Scenario
As the team leader, your boss wants to ensure you are comfortable dealing with conflict and the resulting negotiations within your team. For each of the five approaches to negotiation, provide a scenario demonstrating the use of that approach.InstructionsFor each approach to negotiation, provide a scenario. Each scenario should include:
The conflict
A description of the chosen approach
The resolution outcome
There will be a total of five scenarios, and each scenario should be at least one paragraph.
Five Approaches to Negotiations
1 Competition or domination of the other side (I win; you lose).
2 Avoidance (You and I both lose).
3 Accommodating or obliging the other (I lose; you win).
4 Collaboration or integration (You win; I win).
5 Compromise (We both win some and lose some).
Sample solution
Dante Alighieri played a critical role in the literature world through his poem Divine Comedy that was written in the 14th century. The poem contains Inferno, Purgatorio, and Paradiso. The Inferno is a description of the nine circles of torment that are found on the earth. It depicts the realms of the people that have gone against the spiritual values and who, instead, have chosen bestial appetite, violence, or fraud and malice. The nine circles of hell are limbo, lust, gluttony, greed and wrath. Others are heresy, violence, fraud, and treachery. The purpose of this paper is to examine the Dante’s Inferno in the perspective of its portrayal of God’s image and the justification of hell.
In this epic poem, God is portrayed as a super being guilty of multiple weaknesses including being egotistic, unjust, and hypocritical. Dante, in this poem, depicts God as being more human than divine by challenging God’s omnipotence. Additionally, the manner in which Dante describes Hell is in full contradiction to the morals of God as written in the Bible. When god arranges Hell to flatter Himself, He commits egotism, a sin that is common among human beings (Cheney, 2016). The weakness is depicted in Limbo and on the Gate of Hell where, for instance, God sends those who do not worship Him to Hell. This implies that failure to worship Him is a sin.
God is also depicted as lacking justice in His actions thus removing the godly image. The injustice is portrayed by the manner in which the sodomites and opportunists are treated. The opportunists are subjected to banner chasing in their lives after death followed by being stung by insects and maggots. They are known to having done neither good nor bad during their lifetimes and, therefore, justice could have demanded that they be granted a neutral punishment having lived a neutral life. The sodomites are also punished unfairly by God when Brunetto Lattini is condemned to hell despite being a good leader (Babor, T. F., McGovern, T., & Robaina, K. (2017). While he commited sodomy, God chooses to ignore all the other good deeds that Brunetto did.
Finally, God is also portrayed as being hypocritical in His actions, a sin that further diminishes His godliness and makes Him more human. A case in point is when God condemns the sin of egotism and goes ahead to commit it repeatedly. Proverbs 29:23 states that “arrogance will bring your downfall, but if you are humble, you will be respected.” When Slattery condemns Dante’s human state as being weak, doubtful, and limited, he is proving God’s hypocrisy because He is also human (Verdicchio, 2015). The actions of God in Hell as portrayed by Dante are inconsistent with the Biblical literature. Both Dante and God are prone to making mistakes, something common among human beings thus making God more human.
To wrap it up, Dante portrays God is more human since He commits the same sins that humans commit: egotism, hypocrisy, and injustice. Hell is justified as being a destination for victims of the mistakes committed by God. The Hell is presented as being a totally different place as compared to what is written about it in the Bible. As a result, reading through the text gives an image of God who is prone to the very mistakes common to humans thus ripping Him off His lofty status of divine and, instead, making Him a mere human. Whether or not Dante did it intentionally is subject to debate but one thing is clear in the poem: the misconstrued notion of God is revealed to future generations.
References
Babor, T. F., McGovern, T., & Robaina, K. (2017). Dante’s inferno: Seven deadly sins in scientific publishing and how to avoid them. Addiction Science: A Guide for the Perplexed, 267.
Cheney, L. D. G. (2016). Illustrations for Dante’s Inferno: A Comparative Study of Sandro Botticelli, Giovanni Stradano, and Federico Zuccaro. Cultural and Religious Studies, 4(8), 487.
