In February 2020, Mr Alex Bridge, domiciled in England, concluded with the tour operator Baltic
Welcome, established in Estonia, a contract combining a cruise between Dover and Tallinn, a
three-day stay in Tallinn and a flight from Tallinn to London. The contract was concluded
electronically and in English via the website of the tour operator.
In April 2020, Baltic Welcome informed Alex Bridge that the contract was cancelled due to the
COVID-19 outbreak. On 15th November 2020, Mr Bridge issued proceedings in England
against Baltic Welcome. He asks for a full refund of the price paid by him to Baltic Welcome,
and seeks compensation for the loss of amenity he suffered.
Baltic Welcome challenges the jurisdiction of the English court, submitting that the services
included in the contract were to be provided in Estonia which is also the place of the defendant’s
domicile. They also argues that Estonia is a more appropriate place for the trial to take place
because Estonian law must apply to the merits of the dispute.
Advise Mr Bridge (a) on the issue of jurisdiction as well as (b) on the issue of applicable law.
(Sub-questions (a) and (b) are worth equal marks)
- ESSAY QUESTION
‘This Convention seeks to promote access to justice globally through enhanced judicial
cooperation, which will reduce risks and costs associated with cross-border legal relations and
dispute resolution. As a result, implementation of the Convention should facilitate rule-based
Sample Solution
0 more than four years. What’s more, the school can’t prevent them from acquiring – despite the fact that when the understudy defaults on the advance, the school is considered responsible. It additionally makes one wonder, is a school training justified, despite all the trouble? Free school can possibly undermine tirelessness. Right now, most universities charge educational cost when an understudy rehashes a course. We should talk for a moment about the elements on a school grounds. At the point when looked with testing and thorough classes, a few understudies will acknowledge they are in peril of coming up short and play the “W” card. As in pulling back from the class. Contingent upon the reviewing framework at the school/college, a “W” evaluation may not factor into the evaluation point normal estimation. Be that as it may, pulling back from a class has money related consequences. In any event up to this point. When educational cost turns out to be free, I anticipate expanded maltreatment of pulling back from classes. All things considered, the monetary motivating force to complete what you begin has been expelled. Not withstanding the projections for understudy credit default increments and constancy diminishes there are likewise monetary and “decision” contemplations. As of now, forthcoming understudies select an establishment of their decision and afterward finance educational cost with gifts, grants, advances, and reserve funds. This enables private schools and open universities to seek a similar understudy, and understudies audit money related guide grants and at last settle on choices dependent on funds – as well as fit. For a few understudies, being a piece of an entering first year recruit class of 8,000 understudies might overpower, and sitting in an address lobby with 200 may not be their favored method for learning. These are the sorts of understudies who are as of now pulled in to littler private establishments where swarms are littler and educator connection is increasingly close to home. What’s more, most much of the time, these are private schools and colleges that don’t get immediate help from the state or g>
GET ANSWER 