Analyze a complex negotiation (work, personal, or historical)
To apply negotiation course concepts in your analysis.
Category Points % Description
Organization and Cohesiveness 70 35%
Central theme or purpose is clearly identifiable and well developed; introductory comments provide sufficient background on the topic and preview major points.
Subsequent sections develop and support the central theme of the paper.
Conclusions and recommendations follow logically from the body of the paper and bring closure to the paper.
Structure is clear, logical, and easy to follow; smooth transitions between paragraphs help maintain the flow of thought.
Meets minimum assigned length.
No major errors in spelling, punctuation, or grammar.
Paper is laid out effectively—uses headers and/or other reader-friendly tools.
Paper is professional in appearance and demonstrates attention to detail; tone of voice is appropriate to the audience (academic is preferred).
Content 120 40%
Addresses all aspects of the assignment in sufficient depth.
Analyzes and discusses negotiations concepts by extending and elaborating with realistic examples
Exhibits a substantive and perceptive ability in analyzing and discussing negotiation topic that is focus of paper.
Sample Solution
