Creativity and innovation are essential to an organization’s success, and both should be infused into every aspect of a business. Companies with creative and innovative employees keep up with industry changes and have a competitive advantage. Human Resources (HR) can help to foster a workplace’s culture. For this assignment, assume the role of HR Manager. The HR Director has asked you to define the ideal qualities of the employees and leadership for cultivating a culture of creativity and innovation. Your findings will be used to develop training and development for new and/or existing employees and leaders.
Choose one of the following:
Option 1: Imagine you are creating a new and innovative company in the travel or retail industry.
Option 2: Use a company you are interested in from the travel or retail industry.
Write a 3–5 page paper in which you:
Identify which option you chose and indicate the products and/or services the company provides.
Describe the ideal qualities of a leader who inspires a culture of creativity and innovation.
Describe the steps a leader may take to be a contributor to a culture of creativity and innovation.
Identify two important leadership qualities of an individual aspiring to be a leader.
Describe barriers to fostering a culture of creativity and innovation from a leadership and employee perspective.
Discuss ways that the leadership may coach and support employees with overcoming the barriers.
example, actors which theorists leave out and the time gap between traditional theorists and modernists. Most importantly, there can be no definitive theory of the just war, because every single person has a different interpretation of this theory, given its normativity. However, the theory gives a rough display of how we should proceed in times of tension and conflict, crucially the aim of a just war: ‘peace and security of the commonwealth’ (Begby et al, 2006b, Page 310). Overall, this theory is suitable to use but cannot ever be seen as a natural guide since it’s normatively theorised. To answer the question, the essay is comprised of 3 sections. Jus ad bellum The starting section covers jus ad bellum, the conditions debating whether an action is justifiably acceptable to cause a war (Frowe (2011), Page 50). Firstly, Vittola discusses one of the just causes of war, most importantly, is when harm is inflicted but he does mention the harm does not lead to war, it depends on the extent or proportionality, another condition to jus ad bellum (Begby et al (2006b), Page 314). Frowe, however, argues the idea of “just cause” based on “Sovereignty” which refers to the protection of political and territorial rights, along with human rights. In contemporary view, this view is more complicated to answer, given the rise of globalisation. Similarly, it is difficult to measure proportionality, particularly in war, because not only that there is an epistemic problem in calculating, but again today’s world has developed (Frowe (2011), Page 54-6).>GET ANSWER