1) Online, go to the CIA World Factbook.
2) Look on the right hand side a couple of inches down for “Select a Country or Location.”
3) Select the United States. When the appropriate screen appears, scroll down and click on “People and Society.”
4) Scroll down until you find the infant mortality rate for the United States. Write this number down. You only need to write down the figure given for “Total.”
5) Find the infant mortality rate for Cuba (“Total”) and write it down.
6) Find the infant mortality rate for eight additional countries and write down the information. Four of the eight countries should be fully developed nations (Most Industrialized Nations), while the other four should be developing nations (Industrializing Nations and Least Industrialized Nations.) If you do not know which countries fall into which category, consult pages 236-237 of your text.
7) Arrange the information in columns, with the country having the lowest infant mortality rate listed on top (#1) and the country with the highest infant mortality rate on the bottom (#10). The first column should have the country name. The second column should have the country’s infant mortality rate.
8) Write a paragraph in which you summarize your findings. How does the United States compare to other nations? Offer a sociological explanation as to why this might be the case.
Now do the same with regard to life expectancy. You are going to submit two charts: one with IMR data, the other with life expectancy data. In addition, you are to submit two summary paragraphs: one on IMR, the other on life expectancy. This is where you talk about how the United States compares to other nations on these two ‘quality of life’ measures, offering a sociological explanation as to why this might be the case.
But what if there is no crime at all? The incredible advances in modern day technology can heavily facilitate or even guarantee the control of crime regularity. The idea of a new form of society which is designed to be completely crime-free is known as the “surveillance state”, it specifically aims at breaking down systematic societal problems and crime rates by increasing surveillance in all areas (Pensador, 2012). In the US, the first step toward this techno-fascist idea has already been made when private companies began hoarding license-plate data from local drivers (G.W. Schulz, 2012). This can undoubtedly resolve the prominent crime issues. But within the bowels of this system we are sacrificing our democracy and freedom, we are submitting ourselves to a totalitarian and oppressive power. Imagine a society where there are no criminals at all, and every prostitute, drug dealer, and criminals of other victimless crimes are instantly arrested with heavy penalties. The existence of these people is what signifies the price of freedom, they are the reminder that we are still living in a free system. Maimonides, famed Jewish philosopher, once used an analogy to explain such situation. If you suppress your body’s inborn ability to fight off diseases by eating tons of medicine, you will die very quickly. If society forcefully oppresses the normality of crime, eventually it will only provoke the opposite of the desired outcome. Organized crime, for instance, was one of the most common form of deviance under the extreme prohibition of gambling, prostitution and drugs in the 1920s (Florien, 2009). Therefore, a small degree of crime plays an important role in guarding the privilege of our body politics and provide us room to express ourselves. The controversy on the effects of crime can also be discussed under the context of how it justifies our legal systems and promotes job creation. The practicability of law towards crime shows how significant our legal system is in the maintenance of our society. The diversity of law and how it specifically tackles various criminal behaviors is physical proof of why the legal system is still extremely viable nowadays. But, in turn, this cannot be made possible without the prevalence of crime. Law would simply be a set of groundless rules that can hardly be applied to the public, and it would not be able to fully exercise its function. Similarly, crime is also a necessity when it comes to creating jobs. The police department, occupations in the legal sector, private security etc, all these are jobs upheld by the presence of crime. In every superhero movie, a well-developed antagonist is crucial in order to have an interesting and coherent storyline, that is the same in real life. Ironically crime is a problem that needs to be fixed, but its complete extermination could mean a certain level of losses as well. The essential debate of crime is the debate of how an equilibrium can be achieved betw>GET ANSWER