Your task is to write a 1,500 word laboratory report that investigates the effectiveness of the Mind, Brain and Behaviour 2/B clinical psychology modules and practical classes in reducing public stigma about mental ill-health. This effectively means that the aim of your lab report is to address the research question:

“Is the MBB-B/2 clinical psychology program effective in reducing public stigma about mental illness?”

Throughout the semester, you will be given plenty of support as you commence on your lab report writing journey. Some general starting information is provided below. The detailed assignment brief, marking criteria, starting readings and other resources can be found in the.This assessment task requires you to demonstrate the following intended learning outcomes:

Describe, utilise and illustrate psychological research methods and data analysis
Discuss and critically evaluate psychological literature
Use, evaluate and analyse scientific methodology and enquiry
Critically discuss and debate competing and complementary perspectives of wellbeing
Write reports in an appropriate format and style for psychological science
Critically evaluate psychological literature and utilise research design and data analysis skills to communicate the outcomes of a psychological investigation
Discuss and justify the importance of individual differences within and between different cultural groups in designing appropriate psychological research.

Sample solution

Dante Alighieri played a critical role in the literature world through his poem Divine Comedy that was written in the 14th century. The poem contains Inferno, Purgatorio, and Paradiso. The Inferno is a description of the nine circles of torment that are found on the earth. It depicts the realms of the people that have gone against the spiritual values and who, instead, have chosen bestial appetite, violence, or fraud and malice. The nine circles of hell are limbo, lust, gluttony, greed and wrath. Others are heresy, violence, fraud, and treachery. The purpose of this paper is to examine the Dante’s Inferno in the perspective of its portrayal of God’s image and the justification of hell. 

In this epic poem, God is portrayed as a super being guilty of multiple weaknesses including being egotistic, unjust, and hypocritical. Dante, in this poem, depicts God as being more human than divine by challenging God’s omnipotence. Additionally, the manner in which Dante describes Hell is in full contradiction to the morals of God as written in the Bible. When god arranges Hell to flatter Himself, He commits egotism, a sin that is common among human beings (Cheney, 2016). The weakness is depicted in Limbo and on the Gate of Hell where, for instance, God sends those who do not worship Him to Hell. This implies that failure to worship Him is a sin.

God is also depicted as lacking justice in His actions thus removing the godly image. The injustice is portrayed by the manner in which the sodomites and opportunists are treated. The opportunists are subjected to banner chasing in their lives after death followed by being stung by insects and maggots. They are known to having done neither good nor bad during their lifetimes and, therefore, justice could have demanded that they be granted a neutral punishment having lived a neutral life. The sodomites are also punished unfairly by God when Brunetto Lattini is condemned to hell despite being a good leader (Babor, T. F., McGovern, T., & Robaina, K. (2017). While he commited sodomy, God chooses to ignore all the other good deeds that Brunetto did.

Finally, God is also portrayed as being hypocritical in His actions, a sin that further diminishes His godliness and makes Him more human. A case in point is when God condemns the sin of egotism and goes ahead to commit it repeatedly. Proverbs 29:23 states that “arrogance will bring your downfall, but if you are humble, you will be respected.” When Slattery condemns Dante’s human state as being weak, doubtful, and limited, he is proving God’s hypocrisy because He is also human (Verdicchio, 2015). The actions of God in Hell as portrayed by Dante are inconsistent with the Biblical literature. Both Dante and God are prone to making mistakes, something common among human beings thus making God more human.

To wrap it up, Dante portrays God is more human since He commits the same sins that humans commit: egotism, hypocrisy, and injustice. Hell is justified as being a destination for victims of the mistakes committed by God. The Hell is presented as being a totally different place as compared to what is written about it in the Bible. As a result, reading through the text gives an image of God who is prone to the very mistakes common to humans thus ripping Him off His lofty status of divine and, instead, making Him a mere human. Whether or not Dante did it intentionally is subject to debate but one thing is clear in the poem: the misconstrued notion of God is revealed to future generations.

