Conduct a homeland security assessment on your hometown : Charleston.SC
• Identify homeland security (emergency management) stakeholders who are involved in emergency management.
• What potential hazards (natural, human, technological and HazMat) exist?
• Conduct research to identify hazards and ways to mitigate these hazards (recommended sites are FEMA, IAEM, NEMA, Department of Homeland Security. and State and Local Government sites such as your states Office of Emergency Management. In Virginia it would be the Virginia Department of Emergency Management. You are encouraged to visit their website as well.).
• Outline of your report: Headings are helpful! o Identify homeland security (emergency management) stakeholders o Identified hazards (all hazards, natural, human, hazmat, technological) o Preparedness issues
hypothesis whereby "if an individual sees a circumstance as genuine, it is genuine in its results". Which means, conduct is reliant on an emotional translation of the real world. Fear based oppression fits this reasoning since it's anything but a given in the public arena however rather an investigation of occasions and their assumed thought processes that can impactsly affect how personalities are developed, and how these characters shape occasions and reactions to these occasions. In general, I trust fear mongering fits constructivist understanding on the grounds that, as I have investigated in this article, it doesn't exist outside of our emotional reality yet rather depends on human commitment for authenticity and presence. In spite of the fact that a social truth, this does not mean it is any less genuine and regularly it is perceived and settled upon by political associations and establishments. Subsequent to breaking down how constructivists see the world and thusly, the war on fear it illuminates how psychological oppression fits into the constructivist structure. By moving far from a state-driven standpoint, constructivists guarantee the west respond to fear based oppression dependent on how they socially build the idea of a psychological militant. Following the assault of 9/11 we can comprehend why fear based oppression loans itself more so to constructivism than it does to any customary IR speculations as there was a requirement for non-material knowledge into the apparently silly activities of this new transnational gathering. By giving us a comprehension of how operators can impact another specialists activity and how these activities communicate and develop, constructivism offers an understanding into wonders thought about irregular by standard hypothesis. Constructivist viewpoint enables us to unload the perspectives on a fear monger bunch so as to start seeing how its individuals shared feeling of respectability induces watched conduct after some time and clarifies why such conduct negates what is foreseen by the conventional hypotheses. By considering the changing idea of personal responsibility with its non-material determinants, the job of character in characterizing performers and the issues in participation and coordination looked by conventional hypotheses, "constructivism appears a superior created hypothetical focal point regarding clarifying worldwide psychological oppression and its effect on changing state behaviour". Fear based oppression fits constructivist understanding since it is a social issue that can't exist autonomous of the thoughts of the general population engaged with it.>GET ANSWER