• Prepare a 12–15-slide PowerPoint presentation that analyzes the characteristics and responsibilities of global leaders, analyzes the importance of cultural intelligence in effective leadership, and analyzes strategies for ongoing professional leadership development.
Questions to Consider
As you prepare to complete this assessment, you may want to think about other related issues to deepen your understanding or broaden your viewpoint. You are encouraged to consider the questions below and discuss them with a fellow learner, a work associate, an interested friend, or a member of your professional community. Note that these questions are for your own development and exploration and do not need to be completed or submitted as part of your assessment.
• How can you use this course to advance your career?
• What types of leadership development are you currently involved in?
• Toggle Drawer
imagine that you have been recruited for a mid-level leadership position within a global organization. You have been through three rounds of intense interviews and have been invited back to make a last presentation to senior executive leadership. You have been directed to present your plan for ongoing leadership development. You must prepare a PowerPoint presentation and be prepared to talk about it for approximately 15–20 minutes.
Please complete the Global Leadership Inventory linked in the Required Resources section of this assessment.
Create a PowerPoint presentation of 12–15 slides that clearly demonstrate your knowledge of the traits and characteristics of effective global leaders, and which outlines your plan for ongoing leadership development. Please use the speaker notes area of each slide to expand on your talking points.
Customer investigate is a sort of connected humanism that endeavors to outline comprehend the manner by which buyers act and settle on choices about the items that they buy. This is totally central to those overseeing promoting forms for an association. Seeing how shoppers settle on the choice to buy a specific thing of merchandise or administration is crucial to the setting out of advertising gets ready for items. The examination will likewise find which promoting approaches are the best and, along these lines, which ones ought to be rehashed to draw in attention. Commonly, this sort of research is factual in nature, pulling together the greater part of the choice data sources that purchasers will take a gander at, before making decisions. For instance, factors, for example, accessibility, cost, likely esteem development and usefulness will all assume an imperative part regarding purchaser basic leadership. Conventional purchaser inquire about means to be altogether objective in nature and is embraced in an unbiased way, endeavoring to shape a comprehension of the real situation in the given item advertise. Notwithstanding, more as of late, there has been acknowledgment that numerous shoppers will essentially make drive buys and that one particular arrangement of sources of info won't generally create a similar outcome, as human recognitions and basic leadership forms change impressively from individual to individual, contingent upon a scope of elements that can't be perfectly set into a logical analysis. Basically, there are two key ways to deal with shopper investigate which are perceived and examined in the exploration paper by Isabelle Szmigin and Gordon Foxall. Generally, shopper inquire about scholars have contended that buyer look into must normally either fixate on the interpretive approach or the positivist approach. Szmigin and Foxall contended that a blend of the two methodologies will create the best approach. Fundamentally, Szmigin and Foxall perceive that the genuine incentive in shopper inquire about originates from the nature of the data that the exploration provides for the supervisors settling on the continuous advertising choices. This has ostensibly been a greatly neglected factor in shopper look into. A definitive objective for buyer research ought to doubtlessly be to give a complete strategy for an advertising office to follow with a specific end goal to pick up the greatest conceivable customer infiltration. By belligerence this point, Szmigin and Foxall effectively show that the perfect type of customer investigate must assess both logical, target basic leadership factors and additionally the subjective and enthusiastic basic leadership factors, in the event that it is to pick up a nitty gritty and comprehensive comprehension of shopper behaviour. There are seemingly natural positives and negatives to both methodologies and these are examined by Szmigin and Foxall, with fluctuating degrees of conviction. At last, in any case, the creators neglected to achieve a last conclusion as to which technique offered the better approach and rather selected to infer that a center ground would be the best approach. In this paper, the inquiry regarding whether this decision is a genuine impression of the position or whether the creators essentially neglected to discover indisputable confirmation and were accordingly compelled to achieve this conclusion because of the nonattendance of any persuading recommendations despite what might be expected is evident. Interpretive v Positivism The two diverse methodologies under discourse are interpretative and positivistic, in spite of the fact that it could likewise be viewed as a civil argument amongst science and art. Thus, positivistic purchaser examine is all the more normally alluded to as quantitative research and interpretative research is alluded to as subjective research. This is an immediate impression of the measurable significance of the positivistic approach. With the positivist approach, a huge gathering of people is considered with an endeavor to draw one indisputable arrangement of measurements that clarify all customer conduct. The spotlight is especially on the four Ps, specifically item, value, place or area and advancement. In the positivist approach, the reason for the examination is that the four Ps will be the basic factors that will settle on