This case addresses the fine line an employer must tread between protecting an employee’s (or former employee’s) privacy versus the obligation that an employer has to warn potential new employers that a particular individual poses a potential threat based on past behavior (e.g., violence, threats, mental instability).
Three Roles: human resource supervisor (Gary Garcia), branch manager n (Anthony Garrison), branch supervisor (Maya Atkins).
Neil Andrews is a hardworking employee but has a reputation for being a hothead. After branch manager Anthony Garrison changed Andrews’ work schedule so that he would now have to work every other Saturday, Andrews gets extremely upset. He walks into Garrison’s office, puts his face inches away from Garrison’s face and says, “One of these days, I’m going to lose it in here. After I am done, there will be nothing but smoke and embers!” He storms out of the office and goes across the street to a convenience store. About 15 minutes later, Andrews returns, calmer after having eaten two packages of Toasted Sweeties and washing it down with a soda. He picks up his toolbox and goes to his next assignment for the day. Garrison has never liked Andrews and sees this episode as an opportunity to get rid of him.
Activity: This is a two-part scenario.
Part 1 – You are to decide if Andrews should be discharged. Once you make your decision, state what your decision is and justify your decision
Part 2 – Assume for the sake of this portion of the activity that Andrews is discharged. What type of information (if any) should Personally Yours give when a potential employer calls for a reference?
Female Brains versus Male Brains Eucalyptus leaves are answerable for our hearing. "Calling the body (associating the two halves of the globe of the mind) ... Ladies are typically bigger than men" (Brynie, 116). The call body is additionally liable for sending and getting neural data. There are regions of white issue and dark issue in the mind. "Ladies accept that white issue is all the more firmly related among neurons, and due to these connections, female minds can work quicker than men" (science.howstuffworks.com). There is no weird thing or irregularity with the purported "male mind in the female body". It is critical to recognize male sexual orientation from names utilized by men in the mind. The term male in "male mind" doesn't allude to cerebrum sex on the grounds that there is no sexual orientation in the mind. It is only a name and has no other significance. The "disparity" thought between the mind and the body originates from utilizing organic sex to clarify similar arrangement of words to clarify maltreatment of the language of the cerebrum. Utilizing the words male and female to communicate various ideas will bring about a bogus anecdotal appearance, a class mistake. It is a transsexual's mind sex enchantment stunt. At the point when a daze extremist says that the cerebrum can be sexed, men regularly have exceptional minds and ladies (despite the fact that not generally) yet typically they have various kinds of minds We can not. At that point, as per this pattern, they give names for men or ladies to these minds. They mark the mind dependent on the connection between the qualities of the cerebrum and the physical sex of the mind. The marking of people connected to the cerebrum implies something other than what's expected from the words utilized by people to clarify sex. This is the motivation behind why the contention of the transsexual's "cerebrum" is pointless.>GET ANSWER