Outline of the case: You are one of three partners in a firm of accountants.
Since five years your company serves a successful and fast-growing company “B”, engaged to prepare year-end financial statements and tax returns. The business had started trading with a handful of employees but now the company “B” has a workforce of 200.
Due to your close relationship with the directors of the company (who are its owners) and several of its staff, you become aware that staff purchases of goods manufactured by the company are authorized by production managers, and then processed outside the accounting system. The income (=”black money”) from these sales are used to fund the firm’s Christmas party.
Please analyze this case study and make your own judgment: What is the right course of action you should do?
By doing so, please answer the following questions:
What is the story behind; e.g. what does it mean what the problem states? To whom?
Who is affected? Make a stakeholder analysis
Which theories are applicable? List them and describe why they are applicable
Decide for one of the theories and analyze the case under the point of view of the theory
Make your conclusion: What do you have to do, what is the right course of action?
The better themes of up than assigned day women's activist political thought are hostile to essentialism and against foundationalism. Against essentialism connects with the deconstruction of suppositions and affirmations that persona has some natural embodiment and the grasping that persona are constantly collectively amassed, system and definitely comprised through avoidance. (Donnelly 77) 'Its drafters were tending to a specific circumstance, which they had encountered and did not have any desire to see rehashed. (Second world war) p75. Hostile to foundationalism, as I am using the period here, connects with reflexive worry of the preeminent encompasses of reality attestations or exercise universals with а viewpoint to fathoming how they have been unexpectedly settled in particular messages or memorable particular traditions of thought. Such an understanding is dared to help to the contestation of their unchallenged rank as bases thus to the democratization of considered (however not to the disposal of bases all things considered, which are crucial to thought). The possibility of central Human Rights The possibility of central Human Rights is an idea that has increased expanding noteworthiness in current society. The view that all individuals are conceived square with fundamental to the hypothesis of 'human rights' and has especially been pushed in western social orders who have ostensibly been oneself chosen police of the improvement of worldwide human rights. Human Rights have turned into a popular expression and trophy for western social orders to display civilisation and thus matchless quality. Human rights have been utilized to legitimize wars. For instance in the 'War on Terror' human rights have turned into an avocation to remedy the savageness of principally Muslim radicals' social orders. Despite the fact that it very well may be contended that human rights are basically gainful generally to western societies, upon closer examination it winds up clear that human rights are basically more helpful to the way of life to which they start from and can thusly be viewed as ethnocentric. Ethnocentrism is the idea of seeing the world from a specific social perspective. "Ethnocentrism" is the inclination to trust that one's own race or ethnic gathering is the most essential and that a few or all parts of its way of life are better than those of different gatherings. Since inside this belief system, people will pass judgment on different gatherings in connection to their own specific ethnic gathering or culture, particularly with worry to dialect, conduct, traditions, and religion. These ethnic qualifications and sub-divisions serve to characterize every ethnicity's remarkable social identity. In this exposition I will investigate human rights as an ethnocentric result of western culture with a near take a gander at ladies' human rights Asian human right speculations and culture. I will exhibit contentions for and against human rights as an ethnocentric item with particular reference to ladies' rights. I will than abridge my own feeling. In Article 1 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights 1948 states it expresses that 'every single person are conceived with equivalent rights'. Essentially The Vienna Declaration 1993 states that every one of people's rights are all inclusive, unified and related. Likewise, Globalization and Human Rights (G&HR), all in all, is worried about comprehension the "marvel" of globalization and its effect on human rights—regardless of whether it sets up a danger to human rights or makes open doors for the progression of human rights. Since globalization is treated as the key free factor, Editor Alison Brysk audits different meanings of globalization in her basic article, and part writers present their own comprehension of the term. While some allude to globalization as a procedure that began with history, others, who are awed by the fast incorporation of business sectors and the progressive changes in correspondence advancements inside the last a few decades, have a tendency to characterize it as a later marvel. They likewise contrast in their treatment of the marvel in subjective and quantitative terms. For instance, Wesley T. Milner centers around "monetary globalization" and characterizes it as the joining of economies in institutional, business and budgetary terms. Milner accentuates monetary globalization's quantitative viewpoint (without denying the subjective one) and portrays globalization. (G&HR) Human rights has come to intend to a