Some U.S. House districts, such as U.S. House District 7 (Links to an external site.) Links to an external site. , are overwhelmingly Republican. Drawn to include western parts of Houston, the district was represented by George H.W. Bush, who went on to serve as President of the United States, then Bill Archer, who served as chairman of the House Ways and Means Committee. First elected in 2000, Congressman John Culberson (Links to an external site.) Links to an external site. has represented District 7 for the past 15 years. Though widely regarded as one of the most conservative members of Congress, Culberson had to defeat primary opponents who said he wasn’t conservative enough. Meanwhile, to the surprise of many local political observers, Hillary Clinton carried District 7 over Donald Trump in the 2016 presidential election. This fall Congressman Culberson will face a challenge from Democratic nominee Lizzie Fletcher (Links to an external site.)
For this assignment, you’re going to become a campaign manager. Choose one of these two candidates (Culberson or Fletcher) and design a campaign to win this fall’s congressional election. Write this assignment as a 2 – 5 page memo (Links to an external site.). (but with cited sources) from you, the campaign manager, to your candidate. Outline the race for them, how much money you think they need to raise, how you will raise it for them, what you propose to spend it on, what issues they should talk about, how you want to deliver their message, etc. Some things to keep in mind: The 7th District is pretty Republican. I see two possible factors that could make this year different. One is the increasing unpopularity of the always-volatile President Donald Trump, especially in a generally Republican district that voted against him. Another is Hurricane Harvey – which hit the 7th District especially hard. Action by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers flooded hundreds of houses in Culberson’s district, and victims want somebody to blame. Cong. Culberson is an incumbent seeking reelection. Read in your text about the advantages of incumbency. Ms Fletcher is a challenger, but challengers have certain advantages. Culberson has a 17-year record in Congress to criticize. Fletcher doesn’t. Congress, as an institution, isn’t well liked (Links to an external site.) Links to an external site. . The 7th District is pretty conservative. Should Fletcher downplay her liberal views to try to get anti-Trump Republicans to cross over and vote for her, or play to the Democratic base to try to drive up Democratic turnout? Fletcher won the Democratic nomination in a bitter primary election, defeating Bernie Sanders acolyte Laura Moser in a huge disappointment to labor unions and the Democratic Party’s left wing. Not everybody who lives in district will vote in this election. Some are under 18 years old, or they’re not U.S. citizens. Some simply won’t register or show up. How do you target people who are going to vote in this election? What sort of people live in your candidate’s district. What motivates them? What is your candidate’s background and experience? What will be his or her key issues? How much money will you need? How will you raise it? How will you spend it?
Effect of Television: The Kennedy Nixon Debates Disclaimer: This work has been put together by an understudy. This isn't a case of the work composed by our expert scholastic scholars. You can see tests of our expert work here. Any sentiments, discoveries, ends or suggestions communicated in this material are those of the writers and don't really mirror the perspectives of UK Essays. Distributed: Mon, 13 Aug 2018 For what reason were the Kennedy-Nixon banters in 1960 so critical for the political impact of American TV? Presentation The discussions between John Kennedy and Richard Nixon in the most recent long stretches of the 1960 presidential battle have turned out to be both acclaimed (in the American open's creative ability) and compelling (in deciding the idea of consequent political crusades, in America as well as in other western majority rules systems too). These discussions were viewed by in excess of 70 million watchers in America (and millions more tuned in on the radio). In any case, before the beginning of the crusade, it was in no way, shape or form clear that Kennedy would win. Toward the start of 1960, President Eisenhower was as yet a prominent competitor, and would have won had he been permitted by the constitution to remain for a third term. Lyndon Johnson had a regionalised bolster situated in the South, Kennedy appeared to be very youthful and unpracticed, and Vice-President Nixon did not have the certainty of the electorate. These TV discusses (the first occasion when that a presidential discussion had been broadcast) were subsequently vital in winning the race for John Kennedy, and for anchoring the thrashing of Nixon, however the TV (and the picture made from being on TV) had at no other time assumed such an essential job in a race crusade. How did this come to fruition? TV as pivotal to Kennedy's battle Kennedy formalized his revelation for the administration on second January 1960, which some expert lawmakers felt was too soon to start a presidential crusade. Kennedy understood that he had an issue, yet he was constrained both by his very own freshness (he required more opportunity to substantiate himself) and by the antagonistic vibe he looked from senior individuals from the Democrat party. Keeping in mind the end goal to stand any difference in being named, Kennedy expected to make his crusade open and open, and vitally, to utilize TV to make a decent open picture, to pull in people in general, and to energize the voters by introducing himself as the applicant best fit the bill to take America forward into this promising new time, exemplified by expectation and optimism. Kennedy likewise needed to beat a few issues that would have had an enormously adverse effect on his open picture: he experienced endless weakness and he was unbridled, regardless of