Select two companies, both in the same industry, from the list below.
Consumer electronics Dell, Panasonic, LG, Hewlett Packard, Samsung, Fujitsu
Chemicals BASF, Ineos, Bayer, Sinopec, AkzoNobel, Toray
Pharmaceuticals Eli Lilly, AstraZeneca, Roche, Sanofi, Gilead Sciences, Novartis
Airlines Etihad, Qatar Airways, Qantas, Singapore Airlines, Delta Airlines, Lufthansa
Automakers Toyota, PSA, SAIC, Hyundai, Volkswagen. Tata
Sportswear Under Armour, ASICS, Reebok, Nike, EA Sports, Adidas
PC’s Acer, Lenovo, IBM, Asus, Dell, Toshiba,
1 Discuss similarities and differences in the organizational culture of the two companies selected with respect to artifacts, values, and core assumptions.
2 Discuss ethical and positive elements in the two cultures.
3 Discuss similarities and differences in aspects of the organizational structure of the two companies.
(Points 1,2,3 make up the descriptive part of the paper)
4 Explain factors behind similarities/differences in the culture and structure of the two companies selected.
5 Evaluate the fit between structure and culture in each of the two companies compared.
(Points 4, 5 make up the analytical part of the paper. This part requires more attention and thinking)
The auxiliary practical worldview is a system for the structure of society. The auxiliary useful approach tells that all parts in the general public cooperates keeping in mind the end goal to frame an amicable, sensible and stable society. This approach sees the general public as a full scale level introduction. Every last part is interrelated and it is worries with expansive examples that shape society in general. The bigger social organizations of the general public, for example, populace, training, economy, government assume imperative parts on forming our lives. The family is considered as the most ideal body creation of the social association since family is the most basic and nearest social structure which each individual connected to. For instance, expect that if the understudies are absent, the educators would not exist also. Since there is an interrelated connection between the understudies and educators which speaks to that the general public is a mind boggling framework where parts arrange together to adjust and settle the development. Auguste Comte, the "Father of Sociology" said that it is critical to keep the general public together in light of the fact that numerous customs were debilitated because of the fast difference in the mankind. Herbert Spencer connected the general public to the human body. For instance, a general public is formed by an expansive number of people as an entire useful gathering. In human body, numerous cells and tissues frame the organs of the living being, for example, hands, eyes, nose, mouth, ears, and so on. Different organs of the living being have its one of a kind highlights to address the issues of the life form and to keep up its survival. So also, different social structures have its one of a kind highlights to address the issues of the group and give a stable and adjust society. Contextual investigation of Structural-Functional Paradigm The social structures of marriage and family make profound social and passionate securities that give people top to bottom frameworks of help and produce desires of social duty inside their individuals, accomplishing the capacity of making social attachment. Fundamentally, life partners bolster each other monetarily, socially, sincerely and physically and are headed to accomplish by socially characterized expected guidelines of wedded life. Families give similar frameworks of help for the greater part of their relatives, giving solid settings and chances to singular development for the kids. The auxiliary - functionalism viewpoint sees the family doing its part by setting up its individuals in a way that will profit the general public. The family resembles a body or framework and every part performs fundamentally critical capacities. Likewise, the heart is subject to the lungs and cerebrum for the body to work legitimately. In the event that one section or a man isn't doing its or his/her part then it is said to be useless. The family is said to be not working in general and something isn't right with that family. Social-Conflict Paradigm The social-clash worldview is additionally a large scale arranged worldview. The social-clash worldview is one of the thoughts of Karl Marx. He trusts that social-clash is unavoidable. It is the main thrust to enhance and advance to a superior society. People contend with each other to obtain the most extreme advantages. The social-clash hypothesis contradicts with the basic utilitarian hypothesis where the social parts cooperate to settle the general public. A man who postures forces and assets have a tendency to persecute different gatherings which are bring down social class and this subsequent in social-clash. One will likewise have the capacity to constrain others to acknowledge his/her perspectives in the event that they have the expert. Social-clash not just occurs between various classes, it can likewise happen in different religious, ethnics, social, and so forth. The request of individuals is interminable, when the most fundamental wants are met, new needs will then develop. For instance, pacers need to have a bicycle; bicyclists need to have a motorbike; motorcyclists intend to purchase an auto... The requirements and wants of people are unending caused people need to buckle down each day to satisfy their wants. Be that as it may, this marvel in the long run prompts a dynamic culture on the grounds that everybody endeavors to accomplish their requirements. Contextual analysis of Social-Conflict Paradigm A contention scholar may ask, "Who profits by the current higher instructive framework?" The appropriate response, for a contention scholar sensitive to unequal dispersions of riches, is the well off. The instructive framework regularly screens out poorer people, not on the grounds that they can't contend scholastically, but rather in light of the fact that they can't bear to pay for their training. Since the poor can't acquire advanced education, they are for the most part additionally unfit to land higher paying positions, in this way they stay poor. The functionalist may state that the capacity of training is to teach the workers, a contention scholar may call attention to that it additionally has a component of contention and imbalance, favoring one gathering (the well off) finished different gatherings (poor people). Pondering instruction along these lines delineates why both functionalist and strife hypotheses are useful in seeing how society functions. Emblematic collaboration Paradigm Emblematic collaboration hypothesis centers around the investigation of the connection between the individual and others. It is a smaller scale level introduction which underlines the social communications between the people in some particular circumstances. As individuals associate with each other, a man's mindfulness is the consequence of the judgment from the encompassing individuals. The emblematic communication hypothesis advocate people have their own "self", and on account of this "self" individuals play a "part" of others, and they pick up the capacity to take a gander at themselves through the eyes of others. On the off chance that one doesn't be able to cooperate with the general population and society, the social strength can't be kept up. On account of the common reality that human made, the human social association can be steady, grow and kept up. George Herbert Mead says that emblematic communication has three qualities: It has a clarification on the conduct of others; there is an unmistakable procedure, which implies one is prepared to tell others when they accomplish something; have a forecast on others response, which can anticipate what they do will cause what reactions from others. This relies upon the communication between two people have a common significance of the image framework. Mead considers society to be a sorted out collaboration between various people, this intelligent type of association relies upon the part of the soul, yet in addition to set up an inner correspondence process based on the utilization of significant images. Contextual investigation of Symbolic-Interaction Paradigm Consider applying representative interactionism to the marriage. The things, for example, duties between life partners, a white marriage dress, a wedding cake, a wedding function, a wedding ring and blossoms are the images of marriage. Individuals relate some broad implications to these images. For specific people, they keep up their own particular view of what significance are these images conveying. For example, one of the life partners may see their wedding bands as an image of "interminable love" while the other may simply consider them to be a straightforward budgetary cost. Much broken correspondence can come about because of the view of various individuals on similar occasions and images. Plus, the general population wed symbolizes that people require a partner for their life. It symbolizes that each individual needs monetarily, socially, sincerely and physically backings to lead an adjusted and enduring lifetime.>GET ANSWER