You have just started an internship at Workshire Bathaway (or “WB”), a large and very successful conglomerate in New York. You cannot believe your good fortune at working and learning at such a prestigious firm, and in fact have the opportunity to work directly with its President and CEO Ms. Wren Baker.
In order to assess your understanding of financial reporting and financial analysis Ms. Baker has tasked you with identifying a company that WB may want to purchase. Given the almost unlimited resources of WB it does not matter how big the potential target is, what industry it is in, whether it is public or private, where it is located globally, etc.
Seeing the perplexed look on your face, Ms. Baker has provided some more specific instructions below. To make an investment recommendation Ms. Baker asks that you select two similar companies for analysis, use data from public sources, prepare an extensive financial analysis, then communicate the results of your analysis in a detailed written report, and highlight the results in a short presentation. The goal is to provide an investment recommendation to Ms. Baker. Ms. Baker notes that this project will build your critical thinking, software usage, and communication skills.
A written report that includes the following:
A. Company profile: An overview of the companies that includes a description of the business operations, the industry in which they operate, their products, their markets, and competitors. This is very important to provide Ms. Baker with an understanding of the potential business purchase.
B. Company news: summarize at least 1 major event that have affected each company or their industry over the past two years.
C. Financial statement analysis: prepare and analyze condensed, trend and common size financial statements for each company.
D. Ratio analysis: prepare a comprehensive analysis of financial ratios for the companies focused on its profitability, efficiency, liquidity, and solvency. Where applicable compare to industry or competitor information and norms.
E. Research summary: Answer the following question in written form: Which of these two companies do you recommend WB to purchase? Prepare a written summary of your analysis and supported investment recommendation.
Which of these two companies do you recommend WB to purchase? Prepare an audio presentation (5 minutes or less) highlighting information from your written report that supports your investment recommendation.You need to record your presentation (audio only)
Key deliverables and timelines
You must select a pair of two companies for this project. For example, you can choose Pair #2 which includes PRB and PTR. However, it is not allowed to mix and match, i.e. choosing BTI and SNE are not allowed. You are encouraged to research potential companies before identifying company or companies they would like to analyze for this project.
Pair Company A Company B
1 America Movil AMX Vodafone Group VOD
2 Petroleo Brasileiro S.A. PBR PetroChina Co. Limited PTR
3 Sony SNE Koninklijke Philips N.V. PHG
4 Toyota Motor Corp TM Tata Motors TTM
5 British American Tobacco BTI Altria Group, Inc. MO
6 Banco Santander, S.A. SAN PNC Financial Services Group PNC
7 BHP Group BHP Rio Tinto RIO
8 ABB Ltd ABB General Electric Company GE
9 Ball Corp BLL Amcor AMCR
10 Diageo Plc DEO Constellation Brands STZ
11 Union Pacific Corp UNP Canadian National Railway CNI
12 Johnson & Johnson JNJ Novartis AG NVS
13 Capri Holdings CPRI V.F. Corp VFC
You are strongly urged to use spreadsheet software for purposes of the financial statement and ratio analysis (the quantitative items described in C and D above).
Detailed instructions (with suggested length):
A. Company profile (2 pages):
a. Review the corporate website of each company, which often provides general and investor relations information. Recognize that this information may be biased in favour of the company.
b. Review the annual reports (financial statements and management discussion and analysis), interim filings, and prospectuses, material change reports, and information circulars (as available).
Summarize your research in a 1 – 3-page written report on your companies –industry, products, and markets. This should be a professionally written paper with introductory and concluding paragraphs. Appropriately cite all sources.
B. Company news (1 page):
a. For each of your company, identify and summarize at least 1 major event that have affected the company or its industry over the two years. Discuss how this event is expected to impact the company’s operations and financial performance and ratios. Consider factors such as commodity prices, exchange rates, regulatory changes, acquisitions, changes in competitive landscape, changes in government regulation or consumer trends, etc.
b. It is important to not rely entirely on the company to identify these news items. In fact, you are unlikely to find this in any of the company’s reporting.
c. Ensure the items are legitimate ‘news’ – dividend announcements, analysts’ share price expectations, management conference call, company outlook announcements, etc. – these items are not news. Appropriately cite all sources.
