Scenario: You are interviewing for a position as a law enforcement officer who will be expected to interact regularly with juveniles and adults. The hiring committee wants to choose a candidate who can write clearly and who demonstrates a solid understanding of standard procedures in the juvenile versus criminal justice systems.
Write a 850- to 1,050-word paper comparing the procedures that law enforcement officers and courts should follow when interacting with juveniles versus adults during the stages of intake, prosecution, adjudication, and disposition.
Choose 1 of the following videos from the University Library of a court session to use as an example scenario for this assignment:
Rodrick: Juvenile Court in Session
Morris: Juvenile Court in Session
Kenneth: Juvenile Court in Session
Kymyada: Juvenile Court in Session
Complete the following in your paper:
Summarize the case you chose and the legal issues facing the juvenile and the court.
Define the role and key parameters of the juvenile justice system.
Explain the function of juvenile vs. adult courts.
Summarize the court’s philosophy of juvenile justice used in this case.
Explain how law enforcement and the courts might have interacted differently with this person as a juvenile than if he or she had been an adult.
Summarize the rights and confidentiality protections that exist for this juvenile that are not the same for adults. Use the State Profiles from the National Juvenile Defender Center, and include at least 1 policy specific to your state that would be relevant in this case.
Describe at least 2 additional factors that officers and the court must consider for the juvenile in this case that may not work the same way for adults.
Use language and terms appropriate for each justice system when comparing juveniles versus adults.
On Wednesday, January 3, the New York Times announced that Governor Cuomo was following the lead of Oregon and Tennessee and revealing a proposition to make open school allowed to New York inhabitants under a particular pay level – with one curve. In contrast to Oregon and Tennessee, which make a two-year training at the junior college free, Governor Cuomo has extended the idea to most four-year state schools in New York. Free school – How lucky for New York inhabitants. Or then again would it be advisable for me to state, how tragic? New York inhabitants will currently have the capacity to run in huge numbers to foundations that are now packed and produce troubling outcomes. The default rate on understudy credits at New York state funded colleges and universities was 9.3% for the 2012 companion. What’s more, the finish rate at New York junior colleges is just 20.6%. So how about we perceive how this will function. We will urge understudies to go to a school where just a little measure of entering understudies procure a degree. What’s more, obviously, we won’t probably prevent understudies from taking out an understudy advance. Probably not! The expense of participation as determined by the school and directed by the U.S. Bureau of Education far exceeds educational cost and incorporates food and lodging, transportation and the sky is the limit from there. Furthermore, schools can’t disallow understudies from obtaining more than the expense of educational cost. The outcome? Understudies will enlist at a “free school” and obtain cash for the expense of participation. At that point, they will drop out and have an understudy advance – yet no aptitudes. Splendid. Then, is the “free school” truly free? Obviously not. State funded training is supported essentially by property charge. So expenses will go up and all property proprietors – regardless of whether they have school age kids or not – will, truth be told, pay for the free school. No, let me revamp that. They will pay for the free educational cost while prospective school dropouts use understudy advances. At that point, when the understudies going to “free” school default on their understudy credit, the citizen will indeed bear the weight.>GET ANSWER