When looking for information about a particular issue, how often do you try to resist biases toward your own
point of view? This assignment asks you to engage in this aspect of critical thinking by playing the
“Believing Game.” The Believing Game is about making the effort to “believe” – or at least consider – the
reasons for an opposing view on an issue.
The assignment is divided into two (2) parts.
In Part I of the assignment (due Week 2), you will first read a book excerpt about critical thinking processes:
“The Believing Game and How to Make Conflicting Opinions More Fruitful” at
http://www.procon.org/sourcefiles/believinggame.pdf. Next, you will review the Procon.org Website in order
to gather information. Then, you will engage in prewriting to examine your thoughts.
Note: In Part II of the assignment (due Week 4), you will write an essay geared towards synthesizing your
Part I – Prewriting: Follow the instructions below for this prewriting activity. Use complete sentences and
adhere to standard rules of English grammar, punctuation, mechanics, and spelling.
1. Select one (1) of the approved topics from the www.procon.org Website and state your position on the
2. From the Procon.org Website, identify three (3) premises (reasons) listed under either the Pro or Con
section – whichever section opposes your position.
3.For each of the three (3) premises (reasons) that oppose your position on the issue, answer these “believing”
questions suggested by Elbow:
a. What’s interesting or helpful about this view?
b. What would I notice if I believed this view?
c. In what sense or under what conditions might this idea be true?”
The paper should follow guidelines for clear and organized writing:
Include an introductory paragraph and concluding paragraph.
Address main ideas in body paragraphs with a topic sentence and supporting sentences.
Adhere to standard rules of English grammar, punctuation, mechanics, and spelling.
Your assignment must follow these formatting requirements:
This course requires use of Strayer Writing Standards (SWS). The format is different than other Strayer
University courses. Please take a moment to review the SWS documentation for details.
The specific course learning outcomes associated with this assignment are:
Identify the informal fallacies, assumptions, and biases involved in manipulative appeals and abuses of
Create written work utilizing the concepts of critical thinking.
Use technology and information resources to research issues in critical thinking skills and informal
Basic Annotated Bibliography of key writings concentrated on Annette Lareau's reserach Social analysts have focused on the significance of understanding the social stratification and its effect on kids and guardians overall (Lareau A, 1999). Annette Lareau is an educator of Sociology at University of Pennsylvania. She accomplished her PhD in Sociology from University of California, Berkley. Her pivotal research includes, examining questions like the impact of social stratification on families. She has done considerable hands on work looking at the lives of American individuals. She has concentrated on the effect of social basic powers, child rearing styles like coordinated development, instructive imbalances and on the off chance that they take an interest towards molding indispensable parts of youngsters' lives. She has composed numerous books and articles worrying on how class can represent the deciding moment families' present and future. Her work adds to expand our comprehension towards the class framework. The assemblage of Annette Lareau's work that I have picked surveys imperative issues in American culture, which impacts kids, guardians and families all in all. It examines crucial issues like the job of class framework in white collar class, common laborers and poor families in bringing up their kids, their day by day lives, shifting child rearing styles and their job in youngsters' present and future prospects. Lareau, A., 2011. Unequal childhoods: Class, race, and family life. College of California Press. Annette Lareau's book 'Unequal Childhoods with a refresh 10 years after the fact' is a stage forward in grasping the significance of learning and understanding the effect of class framework on family lives and child rearing styles in African American and White families and is an incredible exertion to fill in the hole in pertinent research considers. She examined how parental practices vary among White, Black, working class, average workers and poor families and the job it plays in molding youngsters' future definitively. Annette demonstrated that class framework assumes a crucial job in American families' lives and revealed the practices associated with multiplication of disparities in the general public. The creator performed top to bottom examinations with 12 distinct families utilizing 'member perception' as her contemplating approach giving point by point data about the families. Youngsters taking an interest in the investigation were matured 9-10 years of age. As a feature of the exploration, the creator with the help of her partners went through around multi month with the families and accumulated point by point data about them. The exploration included after the members to afterschool exercises, specialist's visit and invested energy at their homes. A key point that Lareau's ethnographic examination demonstrated is a specific child rearing methodology called 'purposeful development'. While visiting member families, she saw that Black and White working class families are particularly associated with encouraging their youngsters to accomplish their objectives. They support, rouse and screen their youngsters' scholastic accomplishments and assume a functioning job in their lives. These guardians were constantly keen on tuning in to their kids' voice and did not dishearten them to demonstrate their conclusions. Subsequently, these kids turned out to be more positive about talking their brains, which helped them to build up their general certainty, confidence and improvement. Conversely, the raising style of youngsters having a place with average workers and poor families in both Black and White families were constrained because of absence of assets. They depended on schools to deal with their kids and gave their kids additional opportunity to play. She differentiated these two child rearing methodologies and found that both of these child rearing styles were useful, however kids having a place with working class were more fruitful