Your task is to interview an individual of your choice involved in the criminal justice system: a police officer, attorney, judge, probation officer, researcher, current or former inmate, etc. (Note: Military personnel have the option of interviewing an equivalent person in the military.) Should your “expert” not be listed here, contact your instructor.
1) Provide the purpose of the paper and background information on the selected person.
2) Record the person’s views on the criminal justice system—whether the criminal justice system works, in what ways it doesn’t work, and the future of the criminal justice system.
3) Write the paper in a narrative format, detailing what you learned as the result of speaking with this person. Do not submit a “question-answer” paper.
4) Compare and contrast what your expert practitioner had to say with relevant instructional material from this course. Additionally, include one outside source that either supports or challenges what your expert practitioner said.
5) When using the instructional material or other sources, properly document and reference them, and cite all web sources. You must include the name your practitioner.
Criminal Court Visit
Your task is to visit a criminal court session. (Note: Military personnel have the option of visiting the military equivalent.) Depending on when you attend, you could see a series of cases or only one case. Write your reflections on what you observed and how the proceedings seemed to affect the administration of justice.
1) Begin with a cover page with your name, project title, course, and date submitted. 2) Write an introductory section explaining the purpose of the paper. 3) Write your reflections on what you observed and how the proceedings seemed to affect the administration of justice.
4) Compare and contrast what you observed with relevant material. Additionally, include one outside source that either you observed.
5) When using the text or other sources, properly document and reference them. The name of the court you visited must be included.
This is an observational assignment that focuses on the use of discretion by the police officers who patrol our communities. (Note: Military personnel may participate in a ride-along with a military police officer.) Your task is to ride with a police officer for a few hours and observe who is stopped and why. Who is arrested and why? How does the use of discretion play into the patrol officer’s job?
1) Begin with a cover page with your name, project title, course, and date submitted.
2) Write an introductory section that includes the purpose of the paper and information on the assignment of the officer, his or her department, and the date, time, and duration of the ride-along.
3) Using a narrative format, provide the officers views on the use of discretion in his or her job, then follow this with your observations and conclusions based on his or her performance.
4) Use research information from class materials to analyze the information obtained. Additionally, include one outside source that either supports or challenges what your officer said.
5) When using the text or other sources properly document and reference them. The name of your officer must be included.
Correctional Facility Visit
Your task is to visit a correctional facility (adult, juvenile, military) and compare and contrast what you see with what the text indicates.
1) Begin with a cover page with your name, project title, course, and date submitted. 2) Write an introduction that provides the purpose of the paper and information concerning the facility visited.
2) If possible, interview residents, administrators, and correctional officers. How do they view the correctional process? What are the pros and cons of the types of facilities we have in the United States? How has corrections changed over the past ten years?
3) Write the information down in a narrative format.
4) Compare and contrast the information obtained with course material. Additionally, include one outside source that either supports or challenges what you observed.
View of Politics in the United States Distributed: 28th July, 2017 Last Edited: eleventh September, 2017 Disclaimer: This exposition has been put together by an understudy. This isn't a case of the work composed by our expert paper essayists. You can see tests of our expert work here. Any suppositions, discoveries, conclusions or proposals communicated in this material are those of the writers and don't really mirror the perspectives of UK Essays. It is safe to say that you are content with the United States political condition at the present time? Seat Research says that 77% of Americans are most certainly not. Aristotle was an awesome Greek savant and he thought of governmental issues as "The inside for human civil argument and hypothesis". Do the residents of the United States esteem governmental issues similarly Aristotle imagined? As people of the world, governmental issues ought to be a sheltered place where extreme choices are made by the general population. Political issues ought to be talked about in the open, with morals at the bleeding edge. Toward the finish of perusing this, you will comprehend why governmental issues ought to be centered around morals, and the "issues" ought to be moral difficulties that we would all be able to concur should be settled. The cutting edge word 'political' is gotten from the Greek word 'politikos'. The Greeks trusted that legislative issues, religion, and culture were interwoven. Greek'city-states', like Athens and Sparta, architected their foundation after this thought. Making town epicenters where political verbal confrontation could occur as theater, and get-togethers could be held to examine moral issues. Aristotle trusted that governmental issues ought to be utilized as a commonsense science, enhancing for resident's entire lives straightforwardly. Aristotle's thoughts regarding governmental issues shaped the establishment of the present Political Scientists. Political Science is an investigation of the assignments a lawmaker must embrace. Place yourself in the shoes of a political researcher; How hard are the issues that lawmakers are in charge of today? How might you encourage them to take care of those issues? These basic inquiries must be solicited by the nationals from the United States so as to sympathize with legislators, and eventually advance as a nation. To enable myself to comprehend what the present view of governmental issues in America, I solicited individuals from my family two inquiries: 1) What is your impression of legislative issues in the United States? 