Use the article below, chapters 6-8 in your textbook, and the movie (“Miss Evers’ Boys”) to help guide your answers. Most of these questions do not have a right or wrong answer.
Was this study unethical in 1932?
Why or why not?
If you feel the study was ethical, was there a point when it became unethical?
Did the study provide valuable information?
How could the study have been done differently?
How do you think the subjects felt about their participation?
Did they think they were being treated unfairly?
Does the answer change over time (1930s, 1940s, 1950s, etc.)?
Should they have thought to question the MDs or Nurse Rivers?
What was the impact of recruiting at churches and schools on test subjects?
What was Nurse Rivers’ role in the project?
What is your opinion of her role?
Was Nurse Rivers negligent or did she commit malpractice?
Why or why not?
Think of a research question or study pertinent to a specific race, ethnicity, or culture.
How would you ensure the ethical recruitment of subjects?
Imagine you are the nurse in a modern-day, ethical, TSS-like study.
How would you use each of the five elements of cultural competence for the selected population?
Which modern-day, government agencies could be involved in a health-related research study?
How might they be involved?
Lack of diversity in clinical trials and research has increasingly been highlighted as a problem.
Hypothesize one reason (whether methodological, social, ethical, or other) why a lack of diversity has been a persistent issue in clinical trials and research.
What is one potential solution for your hypothesized reason?
Hermann, D. H. J. (2001). https://herzing.instructure.com/courses/12776/files/2347940/download?wrap=1
Vengeance Vengeance of the show "Hamlet" [Title] [Original] I will disclose how to utilize foil in the play. The four foils I use are as per the following. [As brought up in this class, the foil is a letter, not "between letters". Foil is a little character supporting the fundamental character. [Frag - 1] is an individual who is comparable or not the same as the fundamental character. [The foils ought to be diverse regardless of whether they are comparative. Laertes and Gertrude are only a couple of the individuals you are attempting to help. The awfulness of vengeance (once in a while called retribution dramatization, retribution show or bleeding misfortune) is a sort of hypothesis whose fundamental subject is the lethal aftereffect of vengeance and vengeance. American instructor Ashley H. Thorndiek formally reported the awfulness of vengeance in the 1902 article "Connection among Hamlet and contemporary retribution dramatization", recorded the advancement of the hero's retribution plan, and regularly killers and Avengers Brought about his own passing. This sort previously showed up in the early current British distributed by Thomas Kid's "Misfortune of Spain" in the second 50% of the sixteenth century. Early works, for example, Jasper Heywood 's Seneca (1560' s), Thomas Norton and Thomas Sackville 's play Gorbuduc (1561) were likewise viewed as a misfortune of vengeance. Different misfortunes of well known vengeance incorporate the awfulness of William Shakespeare's Hamlet (1599-1602), Titus Andronics (1588-1593), Thomas Middleton's Avengers (around 1606). In this investigation of vengeance and retribution of Elizabeth 's retribution, the two plays I see are the "Hamlet" of William Shakespeare and "The Tragedy of Avengers" of Thomas Middleton. After first observing the treatment of the writer 's Avengers' character, different characters in the play will deal with the Avengers. Their fundamental subject is like adhering to the competition, however the two dramatizations present a differentiating picture ... Hamlet - a misfortune of vengeance? Shakespeare's misfortune A puzzling arrangement of contemplations identified with vengeance of Hamlet makes this article an intriguing encounter. Ruth Nevo clarifies the vulnerability involved by the hero's most renowned monolog in Acts 3 and 4 in vengeance. I can not peruse the talk>GET ANSWER