in schools. She contends that African American families confront racial separation in numerous zones e.g. business and live in racially isolated neighborhoods however strangely, White and African-American working class families pursue the equivalent child rearing style and there was no perception of racial separation. A selective point that Lareau watched was the conversational contrasts among guardians and kids e.g. kids from white collar class families were generally associated with drawing in discussions with grown-ups, which helped these kids to pick up certainty. Though, the guardians of kids from working and poor families demonstrated expert and the youngsters for the most part indicated consistence and once in a while took an interest in connecting with discussions with grown-ups. These distinctions indicate how white collar class youngsters obtain certainty and handle the capacity to request while average workers kids are not exceptionally requesting. Taking everything into account, this examination demonstrated that class matters more than race however gave restricted discourse on the effect of race in kids' lives and their future and comes up short on the data on the job of more distant families in working class youthful grown-ups. Lareau perceives that there is a hole in concentrate the impacts of class in youngsters' lives, positive child rearing systems and imbalance because of class and thusly calls for inside and out research in this field. Lareau has played out a survey on her investigation by visiting the families once more. Youngsters engaged with the investigation are presently youthful grown-ups. She met these youthful grown-ups their kin and guardians. Lareau found that the significance of social class, she had seen when these youngsters were more youthful (10yrs) old created with time. White collar class guardians continued assuming a functioning job in their kids' lives regardless of them moving far from their homes. These youthful grown-ups kept looking for parent's direction. Their folks were hugely associated with taking care of circumstances to expand their development potential. Actually, guardians having a place with regular workers and poor families considered their youngsters currently 'adults' and the youthful grown-ups consented to this view. More distant families assume an essential job in forming youngsters having a place with regular workers and poor family kids. All in all, white collar class youngsters achieved more instructive accomplishments than the average workers and poor family kids. Child rearing styles shape kids' lives as they develop into youthful grown-ups to set them up for autonomous fruitful lives. By and large, an astounding and illuminating investigation. Lareau, A., 2002. Undetectable disparity: Social class and childrearing in dark families and white families. American sociological survey, pp.747-776. This exploration thinks about the impacts of social class, culture, race and their association by researching the capacity and commitment of social class framework in kids ages of 7-10 years of age. Utilizing an ethnographic information, Lareau plans to ponder the affiliations and associations among Black and White guardians, their youngsters and qualifications in childrearing strategies. She found that class contrasts are more discernible than racial contrasts and that child rearing styles are an approach to imitate class-based preferences. Lareau thinks about two diverse child rearing ways to deal with learn and report their advantages and inconveniences. Working class guardians urged their kids to be exceedingly engaged with extracurricular exercises utilizing a 'deliberate worldview' to empower and build up their abilities and capacities. Unexpectedly, regular workers guardians utilized the childrearing strategy called 'achievement of normal development' worldview. This technique includes giving, love and care for the youngsters, giving them a considerable measure of opportunity and unregulated entertainment time and space. Accordingly, Lareau saw that white collar class youngsters thought that it was anything but difficult to adjust to the school condition, as they pursued similar desires and organized exercises at home. These guardians energized, commended and regarded their youngsters' desires and these positive components were a progressing highlight of white collar class families. Lareau contends that the scope of exercises impact family lives. The significance of organized exercises results in frail family and social bonds. The creator calls attention to that as white collar class youngsters were so bustling taking an interest in after school exercises they scarcely had whenever to visit their more distant families. Be that as it may, this investigation included restricted; talk about kids' association with more distant families e.g. grandparents. Another imperative point that Laruea brought up in this exploration is the utilization of dialect. She saw that white collar class youngsters occupied with solid talks with their folks and different experts while, common laborers and poor families did not include in proceeded with exchanges as often as possible with their folks. All guardians and youngsters were engaged with having discussions with experts, however working class kids were more skilful in holding discussions with others. The investigation demonstrates that financial status can impact social associations. Youngsters from working and poor family foundation has a more extensive scope of social associations in contrast with the white collar class kids. The creator appeared, that race does not appear to have an awesome effect in forming kids' lives. Albeit Black guardians were progressively stressed over their youngsters' lives outside because of racial issues. Taking everything into account, this is an edifying ethnographical examination, with expressive and illuminative information, however as it is focused on a little example along these lines; it is extremely hard to sum up the outcomes to open. Lareau, A., 2000. Social class and the every day lives of kids, An examination from the United States. Adolescence, 7(2), pp.155-171. Laurae strived to investigate the social class contrasts by outlining and playing out a point by point and extensive examination in contrast with studies performed in the past where kids' exploration was constrained to the settings of schools and families. Youngsters' out of school exercises impact working class guardians' live>GET ANSWER