Present a total of three representative artifacts for the categorical topic you signed up for.
Your project presentation will include:
1. a short summary of the foundational knowledge about the topic;
Example: if your categorical topic is food, you will discuss the general overview of food associated with samurai-era Japan. You may have your own focus of discussion, but the primary goal of this summary is to inform your classmates the big context of your chosen topic.
2. three or more multiple-choice questions to test your classmates’ comprehension of the foundational knowledge after viewing your presentation, and;
3. A short paragraph each to justify your artifact selection: how the selected artifacts demonstrate important themes (values, mindset, spirit or attitudes) of the Japanese culture.
This week, we will have a small simulation to perform #1 and #3 on one cultural artifact of the United States. You will briefly explain a notable characteristic of the United States, based on some culturally meaningful object or practice. Consider it as a virtual show-and-tell of the American Psyche/Mindset/Ethos/Spirit to foreign audience who know little about America. You will be showing a concrete object/practice to discuss an abstract idea about “Americanness”.
Note: If you are an international student and are not very familiar with American culture, you may select to discuss the culture of the country you came from.
Your company sent you overseas on business. You meet Japanese business associates there.
You go to Japan on an exchange program and meet Japanese people who want to know about America.
You become friends with International students on campus.
You are hosting an exchange student at your home or a new immigrant at your church.
My topic is food at home , and i’m a Chinese student, so please stand by my situation and select to discuss the culture of Chinese, thank you!
(Do not copy directly from sources)
This appraisal ought to be composed and organized as a business report. Select one of the accompanying Operations Management themes (please note that you may likewise choose a sub-point inside every one of the primary subjects): • Lean activities • Quality administration You are relied upon to set up a report based on the accompanying goals. 1. A concise portrayal and diagram of the point chose. This segment may incorporate illustrations, contextual analyses or vignettes from genuine life tasks that are sourced from both the scholarly (e.g. diary papers, original copies) and non-scholastic (e.g. financial analyst, business week and so forth) writings. 2. An investigation of the theme with respect to their commitment to the execution of activities. For instance, what is the connection between lean tasks what's more, firm execution? Specifically, I hope to see a blend of observational confirmation that is accessible in the current scholarly and specialist writing. It would be ideal if you take note of that this proof can be either quantitative or subjective (I don't have an inclination as long as the confirmation is strong). 3. Solid examination will likewise incorporate logical variables. For instance, the effect of TQM programs on execution might be for the most part positive but at the same time is appeared to change agreeing to level of authoritative control (Douglas and Judge, 2001), and firm size (Hendricks and Singhal, 2001 - see full references in the Modules area - Composed Assessment). Your work could show prove for this and a talk of the purposes behind the possibility impact. 4. A rundown and conclusion in light of your discoveries. Sources: Your investigation will be founded on foundation perusing and you ought to give references from scholarly and in addition professional articles to legitimize your presumptions and articulations. Your perusing could incorporate yet not really restricted to the accompanying proposed Diaries: 1. Diary of Operations Management 2. Global Journal of Operations and Production Management 3. Diary of Supply Chain Management 4. Creation and Operations Management 5. Sloan Management Review 6. Harvard Business Review 7. Universal Journal of Production Research FAQs: 1) How would I structure my report? I recommend the accompanying structure: 1. Presentation 2. Subject: portrayal, examination, and conceivably logical variables 3. Conclusions 2) How would I recognize the variables in charge of execution? You ought to counsel the scholarly writing to comprehend the components basic each of the point territories. A decent place to begin is a meta-examination, for instance: Mackelprang, A. W., and Nair, A. (2010). Connection between in the nick of time fabricating practices and execution: A meta-systematic examination. Diary of Tasks Management, 28(4), 283-302. From here you can begin to comprehend the immediate impact of each factor on the different measurements of tasks execution (e.g. cost, quality, conveyance, adaptability) as well as association execution (e.g. money related execution). 3) How much confirmation is required? Ordinarily, the more proof the better, in any case, I would expect at least 10 scholastic references to be utilized for the chosen theme. Report Specifications Your report ought to be of 2000 words (±10%). As far as possible allude to the principle body of content and rejects informative supplements, tables, references and official synopsis (on the off chance that you choose you require one). If you don't mind utilize the APA referencing framework. Points of interest: The writing audit in an exposition serves to light up the examination hole and in this way legitimize the need of the investigation and the proposed ponder system. Despite the fact that this reason stays reliable over all approachs, the structure of the writing audit area of a subjective exposition regularly varies somewhat from that of a quantitative paper. For instance, writing audits in quantitative expositions are predominantly developed around the factors while those in subjective theses can be built from multiple points of view. In this task, you will differentiate the structures of a subjective and a quantitative writing audit and think about a basis for those distinctions. General Requirements: Utilize the accompanying data to guarantee effective finish of the task: Survey the Vangilder (subjective) paper. Survey the Wigton (quantitative) paper. This task utilizes a rubric. It would be ideal if you survey the rubric preceding starting the task to get comfortable with the desires for effective culmination. APA style is required for this task. You are required to present this task to Turnitin. Bearings: Compose a paper (500-750 words) in which you differentiate the structures of the subjective and quantitative papers referenced above and give a method of reasoning for the distinctions. Incorporate the accompanying in your paper: 1. A reasonable depiction of the essential contrasts between the structures of the writing audits. 2. A justification for the watched contrasts. What factors added to the distinctions the structures of these writing audits? RES-845-RS-WigtonQuantDissertation.pdf RES-845-RS-VangilderQualDissertation.pdf>GET ANSWER