Select a central concept (theme) that is important to the nature of being human.
Some ideas include citizenship, rights and responsibilities, consumerism, work ethic, grief, earth stewardship, courtship, marriage, coming-of-age rituals, class, race, gender, education, home, elder care, childbirth, child-rearing, sports, pets, criminal justice, food and meal-sharing, entertainment, funeral practices, religious/ spiritual practices, the arts, vacations, leisure time, hobbies, or another theme approved by instructor.
Show how your theme manifests itself in three different cultures.
Use three historical periods or three contemporary cultures. For example, you might choose to explore courtship in 15th-century Italy, 18th-century England, and 20th-century South Africa. Alternatively, you could consider a theme within three contemporary cultures (for example, funeral practices in Canada, Egypt, and Mexico today).
Locate and quote directly from at least three credible secondary sources (journal articles, etc.). Including relevant primary source material is certainly welcome but optional. Weave in quoted passages smoothly and document information correctly.
Conclude with your “Why should my reader care about this?” response to the chosen theme. Address these questions: Why does this topic matter on both an individual and global level? What can/ should we learn by taking a closer look at this topic?
Your written topic proposal (5%) will be due prior to final paper submission. It should offer a one-page, double-spaced description of your theme and at least one secondary source you plan to use.
• Your paper should be 4-5 pages in length (not including Works Cited page), double-spaced, 12-point font.
• Create a solid thesis statement, organize topics, and synthesize your ideas with source material.
• Revise with usage, clarity, and cohesion in mind. Ideally, read your work aloud to “hear” language.
• Use MLA (8th ed.) style for citing at least three credible secondary sources.
• Start with the A-B Tech Library databases as you conduct research: Locke Library.
• Check in with an A-B Tech Writing Center consultant (optional): Writing Center.
Singular Research Paper and Presentation In the early piece of this course, you invested energy surveying how to: ? Direct essential business related research using our library's assets ? Execute appropriate proficient accuracy regarding composing and language ? Maintain a strategic distance from unoriginality issues with appropriate synopsis, citing and using legitimate references. It is presently time to display those abilities by following the rules beneath. This task is worth 100 focuses add up to (65 focuses for the paper and 35 focuses for the oral introduction). Using our Texas A&M Library databases found at: https://tamuct.libguides.com/file. At that point tap on A-Z Databases and use the accompanying: ** Recommended Top Five Library Databases ? Scholarly Search Complete ? ProQuest ? JSTOR ? EBSCO Host ** ? Business Source Complete ** (Login: Is your Canvas sign-in and secret key) You should: ? Discover three academic, peer inspected diary articles (one might be a web article) managing correspondence issues in business. The issue can't be 'made up' – it must be genuine. o The articles may talk about great or terrible correspondence procedures or ; o Describe occurrences where organizations battled or had extraordinary accomplishment in imparting. o The articles must be inside the most recent 5 years and can be inside any industry. o Each article can be about an alternate issue inside a business Subsequent to perusing the articles, you have to set up the accompanying: A 6 page singular research paper: (1 Cover Page, 4 Body, and 1 Reference page) 65 focuses. Utilize the layout accommodated this task. ? Your synopses ought to illustrate: o Mastery of expert accuracy o Proper synopsis of your articles and the correspondence issues o APA style when all is said in done (a cover page, twofold separated, 1 inch edges, Times New Roman or Arial 12 pt textual style, utilization of in-content references, and a reference page). 50. Behavioralism Readiness For this evaluation, you will inspect how behaviorism and social subjective hypotheses could be connected in an ordinary learning circumstance. To start with, select one of the four contextual analyses exhibited in the Case Study media piece in the Required Resources territory. You will utilize this contextual analysis to finish not just this appraisal, however evaluations 2 and 5 too. Directions Reflecting upon what you have found out about behaviorism and social psychological hypotheses, depict the fundamental precepts of every hypothesis. Utilizing hypothesis particular wording, portray the components of your chose contextual analysis that identify with every hypothesis. What components of the contextual investigation would be imperative from a behaviorist point of view? What components of the contextual investigation would be imperative from a social psychological point of view? Imagine that the character in the situation has beaten her or his learning hindrance. Clarify how one may accomplish his or her objective upheld by every one of the learning hypotheses. Finish the accompanying: Portray the essential principles of behaviorism. Portray the essential principles of social intellectual hypothesis Apply behaviorism and social psychological hypothesis wording and ideas to contextual investigation. Clarify how both behaviorism and social psychological hypothesis may be utilized to determine the issue introduced for the situation think about. Extra Requirements Length: 5– 7 pages (not including your cover sheet or references), twofold separated, 12-point text style. Number of references: Minimum of 5 references. Article refinements: There are three unique kinds of articles. Research articles display unique research, audit articles talk about research as of now exhibited somewhere else, and study articles are far reaching audit articles that talk about a whole field or zone of research. References to books are adequate, yet they ought to be kept to a base—most likely close to five. APA style: You should utilize legitimate APA style to refer to and list your references. Allude to the Writing Center's APA Style and Format rules (situated in the Proposed Resources) for more data. Organization: Use the accompanying structure: Cover page (your name, your specialization or program, title and