Go to SCI: Skin Cancer Investigation and enter the site. Begin with the Healthy Skin section and read about the three layers of the skin by clicking on the image of the skin on the right. Next answer these questions:
What are the types of cells in the epidermis and how are they related to each other?
What is melanin and what is its role in the epidermis?
What is keratin and what does it do?
What are the two primary features of the dermis?
Describe the subcutaneous tissue.
To continue through the interactive, click on the right arrow at the bottom of the screen to go to the section Effects of the Sun on the Skin and watch the animation about the benefits of the sun and risks of sunlight. Then answer these questions:
Name the main benefits of sunlight.
What are some of the benefits of the sun’s UV rays?
How are these rays harmful?
Now go to the section titled Causes and read about how over-exposure to the sun can cause skin cancer. Watch the animation on how normal cells multiply and divide to replace damaged or dead cells. Then answer these questions:
How do UV rays affect normal cell division?
Why do some people have a greater chance of developing skin cancer compared to others?
Continue on to Tumors and answer this question:
What are the main differences between benign and malignant tumors?
Now click on and read the Common Risk Factors. Click on each factor to learn more about the risks. Then answer these questions:
What are the five most common modifiable risk factors of skin cancer?
How can where you live increase your chances of developing skin cancer?
How does genetics play a role?
What is actinic keratosis?
Now go to the Glowell Clinic: Lab. Click on any patient file where an image of a growth will appear along with the patient’s history.
Review the list of symptoms and check those that describe the growth. Decide whether the growth is cancerous or not. Select the next patient and complete the same steps.
ations need to cooperate with one another through law, which administers harmony between them; this is a prime case of the reluctant individual and their self-rule, and the desire of everybody: a country is one living being, yet so as to endure, it needs unions with different countries (436-437, 162-164; 547, 245-246). The non military personnel world is managed by the state as the police power and the legal executive, just as business, are directed by the administration: this shows regular citizen society should be controlled and that individuals should be seen as a person by the state in such a case that they acted towards their very own advantages, this would make opportunity be superseded by boisterousness in and perhaps by these foundations which could cause irregular characteristics inside and issues with different states – everybody must cooperate so as to be free people (Hegel 423-429, 151-157; 533-534, 235-236; 543-547, 242-246; 550-552, 249-256). Be that as it may, I contend Hegel is to some degree wrong in requiring others to perceive one's self-sufficiency in that individuals may either be unaffected by the open unsure and needn't bother with them, or could lose the vast majority of their opportunities on account of the state's constraints on them (423-429, 151-157; 436-437, 162-164; 543-547, 242-246; 550-552, 249-256). While I do feel that establishments and laws are fundamental for controlling how one uses their self-rule, I accept that the state is as yet equipped for winding up like common society by making more disparities towards its residents: for instance, a narcissistic ruler may not perceive anybody's opportunity yet their own, for example, declining to work with different countries in the event that it sometimes falls short for their needs and dismissal the privileges of their natives by utilizing the law and constitution to their own advantage (Hegel 483-487, 217-219; 496-502, 222-223; 543-547, 242-246; 550-552, 249-256). Narcissism can apparently make the self image just see their character and rights, regardless of others: this could make them abuse laws since they would feel that they are above them (Hegel 483-487, 217-219; 496-502, 222-223; 543-547, 242-246; 550-552, 249-256). It would conflict with Hegel's contention that the state gives equity and opportunity on the grounds that the ruler would not be worried about attempting to make everybody equivalent under the law, just how to make it work for themselves (423-429, 151-157; 483-487, 217-219; 496-502, 222-223; 539-540, 237-240). While others may perceive the ruler as so like with the ace and the worker, it isn't really required if the ace is narcissistic and accepts they are the most dominant at any rate (Hegel 430-437, 157-164). Moreover, if the hesitant individual requires others all together for their personality to be perceived, at that point they were ostensibly never allowed regardless (Hegel 423-429, 151-157). On the off chance that that were valid, at that point it would mean the individual would need to adjust to the either the non military personnel society or the express regardless, in the dread that their privileges would be removed on the off chance that they didn't (Hegel 423-429, 151-157; 543-547, 242-246; 550-552, 249-256). For instance, detail>GET ANSWER