In this article, the author Robin K. Hill mentions the ethical problem of software neglect, and it is a very interesting article for anyone who is interested
in entering the world of software!
Here are the initial questions:
Do you agree with Robin’s initial point that lack of code documentation and quality is an issue in software today? Have you ever worked with a piece of code
that had little documentation? If so, how quickly were you able to adapt and effectively use that code?
Do you believe that programmers should be more responsible for the code they release, either closed source to a private company or open source to the
community? Do you believe that releasing code with a lack of quality violates any ethical principles?
Do you believe that Robin’s solution of telling people who use certain code that it may be unreliable is a good solution? Do you have any other ideas on how
the relationship between the developers who use code and the ones who create it can be improved?
Sample Solution
