The United States went through dramatic economic change during and after the Civil War, as industrialization spread rapidly and changed society. This transformation and some of the apparent abuses that developed led to an increased role of the government in regulating businesses and society. This role was heightened as government was viewed as the arbiter between business and organized labor. One can explore these developments from 1865 on through to World War II. Take one of the positions as suggested below, draw from the sources listed, and present a paper with specific examples and arguments to demonstrate the validity of your position.
Possible position—in each case you can take the pro or con position:
a. From the Progressive era through the New Deal period, political interventions generally tended to favor big corporations and hurt the common workers, leading to economic instability. (or you can argue that they helped the workers and promoted economic stability)
b. From 1865 to 1940, the development of labor unions was generally a negative force leading to economic disruption and unnecessary laws that stifled businesses and hindered job growth. (or you can take the position that labor unions had a necessary function and generally positive impact)
c. From 1865 to 1940, expansion west was devastating to Native American culture, but government policies promoted economic growth in these territories and generally equal opportunities to the settlers. (or you can take the position that government policies did not promote those benefits in those new areas)
After giving general consideration to your readings so far and any general research, select one of the positions above as your position—your thesis. (Sometimes after doing more thorough research, you might choose the reverse position. This happens with critical thinking and inquiry. Your final paper might end up taking a different position than you originally envisioned.) Organize your paper as follows, handling these issues:
1. The position you choose (from the list above)—or something close to it—will be the thesis statement in your opening paragraph.
2. To support your position, use four specific examples from different decades between 1865 and 1940.
3. Explain why the opposing view is weak in comparison to yours.
4. Consider your life today: In what way does the history you have shown shape or impact issues in your workplace or desired profession?
The priest which is a chronicled novel composed by Matthew Lewis in 1796, is noted as a standout amongst the most entangled among the great gothic books that were distributed in those circumstances; in the vicinity of 1764 and 1820). From the asking, the novel depicts uncovers sexuality and the importance of "catholic" desire and interbreeding. The novel later overted the convoluted and homoerotic subtleties of sexuality which have stunned and charmed those perusers who have confidence in the more virtuous and devoted oeuvres of Radcliffe Ann. The proposition of the novel which can be viewed as "the dark legend of devout Catholism" was consented to and maintained by those people who were antagonistic to the Catholic Church in France and England (Steven Blakemore, 1998). As indicated by Steven, Catholism maintained a strategic distance from the unadulterated religion which thus advanced degenerate sexual practices which originated from the unnatural promises of celibacy that abused 'nature'. The sexual constraint of catholic empowered the dark craftiness that secured the orgiastic sexuality did in unnatural and religious communities and cloisters. In England, the vilification of sex by the atypical catholic "other' was a piece of the ideological arrangement of national personality of protestants in England. Besides the priest was distributed when france was at war with England and the French upheaval was as yet connected with the fear. Thus there were a progression of political and sexual nerves, specifically tensions concerning ladylike men and manly men. These nerves are additionally associated with the specific situations and writings of "The Monk". As per Steven, despite the fact that the pundits have for along time concentrated on the sensual measurements of the novel, its numerous reversals in sex and religion and in addition the ideological ramifications of the specialists, have not yet been methodicallly assessed. Lewis in his written work of the priest, he performs phonetically what might as well be called a dark mass, while subverting and upsetting the conventional reasons for sex and religion, which is an unexpected correspondence of the evil services in the novel. This paper focuses on the centrality of sexual and religious reversals in the novel "The Monk" while making references to the gendered dialect of gentility and manliness. The paper additionally stretches out its examination to the way these reversals illuminate about the association amongst misogyny and ladylike, catholic "Other" in the protestant talk of the eighteenth century. Sexual and religious reversals in "The Monk" The possibility of against Catholicism in the priest is fundamentally depicted through Ambrosio; who was a main catholic lowlife. Ambrosio was found as a newborn child at the entryway of convent, raised by the congregation, however last progressed toward becoming pizazz. Having been raised by the congregation, Ambrosio rose to the situation of abbot and was commended in the entire of Madrid while being regarded for his excellence especially his strict regard for virtue. Since the starting, Ambrosio is placed in a 'ladylike' position, as a youthful virgin who is shielded and secured with the goal that she can keep up her uprightness and blamelessness. All the more so Ambrosio isn't