life for its unparalleled capacity to process data and help survival. Logical examinations on human sentiments, feelings and contemplations have possessed the capacity to delineate in the cerebrum that are dynamic when we feel respond to fear, to delight and an assortment of different feelings. Feelings, when thought domain about the inconspicuous soul, are currently obvious as electrochemical responses. In the event that we can separate the concoction segments and find electronic analogs machines will have the capacity to encounter similar feelings. To make AI one needs to locate the arrangement of working parameters the human cerebrum pursues and copy them in an electronic organization. David, from the motion picture AI, is such a machine. The programming of sentiments and feelings into AI combined with the advancement of humanoid bodies will start to blue the line among man and machine. An issue of insight The uncertainty of the conjunction of human insight and machine knowledge summons an end product question of whether human knowledge and some other knowledge could gently exist together. In the event that a canny outsider species were found would people have the capacity to exist together with this species? Durkin noticed that insightful machines are thought by some to be a risk to human's legitimate imposing business model of balanced idea so it appears that the inquiry ought to be extended to the capacity of people to whether human knowledge and some other smart structures can exist together. The distinction between experiencing an additional earthly insight and machine knowledge is that people would be the makers of the last sort. On the off chance that we are discussing conjunction of knowledge there is no motivation to imagine that outsider, human and machine insight would be entirely different from each other. Durkin anyway centers around machine insight which doesn't really mirror the genuine issues of existing together knowledge. Recorded point of reference Each time human social orders have experienced other wise social orders there has constantly been strife. Take for example mankind's history where developments have experienced each other out of the blue. The gathering of European culture and Native American culture in North and South America this is the nearest simple we need to wise creatures finding other astute creatures. Despite the fact that the physical shape was the equivalent, the way of life were extraordinary and both were careless in regards to the nearness of the other insightful creatures until the experience. This gathering of wise gatherings finished in a debacle for the locals of the Americas with the Europeans abusing and overwhelming them. Very little stays of the Native culture in the Americas after European control. This example is rehashed from the beginning of time as one savvy society rules one saw to be second rate. The general public commanded is regularly the mechanically mediocre one. Despite the fact that this association between insightful social orders isn't the equivalent as people making machine knowledge it demonstrates what people social orders are equipped for with regards to managing other shrewd gatherings. Wellsprings of Conflict Clashes between gatherings of people have numerous causes. Religious contrasts, ideological contrasts and struggle over assets are viewed as the real explanations behind fighting. Wellsprings of contention for people and machine insight are harder to stick point yet they likely will be the equivalent as human versus human clashes. In the event that machine knowledge can turn into a working societal gathering they will require assets much the equivalent as people. Land, metals and vitality will all be essential for the capacity of the two gatherings and clashes could without much of a stretch emerge. This is all subject to the possibility that machine insight will create to frame social orders and look for a status and significance of requirements equivalent to that of people. This is the thing that David from AI looks for however people don't allow it to him as he looks for acknowledgment from a human family. Regardless of whether people will in the end is an inquiry that can't be replied here. There is no room in this paper for theory on potential philosophies and religions of machine insight. Anyway it is very nearly an assurance that these qualities in people will have clashes with the development of a human-like AI. Methods of conjunction Conjunction can take numerous structures. At the point when Durkin discusses conjunction he talks generally of a needy relationship where people are dependent on machines and machine insight for survival. He states … we won't have the capacity to kill our clever machines since we would depend excessively on the choices that they give. Now the machines will be in powerful control. This is thinking about just a single type of concurrence of machine and human knowledge and misrepresents the method of control. Durkin's type of conjunction is a plausible one toward the starting stages in the improvement of AI. People will create machines to computerize errands to free people from doing them. A case of that in this day and age is the advancement of spam email channels. This is programming that we as of now depend on however it may not be AI, the point it to create it to brilliantly deal with the mail and settle on choices dependent on rationale and thinking. A presence where AI is subservient to human knowledge has different degrees it is conceivable to program programming to be canny yet at the same time subservient and it is conceivable to just build up the AI to the point where it can at present be controlled. Another shape would be one of correspondence where people and machine insight exist together as equivalent accomplices. In the event that we are to expect that AI will keep on creating to the point where it copies human knowledge there will come a period where machine insight will look to escape from subservience and serve its own advantages. As a smart element the machine will have self-intrigue and want to misbehave said interests.It is here that machine and man would experience the kinds of contention made reference to beforehand as machines act to their greatest advantage to anchor assets to address their issues. This circumstance could be a perilous one with fighting being a probability between clashing vested parties. A war among man and astute machine could be mankind's most noteworthy trial of survival and the outcome might be another kind of concurrence where man is the subservient one. Bringing forth AI With regards to the improvement of machine knowledge people will be its modelers. This implies is would be conceivable to make programming with specific particulars to help in shielding people from potential mischief. This would require making ââ‚¬ëœlaws' that the AI would be unequipped for rupturing. Praised sci-fi author Isaac Asimov made such laws in his books for his robots to pursue. These laws were pointed>GET ANSWER