Verdicchio, M. (2015). Irony and Desire in Dante’s” Inferno” 27. Italica, 285-297.
Here are five scenarios illustrating each of the five approaches to negotiation, including the conflict, the chosen approach, and the resolution outcome.
1. Competition or Domination of the Other Side (I Win; You Lose)
Conflict: A project team is tasked with developing a new marketing strategy, and two team members have opposing ideas regarding the direction to take. Team Member A believes in a digital-first approach, while Team Member B advocates for traditional marketing methods.
Approach: Team Member A decides to employ a competitive negotiation strategy. During a heated discussion, they assert their viewpoint aggressively, presenting data that favors their digital marketing plan while dismissing Team Member B’s arguments as outdated and ineffective.
Resolution Outcome: Ultimately, Team Member A’s competitive approach leads to their plan being adopted for the marketing strategy. However, this creates resentment within the team, as Team Member B feels their contributions were undervalued and ignored, leading to a lack of collaboration in future projects.
2. Avoidance (You and I Both Lose)
Conflict: Two departments within a company are at odds over resource allocation for an upcoming project. Department A needs additional staff, while Department B believes they should retain those resources for their ongoing initiatives.
Approach: The team leader decides to avoid the conflict altogether, believing it will resolve itself without intervention. They neglect to schedule a meeting or facilitate a conversation between the departments, assuming that each department will find a way to manage.
Resolution Outcome: As a result of this avoidance, neither department gets their needs met, leading to frustration on both sides. The project suffers due to under-resourced teams, and morale decreases as employees feel unsupported in their efforts. The unresolved conflict festers, creating long-term issues between departments.
3. Accommodating or Obliging the Other (I Lose; You Win)
Conflict: A team is working on a client proposal and has a tight deadline. Team Member C has a strong preference for a specific design style that they believe aligns with the client’s brand, while Team Member D wants to incorporate a different style that features more creative risks.
Approach: Team Member C chooses to accommodate Team Member D’s preferences in order to maintain harmony within the team and meet the deadline. They agree to use D’s style despite their reservations, believing that collaboration is more important than their own vision.
Resolution Outcome: The proposal is submitted with Team Member D’s design. The client appreciates the creativity, and ultimately the proposal is accepted. While Team Member D feels validated, Team Member C feels disappointed that their perspective was not included, leading to lingering resentment about their lack of input in the decision-making process.
4. Collaboration or Integration (You Win; I Win)
Conflict: A technology team is divided over how to implement a new software solution. One group insists on using an established platform they are familiar with, while another group argues for exploring innovative solutions that could enhance functionality.
Approach: The team leader facilitates a collaborative negotiation process where all parties are encouraged to voice their ideas and concerns. They organize a brainstorming session aimed at integrating the best features from both proposed solutions.
Resolution Outcome: Through collaboration, the team develops a hybrid solution that incorporates familiar elements from the established platform along with innovative features from the new software. This approach not only satisfies both sides but also results in a more robust final product that enhances overall functionality. The collaborative effort fosters camaraderie and trust among team members.
5. Compromise (We Both Win Some and Lose Some)
Conflict: Two team members, E and F, are working on a product launch schedule. Team Member E wants an earlier launch date due to market demand, while Team Member F believes that additional testing is necessary and pushes for a later launch date.
Approach: To resolve their disagreement, both members agree to negotiate a compromise. They discuss their priorities and constraints openly, acknowledging each other’s perspectives while seeking middle ground.
Resolution Outcome: They ultimately agree on a launch date that is slightly earlier than F originally desired but allows for sufficient testing time. This compromise satisfies both parties to some extent—E gets an earlier launch while F ensures quality assurance. The resolution promotes teamwork and reinforces the importance of balancing different priorities within the group.
These scenarios illustrate how different negotiation approaches can affect conflict resolution within teams. Each method has its own implications for team dynamics and outcomes, highlighting the importance of choosing the right approach based on context and relationships involved.