C. Financial statement analysis (3 pages of quantitative analysis and 2 pages of written discussion):
a. For each of your company, collect at least three most recent years of financial statements which will provide at least 4 years of financial information.
b. Prepare condensed statements of financial position, statements of income and comprehensive income, and statements of cash flow. Use of spreadsheet software is strongly recommended.
c. Prepare trend analysis and common sized financial statements from the condensed statements.
d. Review the condensed, trend and common sized statement of financial position. For each of your company, comment on trends in the growth of assets, liabilities, shareholders’ equity and overall financial risk. Where available, compare the two companies.
e. Review the condensed, trend and common sized statement of income. For each of your company, comment on trends in revenue, expenses, income, and overall profitability. Where available, compare the two companies.
f. Review the condensed, trend and common sized statement of cash flows. For each of your company, comment on trends in the operating, investing and financing cash flows, and overall cash position. Where available, compare the two companies.
g. Write a summary of the overall financial ‘story’ reflected in the financial statements based on your analysis.
D. Ratio analysis (3 pages of quantitative analysis plus 2-page written report)
a. For each of your company, prepare an extensive multi-year ratio analysis based on the financial statement analysis. Use of spreadsheet software is strongly recommended. Do not use every possible ratio analysis. Rather, identify the ratios that are most important to the company.
b. For each calculated ratio, comment on whether the ratio is stronger or weaker, quicker or slower, more liquid or less liquid, more risks or less risky.
c. Where available, compare the financial ratios of the two companies.
d. Prepare written report discussing:
i. What the ratio analysis reveals about the companies – financial strength, profitability, risk, etc.
ii. The companies’ profitability, efficiency, liquidity, and solvency and noting whether these measures are improving or deteriorating, and the implications for a potential investor. What does this analysis suggest about future performance of the firms?
e. Discuss the impact of accounting rules on your financial ratios if applicable. You are not required to calculate the adjustment from one accounting rule to another. But, you need to discuss what kind of bias the differences in accounting rules may create for your financial ratios, if any.
E. Research summary (2 pages)
a. This written document should summarize your research in a clear and concise manner. b. As part of this document:
i. Indicate whether the overall profitability, efficiency, liquidity, and solvency of the companies are strong, average or weak. Comment on risks associated with the companies. Support your conclusions.
ii. Summarize current events and other items of importance. iii. Make a supported recommendation to Ms. Baker: indicate which of the two companies WB should invest in. Please include three to five significant points to justify your conclusion.
Presentation (audio only, up to 5 minutes): Please put in writing what must be said for the audio presentation on a separate word document
Which of these two companies do you recommend WB to purchase? Prepare an audio presentation that summarizes your research and analysis of the companies. No presentation slides are required. Use your research summary to organize your presentation.
Be convincing – should Ms. Baker invest in company A or company B? Does your research support your recommendation?
Focus on key financial information and ratios.
Focus on highlights of your research, not a broad summary.
Make it interesting, concise, and clear. And naturally Ms. Baker expects it to be professional.
