Overview
In this assignment, you will summarize and explain the impact of landmark cases.

Prompt
In Project Three, you will examine landmark U.S. Supreme Court cases and their impact on police, courts, corrections, and juveniles. In this assignment, you will prepare for this project by summarizing and explaining the impact of other landmark cases.

First, choose two landmark cases from the list below and summarize them in 50-75 words.

Miranda v. Arizona
Marbury v. Madison
New Jersey v. T.L.O.
Miller v. Alabama

Then, using the same two cases you chose for summary, in 150-300 words, explain the impact these cases had on the policy, procedure, or practice of criminal justice.

Use the Module Six Assignment template to complete this assignment.

Specifically, the following rubric criteria must be addressed:

Summarize two landmark cases from the provided list.
Explain the impact of the cases you chose for summary.
What to Submit
This assignment must be completed using the provided Module Six Assignment template Word Document. Any references must be cited in APA format.

Sample Answer

Sample Answer

 

 

Impact of Landmark Cases on the Policy, Procedure, or Practice of Criminal Justice

Introduction

The U.S. Supreme Court has decided numerous landmark cases that have had a significant impact on the policy, procedure, and practice of criminal justice. These cases have shaped the way the criminal justice system operates and have established important legal precedents. In this essay, we will examine two landmark cases, Miranda v. Arizona and Marbury v. Madison, and discuss the impact they had on the criminal justice system.

Summary of Landmark Cases

Miranda v. Arizona: In this case, the Supreme Court established the now-famous Miranda rights, which require law enforcement officers to inform suspects of their right to remain silent, their right to an attorney, and the consequences of waiving these rights. The Court held that failure to provide this warning would result in any statements made by the suspect being inadmissible as evidence in court.

Marbury v. Madison: This case is significant because it established the principle of judicial review. The Supreme Court held that it has the power to declare laws unconstitutional if they violate the Constitution. This decision solidified the Court’s role as the ultimate interpreter of the Constitution and greatly expanded its power.

Impact on Policy, Procedure, or Practice of Criminal Justice

Miranda v. Arizona: The impact of the Miranda decision on the policy, procedure, and practice of criminal justice cannot be overstated. This ruling fundamentally changed police interrogation practices by requiring law enforcement officers to inform suspects of their constitutional rights before questioning. The Miranda warning has become a standard procedure in police departments across the country, ensuring that suspects are aware of their rights during custodial interrogations. This decision also significantly strengthened the protection of suspects’ Fifth Amendment rights against self-incrimination.

Furthermore, the Miranda decision had a profound impact on the admissibility of evidence in criminal trials. Prior to this case, coerced confessions were often used as evidence against defendants, even if they were obtained through unconstitutional means. However, after Miranda, any statements made by a suspect during a custodial interrogation without being properly informed of their rights are considered involuntary and inadmissible in court. This ruling has led to more careful and lawful interrogation practices by law enforcement agencies.

Marbury v. Madison: The impact of Marbury v. Madison on the policy, procedure, and practice of criminal justice lies in establishing the principle of judicial review. This decision granted the Supreme Court the power to review and strike down laws that are deemed unconstitutional. As a result, the Court became the ultimate arbiter of constitutional interpretation and gained significant authority to shape the policy and practice of criminal justice.

The principle of judicial review has allowed the Supreme Court to play a crucial role in safeguarding individual rights in criminal cases. The Court’s power to strike down laws that violate constitutional protections ensures that defendants are afforded due process and equal protection under the law. Furthermore, the ability to declare laws unconstitutional has led to significant legal reforms, such as reforms aimed at addressing racial disparities in sentencing and protecting individual privacy rights.

In conclusion, landmark cases such as Miranda v. Arizona and Marbury v. Madison have had a profound impact on the policy, procedure, and practice of criminal justice in the United States. These cases have established important legal precedents that protect individual rights and ensure fair treatment within the criminal justice system. The Miranda decision revolutionized police interrogation practices by requiring the provision of constitutional rights warnings, while Marbury solidified the Supreme Court’s power to strike down unconstitutional laws through judicial review. These landmark cases continue to shape our criminal justice system and play a vital role in upholding justice and protecting individual liberties.

This question has been answered.

Get Answer