Looking at the course through two lenses, process and product, respond to the following:
Process – How did you like using Teams? Did you like the TEDTalks? How about the videos by Northouse, and those recommended by the textbook? Did you like doing the assessments as part of the discussion forums, or would you rather have compiled them in a course journal?
Product – You have been doing a considerable amount of introspection on yourself as a leader, particularly through your weekly assessments and blog posts. This week, be sure to take advantage of the reading (“Solitude and Leadership”) and video (“Randy Pausch’s Last Lecture”) for some final thoughts. Share any comments here. What is one action step you will be taking because of this course?
Marshall’s citizenship theory is worried with social rights, education, and voting. Marshall’s principle on citizenship is well matched with Britain in 2017 because of the reality that schools are prompted via ideological, monetary, and cultural forces, and citizenship considers the way wherein schooling functions in elegance formation, struggle, capital accumulation, and the legitimation of the privileges of dominant corporations (Apple, 2017:4). In reality, there is no doubt that colleges are establishments of monetary and cultural duplicate (Apple, 2017). in addition, Marshall (2009:149) opines that the institutions maximum carefully connected to citizenship and civilisation are the educational device and the social services. Citizenship has also raised questions on the experience of social harmony and integration in any given community (Turner, 1990). for that reason, citizenship, and each idealised version of it, holds relevance today. Marshall’s theory specifically, has relevance in 2017 because of the truth that there are several wonderful kinds of citizenship, and each may be understood by way of taking Marshall’s vision of citizenship as a whole, instead of a sum of parts. Turner (1997) notes that society is confronted with two contradictory concepts: shortage and social team spirit. shortage consequences in exclusionary occasions consisting of gender divisions, social training, and status groups, whilst social cohesion calls for cohesive community systems, regardless of one’s social standing (Turner, 1997). Gender divisions are the only region that Marshall’s idea on citizenship fails to don't forget. in addition to the above traits of Marshall’s concept, Marshall’s concept on citizenship taken into consideration legal rights because the first form of citizenship (Turner, 1997). in the 19th century, political rights and their institutionalisation in parliament was Marshall’s 2nd perception of citizenship (Turner, 1997). subsequent, Marshall believed that citizenship become related to social rights, and that the ones social rights had been institutionalised within the welfare nation (Turner, 1997). whilst considering those 3 forms of rights, Marshall argued that citizenship mitigates the inequalities created by means of capitalism (Turner, 1997:eleven). Marshall referred to fashionable industrialist capitalist societies as ‘hyphenated societies,’ due to the truth that such societies have a few degree of democratic redistribution of wealth thru the group of citizenship. Marshall’s idea on citizenship is based on publish-warfare societies and their relationships among social class, welfare, and citizenship (Turner, 1997). at the heart of Marshall’s idea on citizenship is identification. as an example, modern Britain has confronted anxiety in granting unconditional comprehensive citizenship to Hong Kong nationals (Turner, 1997). Turner (1997:7) describes this idea as ‘social closure’ wherein citizenship is determined on an inclusion/exclusion foundation, in an attempt to exclude ‘outsiders’ and power out range. The idea of social closure continues to be a pervasive concept in 2017, as evidenced by “Brexit.” Openness to variety and difference is an important factor of a liberal democracy (Turner, 1997), yet the sentiment of a few united kingdom citizens is in struggle with the concept of variety. Brexit and immigration are mentioned later inside the essay. Critique of Marshall’s concept Marshall’s idea of citizenship has been criticised for being Anglocentric and evolutionist (Mann, 1987). Mann (1987) shows that emphasis ought to be positioned on information ruling magnificence interactions and anciens régimes in place of growing bourgeois and proletarian instructions, which has been the reputation quo in previous political studies (Mann, 1987). different critics discount Marshall’s concept of citizenship because of the truth that his theories have been developed within the mid 70’s (Bulmer & Rees, 1996) and the submit-global struggle II political dynamic is lots extraordinary than it's far today. whilst this can be the case, it does now not negate the truth that Marshall’s lived studies as a prisoner in Germany and as a social worker, presents a expertise and lifestyle that could only be subsumed from such stories. Such stories may be triangulated to the adversity th>GET ANSWER