The Homeric simile is an extended comparison between something unfamiliar, such as an epic event, and something ordinary with which the audience is familiar. Identify a Homeric simile from The Odyssey by Homer, translated by Robert Fitzgerald .and provide a brief explanation of its meaning.
the right degree of reimbursement can’t be evaluated in a non-public injury case with any exactness till the kingdom of the plaintiff has settled. consequently, the countrywide commission in now not awarding hobby at the reimbursement quantity from the date of filing of the unique criticism up to the date of payment of complete reimbursement through the appellant-doctors and the AMRI health facility to the claimant, has most unreasonable. consequently, the interest at the repayment this is decided with the aid of this courtroom within the enchantment filed by using the claimant at the charge of 6% consistent with annum on the repayment presented in these appeals from the date of grievance until the date of fee of reimbursement presented by using this courtroom, became awarded. The sentence became in favour of the claimant. vi. APPORTIONMENT OF THE reimbursement AND CONTRIBUTORY NEGLIGENCE Very often in a claim for compensation springing up out of scientific negligence a plea is taken that it's far a case of bona fide mistake which beneath positive situations may be excusable, but a mistake which might tantamount to negligence cannot be pardoned. In Para no. 123, the ideal court docket held that stated interference of the complainant can be associated and might have a few position to play to decide the amount of repayment. therefore, having held that complainant has interfered in remedy of Anuradha, NCDRC turned into willing to deduct a sum equal to ten% from the above payable amount. The most intriguing undertaking earlier than NCDRC became, to apportion the legal responsibility to pay the provided amount of reimbursement among the opposite parties. No instantly jacket formula exists or possibly can be laid down in a case in which so many doctors and hospitals are discovered negligent in the remedy of patient. The ultimate courtroom has no longer indicated the criteria for apportionment of the reimbursement amongst the other parties but going via the findings of the superb court in regard to the nature and volume of negligence in treatment at the part of the other parties and Dr. Abani Roy Chowdhury as enumerated in Para 158 to 166 of the judgment, we must apply a formulation which seems simply to us. best court has primarily found Dr. Sukumar Mukherjee and AMRI sanatorium guilty of negligence and poor in provider on numerous counts. consequently, going by means of the stated findings and observations of the superb court docket, NCDRC considered it appropriate to apportion the legal responsibility of Dr. Sukumar Mukherjee and AMRI health facility in equal portion i.e., each ought to pay 25% of the presented amount. closing half of the provided reimbursement ought to be divided among Dr. B. Haldar and Dr. Balram Prasad and Dr. Abani Roy Chowdhury (heirs of whom were given up with the aid of the complainant with the aid of forgoing his right to say reimbursement from them). liability of Dr. Sukumar Mukherjee: As regards the liability of Dr. Sukumar Mukherjee, it's miles his case that nowhere has this court in Malay Kumar Ganguly’s selection maintain the appellant Dr. Mukherjee and appellant-AMRI hospital ‘normally accountable’ for the demise of the claimant’s wife. underneath the heading of ‘cumulative impact’, the appellant’s suggest has argued that his liability isn't always hooked up by the court. The paragraphs relied upon by Dr. Mukherjee as have been referred to above are with regards to the culpability of the docs for causing the death of the affected person below IPC . it's far vital to say right here that the quantum of repayment to be paid by the appellant-medical doctors and the AMRI health facility isn't always premised on their culpability below section 304-A of IPC but on the premise in their act of negligence as doctors in treating the deceased spouse of the claimant. while Dr. Mukherjee examined Anuradha, she had rashes all over her body and this being the case of dermatology; he need to have referred her to a dermatologist. alternatively, he prescribed ‘depomedrol’ for the following 3 days on his assumption that it turned into a case of ‘vasculitis’. The dosage of one hundred twenty mg depomedrol in line with day is virtually a better dose in case of a 10 affected person or for that be counted any affected person affected by any other bypass or skin disease and the most endorsed usage via the drug producer has additionally been passed through Dr. Mukherjee. On eleven.five.1998, the in addition prescription of depomedrol without diagnosing the character of the disease is a wrongful act on his element. consistent with standard practice, longacting steroids aren't really useful in any scientific condition, as observed hereinbefore. however, in place of prescribing a short-appearing steroid, the prescription of a long-acting steroid with out foreseeing its implications is really an act of negligence on Dr. Mukherjee’s part without exercising any care or caution. It has already been said by way of the professionals and the au>GET ANSWER