What are two ethical economic, commercial, social or environmental issues that must
be managed by contemporary organisations?
What are two ethical frameworks that can help inform you about how to best
manage these issues?
- Introduction (75 words)
- Identification of issue 1 (150 words)
- Ethical framework for addressing issue 1 and justification of choice
- Identification of issue 2 (150 words)
- Ethical framework for addressing issue 2 and justification of choice
- Conclusion (75 words)
- Reference list (excluded from word count)
In Part B, you will address the following question:
How does reflecting about the ethical management of these issues inform your
thinking about your future workplace behaviour?
How might you change your behaviour in the future based on what
you have learned about the two ethical frameworks?
How does your professional ethics influence how you might behave?
How might the behaviour of senior management influence your
How might corporate governance structures influence your
How might the culture of the organisation influence your behaviour?
How can ethical codes of conduct be used by organisations to create
an ethical culture in organisations?
Darwinian theory because systems which are entirely working can then only natural selection be present. An example in a living cell is the scheme of how proteins are able to navigate to the precise destination where proteins carry out their “specialized tasks, such as digestion of nutrients and excretion of wastes. This constant, regulated traffic flow in the cell comprises another remarkably complex, irreducible system.” In order for a system to function fittingly, a system should no break down and the system’s parts should not break down. Kenneth R. Miller counters the argument of irreducible complexity; an intricate system cannot be produced by evolution. Kenneth Miller proves his disagreement by explaining the fault he sees in Michael Behe’s own example, the mousetrap. Michael Behe states how removing a part of the mousetrap causes it to stop functioning, but Kenneth Miller states that you may not have a mousetrap taking away certain pats, but you can have another fully functional machine. A mousetrap is composed of a base, a metal hammer, a spring, a catch and a metal bar. “Take away the catch and the metal bar, [there is] a functional paper clip. Take away the spring, and you have a two-part key chain. The point is that bits and pieces of supposedly irreducibly complex machines may have different, but still useful functions.” Kenneth R. Miller argues that Darwinian mechanisms could have arranged the numerous complex system that exists within living things. “Evolution produces complex biochemical machines by copying, modifying, and combining proteins previously used for other functions.” Kenneth Miller uses again one of Michael Behe’s own example. As mentioned before, Michael Behe argues how an intelligent design is behind the complexity of how the proteins move from one “subcellular compartment” to another. The journal called Cell has an article where working researchers noted “these mechanisms suggest in a natural way how the many and diverse compartments in eukaryotic cells could have evolved in the first place.” Overall, intelligent design does not succeed with present any biochemical evidence.>GET ANSWER