natural to the world and its enticements. In "the priest", the accentuation on devout male modesty by the catholic, which is typically a denounced issue in the writing of Protestants, has its base in female temperance and virginity, which has been an issue in a large portion of the books and direct books of the nineteenth century. In t this specific situation, Ambrosio is especially identified with Antonio who is additionally a shielded and ensured youthful virgin and similarly obscure to the world and its allurements simply like Ambrosio (p.12). In this story, Antonio and Ambrosio are a sister and a sibling however them two don't know about the blood relationship since they had been isolated amid their initial ages. Then again both Antonio and Ambrosio appear to have a sublimated, common forbidden fascination. An admirer of Antonio, who was known as Lorenzo, recognized Ambrosio to Antonio and her close relative Leonella while specifically showing Ambrosio as a virgin by alluding to his story; where he was found and how he was raised. Ambrosio was discovered/found at the capuchins entryway and was in this way to a great extent accepted to a "present" from Virgin Mary (p.17). Ambrosio who was thirty years around then, had lived in confinement from the outside world and thusly knew nothing about sex, really "he was a strict eyewitness of celibacy and remained unaware of what comprised the contrast between a man and a lady" (p.17). His character was undisputable, and had not been recolored. The creator of "the priest" utilizes suggestively gendered dialect, to influence the male priest to seem like a heavenly righteous female and after that associates him with Antonio a female who is additionally oblivious of sex. Leonella's crazy answer that Antonio, much the same as Ambrosio does not know the distinction between a man and lady and that she sees everyone as being of a similar sex with herself, happen to interface "the same" sibling and sister together (pp17-18). The creators point in utilizing similitudes and suggestively gendered dialect is to demonstrate that the promises of virtue in catholic feminize priests then's identity made powerless to lip service and allurement by their sexual obliviousness. This is underscored when Rosaria, a beast covered as a youthful male novitiate, unveils that he is really a lady. Rosaria, whose genuine name was Matilda had reformulated Leonella's unworkable objective. Much the same as Antonio, Ambrosio should overlook that Matilda was a lady since she had camouflaged her sex so she could be companions with Leonella and shield him from sexual information (p.63). The way that Matilda is really a malevolent soul (evil presence), who professes to be a lady while she is a man, misuses the sexual discussion and in addition gets perplexity of sex parts the novel. Sexual information in the novel is seen as the illegal apple which makes which entices insinuatingly the feminized priest to fall. Matilda is in the meantime model fatale lady who later ruins the excellencies of Ambrosio. Anyway greetings malevolent temptation is improved by Ambrosio's obliviousness on sexual issues which at that point makes him extremely vulnerable to Matilda's enticement. Ambrosio assesses his curbed appreciation for Matilda by rehashing her alluring contentions in the wake of demonstrating her bareness to him; "may I not securely credit her declarations? Will it not be simple for me to overlook her sex and think about her as my companion and as my follower?, She endeavored to keep me in insensible of her sex.. She has not made endeavors to animate my sleeping interests, nor has she at any point speaked with me till this night regarding the matter of adoration" (PP.66-67). As per Lewis (), prelapsarian obliviousness and guiltlessness of information about sex is a figment, consequently Ambrosio is effectively attracted into sexual association with the misleading Matilda: the sexual suppression in conclusion winds up in the very learning which the priest was denying. Ambrosio is likewise additionally feminized by vocabulary that is particularly gendered which logically separated by the female from the male sex, yet them its turned away and reapplied by Lewis to the focal catholic antagonist of the novel. In the eighteenth century such words like temperance, honesty, disgrace and respect, had a gendered importance. For instance a, word like righteousness originated from a Latin word vir which implies man, while virtus suggested manly quality, magnificence and bravery. For the most part the word implied male ethicalness. In spite of the fact that it had different implications, when connected to the genders the word meant sexual division of work. In "the priest', simply like a gendered virgin of the eighteenth century, Ambrosio is regarded for his prudence, especially his virtue which on the opposite side makes him vulnerable to allurements of sex. In the early piece of the book, Lorenzo demonstrates that despite the fact that the character of Ambrosio is undisputable since he had experienced childhood in the religious community for as long as he can remember, he is along these lines not prepared to confront the world together with its allurements. Lorenzo noticed that being a priest the religious obligations of Ambrosio will influence him to go into the outside existence where his prudence and exemplary nature will be put to test. The Monk's various sexual, religious intercessions and their chaperon ideological ramifications have not been efficiently investigated." He goes ahead to state, "In this specific situation, I center around the importance of the novel's sexual and religious reversals with reference to the gendered dialect of "manliness" and womanliness,">GET ANSWER