course number, current quarter and year, and teacher's name). Body, including headings and subheadings over the proper substance. Reference list. Allude to the APA Style and Format rules for extra arranging data. Style: Write in the third individual as an unbiased storyteller. Maintain a strategic distance from the utilization of I, we, or you. Specifically, evade phrases like "I think" for phrases like "the confirm recommends" or "look into demonstrates." In science, genuine belief conveys no weight unless bolstered by a blend of observational research and measurable or consistent numerical induction. Different notes: Avoid since quite a while ago cited entries from your source writings. This ought to be your very own combination thoughts, in your own particular words—regardless of whether your thoughts allude to the first thoughts of others, in which case the references ought to be unequivocal. Composing at the graduate level ought to be insightful and in excess of an insignificant synopsis. It should show an extraordinary theory or possibly a critical point you are endeavoring to make, adding considerably to what is now known about your subject. Your point or proposal will stand or fall exclusively on its quality—that is, the quality and amount of the confirmation you show. Organization Overview 1.1. Foundation synopsis (close to one page) History: Briefly condense the organization's history and build up a concise course of events of the organization that incorporates the date of the establishing and major corporate occasions including IPOs, M&A's, CEO advances, other significant occasions (e.g., insolvency filings), and so forth.; Objectives: Briefly abridge the organization's vision and mission. Items/Services: What are the organization's specialty units? Abridge its item offerings as well as administrations? 2.2. Execution Summary (close to one and a half pages) Monetary Performance: Select any two execution measures/proportions of the accompanying: Earnings per Share, Price-Earnings Ratio, Debt-Equity Ratio or Return on Equity. At that point, in partitioned diagrams, plot the organization's execution measure over a five-year time span looking at the measure against those of the organization's best 2 or 3 contenders and the business normal. In a short passage, translate the plots and express your fundamental decisions from these plots. In view of your discoveries, talk about whether the organization is getting a charge out of upper hand or enduring focused disservice. Financial specialist Performance: In a solitary diagram, plot the organization's stock cost against the stock costs of its best three rivals and the S&P 500 file for as far back as five years. Make note of any stock parts, stock buybacks, and so forth. At that point, in one table, condense the stock experts' purchase/offer proposals of stock examiners (see Yahoo! Fund or LexisNexis Scholastic). Contrast this data with the organization's best three rivals. At long last, in a short section, compress the data and evaluate the organization's speculator execution. Whatever degree is the organization meeting financial specialist desires? Representative Performance: Find any data on the organization's execution in setting of its workforce. Search for rankings of the "best organizations to work for," Glassdoor surveys, news reports of work inconveniences (e.g., claims) and so forth. At that point, in a short section, survey the organization's worker execution. What exactly degree is the organization prepared to do fulfilling its workers' needs? Is the organization evaluated a decent boss? Manageability and CSR Performance: Find data concerning the organization's natural execution (e.g., rankings of "green organizations" and friends natural projects) and CSR giving record. Condense your key discoveries in one section. Execution Summary: In a short section, compress what the execution appraisal uncovers about the organization. A decent money related investigation goes past the numbers and makes guesses about developing patterns and likely key ramifications of the numbers, regularly by joining bits of knowledge from different components of the budgetary proclamations. Think about some of these inquiries in your exchange: How does the execution of the organization contrast and its rivals? In the course of recent years, has the organization's execution enhanced or decay? In view of your investigation, does it show up that the company's execution measurements are going the correct way? 2. SWOT Analysis (close to two pages) 2.1 Opportunities and Threats Summary Openings: Based on the outer investigation you had directed in SAP Part 1, unmistakably distinguish and abridge the best three open doors recognized by the outer ecological investigations. Dangers: Based on the outer investigation you had directed in SAP Part 1, unmistakably distinguish and abridge the best three dangers recognized by the outer natural investigation. 2.2 Strength and Weaknesses 2.2.1 Company Resources: Consider the organization's asset base in the following four classifications. Quantitatively/Qualitatively survey the organization's assets over every one of these classifications concerning its essential contenders. Money related Resources: Consider the organization's present resources, getting limit, and its capacity to create supports rapidly either inside (e.g., move cash starting with one business then onto the next) or remotely (e.g., extra getting or stock deal). Physical Resources: Consider the organization's physical assets including building and property resources (claimed or rented), its business areas, and geographic access to item advertises, geographic access to supply markets, and additionally plants and gear. HR: Consider the administration aptitude and experience of the organization's best administration group. Look at the aptitude and experience of your organization's best administration group (i.e., Chairman, President, and COO, if relevant) to those of its main three opponents. Authoritative Resources: Consider the organization's way of life, notoriety, mark personality, trademarks, copyrights, licenses, exchange privileged insights, other protected innovation, and so on. 2.2.2 Company Capabilities: Consider the organization's capacities in the following four classifications. Quantitative/Qualitatively survey the organization's assets over every one of these classes concerning its essential contenders. >GET ANSWER