2) Regardless of that observation, what things would you change about legislative issues in the United States? My side of the family is conservative, republican, and expert trump. My better half's side is left wing, democrat, and genius Obama. The scope of answers I got was wide, yet they generally had a typical subject; "America is doing fine and dandy, however we need reasonable treatment and incorporation for all nationals". How about we begin with the primary inquiry. Right side reactions were generally positive, expressing that the nation is inclining upwards and things really completing by lawmakers. Left side reactions were sure too, expressing that legislature has a decent arrangement of governing rules set up, however that it is being tried. The two sides have a general positive perspective of our nation. I had exception reactions notwithstanding. One relative who distinguishes as a republican expressed their present impression of governmental issues is debasement and narrow mindedness. They might want to see straightforwardness and responsibility for moves made by government authorities. Another relative who recognizes as democrat noticed that their present impression of governmental issues has not changed nearly as long as they can remember, regardless of the president. They pushed for the significance of nearby government and the influence it has on our lives. The reactions to the second inquiry were considerably more distant from each other on the privilege and left. Right side reactions predominantly centered around term limits for all government officials. They need a consistent cycle of legislators so we don't have vocation government officials, thus that we can have an enduring turnover and wide portrayal. Left side reactions fluctuated from each other. One part saying they wouldn't transform anything since we have satisfactory governing rules set up to deal with issues. Another part supporting for subject's proactivity in legislative issues, needing to make it an occasion on race days, and urge individuals to get engaged with nearby government. These reactions to my request are intriguing. Amid their meetings, most relatives expressed that they need the division between our nation settled. It's fascinating that the general subject of their reactions was comparative. Perhaps in the event that we as a whole adopted a strategy like what Aristotle recommends, making governmental issues the focal point of our social lives, we would have the capacity to see each other better, and set aside social contrasts to center around moral issues. Social Issues separate the nation; moral issues join all of us. Morals is characterized as 'moral rules that administer a man's conduct or the leading of a movement'. Political issues normally come in two distinct composes; Ethical, or Social. Social issues are things like: "Would it be advisable for us to give all the more financing to internal city schools?" or "Would boosting different business procures enhance our economy?". Though moral issues are things like: "Do we have to follow up on environmental change?" or "Should ladies be permitted to pick when they get a fetus removal?". The distinction is essentially this: Ethical issues manage what is correct, Social issues manage enhancing a particular piece of society. Is it accurate to say that you are beginning to comprehend why Aristotle says that Ethics ought to be the center of governmental issues? Aristotle needed governmental issues to be utilized for the bliss of man, he says 'The science that reviews the incomparable useful for man, is legislative issues' (Living Ethics, 92). The 'Preeminent Good' is regularly alluded to as morals in the present culture. Aristotle trusted that moral issues ought to be the focal point of legislative issues. I accept on the off chance that we center around morals and consolidate social angles into neighborhood political dialog, the social issues can be tackled by the general population, while moral issues could be understood by the legislature. Moral issues are generally the most wrangled about issues. A few cases of moral issues today are: Poverty, Education, Immigration, Sentencing, Environment, and Climate Change. Both left and right legislative issues have solid perspectives on how these moral situations ought to be dealt with, yet the two sides concur that they are in reality issues that should be tended to. What do you need from government? As a subject of the United States, I need government to take care of moral issues while taking contribution from resident agents. As an individual from society, I might want to see more social effort and inclusion from everybody with the goal that we may meet up to fathom social issues. As people of the world, governmental issues ought to be a protected place where extreme choices are made by the general population. Political issues ought to be talked about in the open, with morals at the front line. Aristotle had faith in this, thus do the residents of the United States today.>GET ANSWER