up the basic leadership process for purchasers. These are for the most part target factors and take practically no record of managing individual inclinations as showed by singular shoppers. Amid this procedure, a theory is drawn up which basically sets out the cases which the examination points either to demonstrate or negate. This positivist approach is intensely measurably based and the scrutinizing of buyers will point towards picking up figure based outcomes that can be shown as diagrams. So also, the unwavering quality of the discoveries is tried by factual strategies including learning the importance level of the information. While this strategy is viewed as being conceivably definitive and giving factual information that can be utilized as a part of showcasing systems, it on a very basic level misses the way that people act in various ways notwithstanding when looked with a similar crude information. Distinctive shoppers will settle on various choices and will put diverse relative qualities on the information factors definite above. Interpretative research means to consider this factor. Research is focussed on a littler gathering of people with the point of mapping out purchaser conduct in light of a scope of more subjective factors, for example, those identifying with social and sociological impacts. With this approach, be that as it may, the identity and subjective convictions of the analyst are significantly more prone to affect the consequences of the examination. Identities and subjective considerations will normally shift contingent upon the shopper's qualities and, in light of this, there is a genuine inquiry concerning what esteem this kind of research can offer to advertising experts inside an organization. With no factual examples of conduct, it can be exceptionally troublesome for advertising experts to decide an arrangement of patterns that can be precisely depended upon. Interpretative Approach Analysis Based on Szmigin and Foxall's Research Szmigin and Foxall spent a lot of their examination considering whether the interpretative esteem has any legitimacy and what it can offer as far as extra esteem that this strategy offers the procedure of shopper inquire about. Szmigin and Foxall perceived that papers identifying with interpretative research are frequently observed as fringe to positivistic research, offering little in the method for included esteem. This is, be that as it may, appropriately disposed of by the creators. The paper clarifies the ideas that have been created encompassing the utilization of interpretative research. A standout amongst the most developmental of these ideas is that shown by Thompson, that interpretative research will think of numerous conceivable perspectives as opposed to one individual 'method for the world', which was unmistakable from the positivistic approach. One of the essential issues controlled by Szmigin and Foxall was that the interpretative approach precisely spoke to the complexities of human instinct and that inability to consider this was a deadly imperfection in the customary positivistic approach. Strangely, the approach taken by Szmigin and Foxall, from one perspective, perceived the totally fundamental components that the interpretative approach convey to the wonder that is basic for the total comprehension of shopper conduct, yet in addition offers confidence to the manner by which this approach is excessively esteem loaded and along these lines not by any means solid as a wellspring of data for showcasing experts. The shortcoming of permitting subjective and inside conditions of the shoppers to be considered is broadly acknowledged by Szmigin and Foxall, yet regardless of this, there is a refusal to discount this approach, entirely. One conceivable method for accommodating these restricting musings is that of considering the interpretative research strategies as a method for learning a scope of a few conceivable reasons for activity in view of the scope of potential shopper thought designs from which positivistic research methodologies can be utilized to limit the information into a more valuable arrangement of conclusions. It is this mix of the two methodologies that Szmigin and Foxall center around in achieving their decision. The approach, on its substance, has all the earmarks of being altogether sensible given the information accessible. A Further Look at Interpretative Research Before just tolerating the suggestion that the interpretative research approach offers extra supporting data to the more conventional approach, a more noteworthy investigation of the potential included esteem that can be acquired using interpretative research is required. Klein and Myers contended that interpretative research is just a route by which learning is acquired through customer examine. Instead of seeing interpretative research as an unmistakable strategy for leading shopper inquire about, it might be seen as a method for separating the data assembled through an arrangement of social and social parameters. Interpretative research does not include the pre-setting of parameters or some other factors; rather, it gives the social setting a chance to impact the marvel. It appears that the approach of brushing the two hypotheses is capable, however not in the way that Szmigin and Foxall recognized. A paper by Bruce Rowlands likewise investigated the issue of the relative utilization of interpretative and positivistic methodologies. In any case, for this situation, it was inferred that the mix of the two methodologies would be important however not just on the grounds that no indisputable conclusion identifying with the decision of one over the other could be come to, but instead because of the way that consolidating the two methodologies can accomplish the best of the two universes, in specific conditions. For this situation, it was held that the two methodologies functioned admirably together where the non compelled interpretative approach can be utilized inside no less than a specific arrangement of limits (but freely defined). Basically, this paper perceived>GET ANSWER