 

References

Babor, T. F., McGovern, T., & Robaina, K. (2017). Dante’s inferno: Seven deadly sins in scientific publishing and how to avoid them. Addiction Science: A Guide for the Perplexed, 267.

Cheney, L. D. G. (2016). Illustrations for Dante’s Inferno: A Comparative Study of Sandro Botticelli, Giovanni Stradano, and Federico Zuccaro. Cultural and Religious Studies4(8), 487.

Verdicchio, M. (2015). Irony and Desire in Dante’s” Inferno” 27. Italica, 285-297.

Proposed Laboratory Report Structure

Introduction

  • Background on mental illness stigma: Discuss the prevalence and impact of public stigma on individuals with mental illness.
  • Theoretical framework: Explain the theoretical underpinnings of stigma reduction interventions, such as the social-cognitive model or the contact theory.
  • Research question: Clearly state the research question: “Is the MBB-B/2 clinical psychology program effective in reducing public stigma about mental illness?”
  • Hypothesis: Formulate a testable hypothesis based on the research question and theoretical framework.

Proposed Laboratory Report Structure

Introduction

  • Background on mental illness stigma: Discuss the prevalence and impact of public stigma on individuals with mental illness.
  • Theoretical framework: Explain the theoretical underpinnings of stigma reduction interventions, such as the social-cognitive model or the contact theory.
  • Research question: Clearly state the research question: “Is the MBB-B/2 clinical psychology program effective in reducing public stigma about mental illness?”
  • Hypothesis: Formulate a testable hypothesis based on the research question and theoretical framework.

Method

  • Participants: Describe the characteristics of the participants (e.g., age, gender, education level, cultural background).
  • Design: Explain the research design (e.g., experimental, quasi-experimental, correlational).
  • Measures: Outline the measures used to assess stigma reduction (e.g., stigmatizing attitudes scale, perceived social distance scale).
  • Procedure: Detail the steps involved in conducting the study, including the intervention (MBB-B/2 program) and data collection.

Results

  • Descriptive statistics: Present descriptive statistics for the relevant variables (e.g., mean, standard deviation).
  • Inferential statistics: Conduct appropriate statistical tests (e.g., t-test, ANOVA) to analyze the data.
  • Effect size: Calculate effect size to assess the magnitude of the intervention’s impact.

Discussion

  • Interpretation of results: Discuss the findings in relation to the research question and hypothesis.
  • Comparison with previous research: Compare the results to findings from other studies on stigma reduction interventions.
  • Limitations and future directions: Acknowledge the limitations of the study and suggest potential areas for future research.
  • Implications for practice: Discuss the implications of the findings for clinical practice and public health initiatives.

References

  • APA style: List all cited references in APA style.

Potential Research Design and Measures

Quasi-experimental design:

  • Pretest-posttest design: Measure stigma levels before and after the MBB-B/2 program.
  • Comparison group: Compare the program’s effectiveness to a control group that does not receive the intervention.

Measures:

  • Stigma measures:
    • Stigma Attitudes Scale (SAS)
    • Perceived Social Distance Scale (PSDS)
    • Community Attitudes and Beliefs Scale (CAB)
  • Program evaluation measures:
    • Program satisfaction survey
    • Knowledge and skills assessment

Data Analysis

  • Descriptive statistics: Calculate means, standard deviations, and frequencies for the relevant variables.
  • Inferential statistics: Use appropriate statistical tests, such as t-tests or ANOVAs, to compare pre- and post-intervention scores and to assess the impact of the program.
  • Effect size: Calculate effect size measures (e.g., Cohen’s d) to quantify the magnitude of the intervention’s impact.

Note: This is a general outline, and the specific details of your laboratory report will depend on the design and methods you choose. It is essential to consult with your instructor and refer to the assignment brief for guidance.

This question has been answered.

Get Answer