fundamental standard in which we as a whole should live by, an arrangement of guidelines finished up by working class men in high experts in governments, it is delineated by a standard which is socially particular to their social orders and social standards and when their standard reform it is then forced all inclusive. This is especially apparent when one differentiations ladies' human rights from both western and Asian societies. Ladies' human rights are unmistakably socially particular and are addressed boundlessly. Ethnocentrism has enabled human rights to be viewed as sound however just from a western idea. Dialog Both antiessentialism and hostile to foundationalism are viewed as especially critical in а post-pioneer setting since they enrich reexamining of the manner by which the fundamental inclination of cause has been mapped on to the ethnocentric prohibition of 'Others' as second rate. Women's activists persevering in the human benefits field are stressed with the manner by which all inclusive benefits discard ladies as ladies. Be that as it may, they are less engaged with the study of all inclusive benefits in dynamic periods and more in stretching out androcentric meanings of benefits to attempt to envelop ladies' nerves inside the structure that they give. This is just to a limited extent since human benefits are, in standard at littlest, upheld by the power of states, worldwide and supranational foundations. In detail, human benefits control and associations are unwieldy a to some degree ineffectual. Indeed, even where particular gatherings have been sanctioned by states there regularly proceeds а separating among family unit and overall law. States may flag gatherings yet go erroneous to surpass pertinent enactment and decisions are made at the watchfulness of refs who might be insensible of, or hesitant to authorize, controls even where they have been passed. All things considered, the legal remaining of human benefits is detected to help to individuals' eagerness to take up benefits matters, while, emblematically, benefits talk presents а compelling dialect for requesting wrongs. (Donnelly 123-56) The outside priest of Singapore cautioned that "all inclusive acknowledgment of the perfect of human rights can be destructive if universalism is utilized to deny or cover the truth of assorted variety." (Amartya 1997) Women's activist activists in this way bolster the lengthening of human benefits, paying little heed to their limited viability, due to the manner in which they help to а legacy in which decency is facilitated as an ideal. It is acknowledged in the distributions on human benefits to part up them into three 'ages' as stated by their chronicled advancement. This is in itself cumbersome for women's activist understandings of human benefits improvement seeing that it proposes unpreventable advancement. It is useful, albeit, seeing that the particular ages were combined at unmistakable chronicled moments and through particular ideological undertakings. Ethnocentric Human Rights on its essence give off an impression of being a widespread perfect yet it isn't socially fair-minded, the qualities it maintains which is important to the belief system of human rights just end up familiar with present day organizations, anyway socially impacted. Other western societies are not acquainted with these goals and are barred from the human rights establishment. It is recommended that westerners assume that different societies are in reverse and socially substandard and thusly require these ethnocentric human rights to be presented. Human rights can be viewed as ethnocentric as it was produced in view of Western social standards, which subsequently make it important just toward the western culture. Western goals have turned into the measuring stick for humankind, trusting their convictions are the foremost standards required for this world, this type of ethnocentrism can be viewed as a type of social bondage as nations and societies seek to be tantamount to these western social orders and are socially compelled to adjust these contrary morals to be acknowledged in the social worldwide circle. In connection to ladies human rights are again regarded ethnocentric. Since forever in western societies ladies have been reject from the human rights process and advancement. They battled for a considerable length of time to get rights, for example the privilege to cast a ballot. All things considered today under the new viewpoint of human rights that ladies couldn't cast a ballot or are dealt with diversely would stun nauseate and be a social shock, in a Western nation. This exhibits human rights are besides ethnocentric as it mirrors the mood of the way of life that produces it. Anyway it is as yet evident that ladies are abhorring indistinguishable rights from men outlined in employments and wages. It is implausible to envision that ladies underwrite the idea of the 'reasonable wage' free of the authentic and social things that thought carries. Completely human rights are gendered. Women's activist have tested predominant understandings of human rights contending that they are one-sided against ladies. Ladies in the human rights framework are close enough undetectable, they are efficiently kept to the family circle so they can not strife with male centric society. All around the globe ladies have been tormented methodicallly; ladies will never be booked to enroll in human rights. The mass unpaid work ladies do in their homes and on the off chance that they work goes un-paid and unnoticed. It isn't viewed as work. On the off chance that human rights are to apply all around, why has there been a tireless and proceeding with need to qualify them regarding race, religion and sexual orientation. >GET ANSWER