Term Project Submission:
Your submission should include two files: a PDF file and an audio file. Prepare your PDF file with the following sections, in the order indicated:
- Title page
- Research summary (part E)
- Tell me about the company (part A)
- Company news (part B)
- Financial statement analysis (part C)
- Ratio analysis (part D)
- Appendices (spreadsheet tables):
a. Financial statement analysis: condensed and common sized financial statements b. Ratio analysis
Section Weights (%)
A. Research summary 10
B. Tell me about the company 10
C. Financial statement analysis and discussion 25
D. Ratio analysis and discussion 25
Professional quality – coverage, presentation, grammar 3
The reason for this paper is to look at basically the fundamentals of initiative, with a specific spotlight on the things that cause a person to develop as a casual pioneer in the work environment. There are a few undertakings that are best overseen by colleagues who are gifted and have a ton of mastery. The paper begins with a presentation that depicts the conventional and current ways to deal with authority and the qualities of the speculations that examine initiative. The presentation is trailed by a portrayal of the situation of emanant administration. The situation clarifies the contrasts among doled out and emanant initiatives, and the benefits of the last mentioned. The following area clarifies how rising pioneers can apply various styles to suit various circumstances, and portrays the abilities of pioneers and how they use them to develop as compelling pioneers. The segment is trailed by the application and investigation area that portrayed the qualities of pioneers and how they use them successfully. The article closes with an end that clarifies how individuals from a group can respect the abilities and qualities of others so as to improve their administration aptitudes. Presentation Administration is fundamental for driving an association or a group towards accomplishing a shared objective just as individual objectives. A decent pioneer has the right stuff to persuade colleagues so they may achieve an undertaking rapidly and successfully. A powerful pioneer can keep the colleagues focusing on accomplishment and the individuals stay future arranged, are all the more persevering, and delay satisfactions (Felfe and Schyns, 2014). A sober minded pioneer comprehends the qualities and abilities of devotees and how they associate and their disparities. A viable pioneer builds up a reasonable vision of what they focus on and discusses the vision with the individuals that they plan to lead. Such a pioneer remembers that a dream without an arrangement is essentially a fantasy and an arrangement without a dream is drudgery. All the more explicitly, this paper looks to analyze fundamentally the basics of initiative, with a specific spotlight on the things that cause a person to rise as a casual pioneer in the working environment. The Essence of Leadership Administration is an all encompassing range with respect to the capacity of an individual to control others in a group or an association. It tends to be seen as a social impact process in which the individual enrolls the assistance of others to accomplish an objective or achieve a specific assignment. As indicated by Dries and Pepermans (2012), the range is gotten from unrivaled mental energies, predominant strategies for task the executives, better capacity than control others, higher forces to inspire others, and prevalent intelligence and worth levels (Dries and Pepermans, 2012). Every one of these wellsprings of initiative makes a pioneer inside a specific degree. The speculations that are applied to explore administration spin around insight, attributes, conduct, situational connection, vision, capacity, and charm. All the more critically, a pioneer is said to be blessed with social powers that are respected by others so much that they copy the pioneer (Luria and Berson, 2013). The pioneer is credited for the prevalence of abilities, acclaim, information, or data that they have in their specialized topic. Situation In organizations that depend intensely on development, in particular, tech organizations, authority rise up out of any colleague with the capacity to lead. Murphy and Johnson (2011) include that as the business develops, business people feel the requirement for having pioneers with boundless opportunity of pushing the association ahead (Murphy and Johnson, 2011). The pioneers generally emerge from the group of representatives and are known as rising pioneers. In contrast to the alloted pioneers, emanant pioneers are not really procured legitimately into authority positions. Relegated pioneers get their power from their situations in the organization pecking order. The titles they are given, convey weight with the workers they lead and they anticipate that representatives should show regard for their position (Emery, 2012). Basically, the organization requests that the doled out pioneer ought to show the capacity to persuade others, more significant level of critical thinking and more prominent intelligence to legitimize the task. A developing head has countless engaging character qualities. In any case, a rising head takes errands intentionally, empowers agreements among laborers, helps associates to finish their undertakings, and contemplates the destinations of the organization. Basically, this sort of authority comes some time before the individual is formally recognized as a pioneer. Further, Carson, Tesluk and Marrone (2010) attest that such a pioneer gathers regard from associates and is seen as a creative worker since they buckle down (Carson, Tesluk