Take COVID-19 as a disaster. Give examples of COVID19-related direct financial costs, long-term economic costs, environmental costs, AND societal costs. Also, how are these different losses interconnected? How COVID-19 could create economic costs that in turn created an environmental loss? Do you think there will be a difference between rich and poor countries recovering from the pandemic?
Again, take COVID-19 as an example. Back in September 2019, you were offered Anthony Fauci’s job because he resigned. He mentioned something about nobody listening to him and taking him seriously. Rumor says that he slammed the door on his way out and yelled furiously ” I’m too old for this s.”. Fauci left on his desk a file that was pointing to a pandemic developing in the next months. The White House has given you the chance to brief the President. You gave a very persuasive presentation and somehow convinced everyone about the importance of developing a plan to tackle, as much as possible, the pandemic. However, they only give you ONE potential strategy/action/measure for EACH of the following categories: preparedness, response, recovery, mitigation, and prevention. Discuss why you believe these strategies/actions/measures you chose are essential (please, leave political opinions aside).
Cerebrum Transplant Cerebrum transplantation clinical innovation appears to have sufficiently grown to empower specialists to perform mind relocate. Up until now, this system has been effectively finished uniquely for creatures, and now specialists need to do this for people. I don't think cerebrum transfers ought to be attempted, particularly if human transfers ought not be done because of numerous issues and symptoms. Mind transplantation should be possible well in creatures, however that doesn't mean it will succeed people. Since British thinker David Wiggins relocated the two sides of the equator of the mind into two distinct bodies, instances of cerebrum transplantation have been broadly bantered since the 1970s. Here we expect that the two individuals after transfer are mentally adhering to the individual who existed previously. Since they are unique in relation to one another, neither can be equivalent to the first one. Be that as it may, they don't appear to have the capacity to make the first individual equivalent to him, not with others. Since this "split" case appears to establish a case of mental progression without individual character, they are viewed as a test to a mental perspective. A considerable lot of current individual character brain research accept individuals are material. As of now referenced, the case of Rock 's soul movement has been supplanted by a case of mind transplantation in the twentieth century. The thought is that beneficiaries of mind transplantation can be relied upon to have mental records identified with the contributor's previous existence and memory identified with the mental record of the giver before transplantation. The beneficiary will think he is a benefactor - and as indicated by the mental perspective, others should think so. Notwithstanding the chance of pulling in cerebrum unites, a few scholars likewise imagine "distant transmission" gadgets that move individuals by sending data about their neural state starting with one spot then onto the next.>GET ANSWER