In a 5- to 10-slide PowerPoint presentation, address the following:
Provide an overview of the article you selected, including answers to the following questions:
What type of group was discussed?
Who were the participants in the group? Why were they selected?
What was the setting of the group?
How often did the group meet?
What was the duration of the group therapy?
What curative factors might be important for this group and why?
What “exclusion criteria” did the authors mention?
Explain the findings/outcomes of the study in the article. Include whether this will translate into practice with your own client groups. If so, how? If not, why?
Explain whether the limitations of the study might impact your ability to use the findings/outcomes presented in the article.
Allias claims that Kant, by proving how metaphysics can be possible, has also shown how human freedom is possible, in particular, metaphysical human freedom. This is because ‘Kant thinks that the way we think about ourselves as moral agents, and our recognition of moral reasons, requires that we have freedom in a strong sense.’ This is revolutionary in terms of philosophical thought, as it is a move away from the cause-effect thinking of empiricism. Freedom is not compatible with the thought process that everything in space and time happens due to a cause and effect of previous states of the universe and ultimately in line with the laws of nature. Kant thinks that this previous way of thinking threatens human freedom. However, Kant does acknowledge that to have knowledge of causal capacity of the world, and in any capacity, is transcendent, and ultimately beyond our realms of experience. But, in saying this, Kant thinks that through metaphysics, and the metaphysics we have to make sense of science, human freedom cannot be completely ruled out. In this way, since it cannot be proved to not be the case, and since humans have such a strong sense of moral freedom, it is a strong enough argument to believe that we do have moral freedom, according to Kant. In conclusion, the significance of the synthetic a priori judgment is that, whilst proving that metaphysics is possible, it also lays out the limits to what the human mind can know. Metaphysics cannot give us ‘the knowledge of mind-independent reality,’ but instead can only give us ‘a limiting structure of human cognition’. This is significant to the world of philosophy, as Kant claims that now we know the limit to our knowledge, we can stop>GET ANSWER