and Marrone, 2010). Besides, they will in general be compassionate and reasonable when managing individual representatives since they are not constrained to exhibit their capacity to lead. Interestingly, it is normal for representatives to see that alloted pioneers as savvy, astute, and taught, regardless of whether they are most certainly not. Generally speaking, rising pioneers are increasingly viable when contrasted with doled out pioneers. At the point when an organization grasps new administration, it urges representatives to function as a group; along these lines, there is free collaboration among seniors and youngsters in various manners. As indicated by Emery (2012), an association utilizes a cross useful administration that permits an open correspondence, so all individuals from an association may happen in accomplishing the goals of the organization (Emery, 2012). Under emanant administration, the association stays away from bureaucratic and direct frameworks of authority since they repress receptiveness. Murphy et al. (2011) guarantee that free correspondence that is normal for emanant administration in the cross-practical administration, urges all individuals to partake in accomplishing hierarchical targets (Murphy and Johnson, 2011). All the more significantly, without open correspondence among partners, there could be a higher likelihood of misguidance and hindered improvement in a work environment. At the point when an association receives rising administration, it enables laborers to set their very own objectives, with the goal that they don't feel compelled when the organization defines the objective for them. The utilization of rising pioneers improves employeesâ€™ love for the association, due to the compensation and rewards, yet in addition in light of the sort of authority (Cã'tã© et al., 2010). Conversely, the allocated chiefs in the associations chip in as facilitators of strengthening with respect to laborers. They are selected to direct the employeesâ€™ obligations. Further, they make adjustments and offer proposal as representatives take a shot at their undertakings, utilizing measurements that they set to assess their own exhibition. Directors are allocated to handle the difficulties that the workers experience as they seek after their objectives. Such an administration depends on the rule that workers ought to be offered opportunity to act; along these lines, they could turn into their very own pioneers, and improve better methods for achieving objectives (Murphy and Johnson, 2011). The developing heads among the representatives help partners to set and change metric and parameters of their undertakings. In view of this, the workers feel urged to impart their inventive plans to associates, so they might be assessed and molded as per hierarchical needs. Hypothetical structure Rising pioneers could lead individuals successfully in the event that they grasp the distinction among administration and the executives. Basically, the executives is the part of doing things right while administration is the part of doing right things. A pioneer and an administrator assume various jobs, despite the fact that individuals will in general utilize the two terms conversely. For example, an administrator encourages the accomplishment of colleagues (Mumford, Watts and Partlow, 2015). Further, a director guarantees that individuals have whatever they require for progress. All the more critically, they encourage the accomplishment of the group by giving what individuals should be beneficial. They are typically all around prepared and have insignificant obstacles in their line of obligation. They are typically being prepped for the following level in the progression of the executives (Cã'tã© et al., 2010). Be that as it may, a rising chief is anybody in the group who has an ability, is innovative, has extraordinary thoughts, and has incredible involvement with a part of the business that can be valuable to the group (Felfe and Schyns, 2014). To be sure, their exercises depend on qualities, not on titles. The pioneer manages changes, challenges, and barely realizes what comes straightaway. A developing head doesn't have every one of the appropriate responses and can't manage colleagues with an iron clench hand in light of the fact that the assignment being completed could be a progression of chances just as snags that come at rapid, and the pioneer requires the interest of aggregate personalities and hearts to overcome. The job rising administration plays in an association features the reasons why top-down initiative is never compelling in a quick paced business condition. Basically, incredible pioneers rouse colleagues to become pioneers, as opposed to making supporters. They share their administration; along these lines, all individuals from the group invest wholeheartedly in their initiative style, and all look increasingly deft, more intelligent, and progressively equipped for executing long running assignments with unexpected and obscure difficulties. Not exclusively do the best colleagues enable various pioneers to reliably develop dependent on their qualities, however they likewise understand that authority can and ought to be situational, contingent upon the necessities of the group (Harms, Roberts and Wood, 2010). In certain examples, colleagues need an individual to show them the way, new instructing style, or a visionary. Hence, a developing head picks their style of authority like a golf player picks the club to use, with a determined examination of the current issue, the objective, and the best device for the assignment. Such pioneers can distil messages, anyway complex th>GET ANSWER