his noticeable and open marriage to Jacqueline Bouvier in 1953 at a general public wedding in Newport, Rhode Island, before a horde of 3,000. It is remarkable that Kennedy figured out how to keep this part of his own life calm simply because the media gave careful consideration the private existences of those in office, however this was in 1960, and before Kennedy was going to change government officials as TV famous people. Kennedy oversaw both to defeat these spoilers to his picture, and to make a positive picture regardless of others' reactions of his capacity to hold office, by engaging straight to voters, by means of the new broad communications innovation of TV and TV showcasing; this was a redoing of American politics. The medium is the message It is the idea of the medium of TV, with its mix of visual and sound pieces of information, and its moment, mass correspondence, that a considerable number individuals can go to a moment judgment of a hopeful constructed in light of what he says, as well as on how he says it. The principal presidential discussion was critical; each of the three ensuing discussions depended on the Kennedy's underlying TV achievement. It is fascinating to contrast the TV and the radio discussion for a case of how powerful the TV banter was, and for how it would anchor the supremacy of the medium of TV over radio, something which has not yet been changed in the advanced time of political electioneering. Radio audience members evaluated Nixon the victor in these discussions, while watchers at home trusted that Kennedy had won. On the off chance that there was such an unmistakable contrast between perspectives on various media, at that point the reality of the situation must prove that the idea of the media is the clarification. On TV, watchers could see a Kennedy who was sharp looking, good looking and eloquent (as it were, a political superstar) against an ineffectively exhibited and gravely dressed Nixon. Neither one of the candidates had in established truth any awesome contrast between them regarding their political arrangements; Kennedy was simply fantastically fruitful at underlining his dynamism, youth, force and confidence, as such, a triumph of style over political substance. The voter turn-out of the race demonstrates exactly how great Kennedy was at incitement the enthusiasm of the electorate by means of his great picture introduction. The turn-out (as far as level of grown-ups of voting age throwing votes) was the most elevated it had ever been ever of governmental issues, particularly among African American voters, whose vote Kennedy had figured out how to anchor by his prominent relationship with the social liberties movement. President as superstar: the emphasis on picture The TV discusses enormously propelled the prevalent picture of Kennedy. For instance, numerous individuals had imagined that Kennedy was excessively youthful (he was the principal American president to take office conceived in the twentieth century, at age 43) and excessively unpracticed, making it impossible to take office. This would have been a genuine feedback of the eventual president, and truth be told, this was just scattered by his appearance on TV, something that Kennedy himself later conceded: "We wouldn't have had a petition without that gadget". He seemed to be cool, quiet and gathered, with balance and learning enough to persevere through the obligation of holding presidential office. It was these presidential discussions in 1960 that truly pushed Kennedy to control, on the back of the positive open picture he had created. Truth be told, so fruitful was the watchful administration of presidential appearance on TV, that the picture of Kennedy as young, dynamic, hopeful and ready to 'grab the occasion' was never lost after his race to office. Rather, Kennedy proceeded to epitomize the early good faith and anticipation of mid 1960s America (and the picture of Kennedy as wonderful and courageous was built up simply more immovably by his death on 22nd November, 1963). This was a period when incredible social designs and developments could be won (the social liberties development), a period when new wildernesses were being extended and investigated (the space race) and a period when numerous longed for expanded riches and financial prosperity. The exercise learnt Nobody more than fizzled presidential hopeful Nixon knew about how imperative making a positive picture on TV (and radio) was: "Thinking back on every one of them four, [television debates] there can be no doubt yet that Kennedy had increased more from the discussions than I." It is evident that these TV discusses were essential for anchoring discretionary achievement; Nixon neglected to win the presidential battle in 1960, and he ascribed this straightforwardly to the manner in which his picture was overseen (particularly on TV): "I perceived the fundamental oversights I had made. I had focused excessively on substance and insufficient on appearance." Nixon never committed that error again. In 1968, when he again kept running for president, he ensured that his appearances on TV were firmly controlled and planned, to seem cool, quiet, and gathered; at the end of the day, similarly as Kennedy had so effectively showed up in 1960. It worked. Nixon progressed toward becoming president in 1968, however he regularly endeavored to deny that he was one of the principal presidents to understand that picture (most effectively conveyed by means of the broad communications of TV) was essential to discretionary and thereupon political achievement: "I don't stress over surveys. I don't stress over pictures… I never have." This, obviously, was not valid. Nixon consumed a lot of vitality into keeping up a decent open image, something which no president had done to a remarkable degree previously, and something which has likewise set a point of reference for all consequent western political battles: they have scholarly Nixon's 1960 presidential exercise – never disregard the significance of seeming great on TV.>GET ANSWER