1. Research on national infrastructure initiatives that have contributed to expanded broadband infrastructure and access in countries around the world. Identify several countries that have benefitted from national broadband infrastructure initiatives and briefly summarise the programs that they implemented.
2. Research on the current status of the Australian National Broadband Plan and other government-backed broadband access expansion programs in Australia. Briefly summarise the content of pending or recently passed legislation or executive initiatives to bring broadband Internet access to more Australian citizens.
3. Research on the “digital divide” within the Australia? Summarise which segments of the population are most at risk for being digital “have nots”. Identify efforts being made to address the digital divide within the Australia.
4. Research to identify the countries that have the lowest broadband and Internet access rates. What patterns can be observed across these countries? How can these low rates be explained?
5. Research on the benefits associated with high broadband access connections? What do users like most about higher connection speeds and how does it improve their lives?
Regular over the world we are being advised to be a decent individual, yet what does that extremely mean? Is a decent individual in America the same as a decent individual in socialist North Korea? I say yes; a great individual is dissimilar to the great subject whose ideals is pertinent to the administration in which they live; the great individual is a decent individual regardless of the administration while the great national is just illustrative of that which the state considers best. The great man can be great anyplace on the grounds that he takes after goodness, and discovers joy in that prudence. To outline this point I will initially characterize the great man then the terrible administration, lastly how a decent man fits into the awful administration. The Good Man Socrates, while under trial, clarified his meaning of a decent individual in invalidation of the charge that he was embarrassed about seeking after a risky occupation that had the likelihood of death. He reacted "You are incorrect, sir, in the event that you feel that a man who is any great whatsoever should consider the danger of last chance; he should look to this exclusive in his activities, regardless of whether what he does is correct or wrong, whether he is acting like a decent or an awful man"  Here we have an extremely straightforward clarification of the great man, he who does not fret about trivial individual needs but rather just whether his activities are great and just. Aristotle defines out an unmistakable limit between what he thinks about a decent man and a decent national. For Aristotle the great man is the man that demonstrations and lives idealistically and gets joy from that righteousness. Also, the great native acts to the best excellence of the state and every one of these things are very discrete, "The great national need not of need have the temperance which makes a decent man"  The partition is plainly clear, the way that what makes a decent native does not qualify somebody to be a decent individual. So being a decent individual does not mean you need to by affiliation be a decent national they are two particularly unique states, it is just in the best of administrations that the great individual is additionally the great resident. The idea of political decide is that control of those "comparative in stock and free"  As Aristotle contends if the goodness of a national is the ability to manage and be administered thus, at that point the excellence of the great man is additionally to have this limit in the best of administrations. The positive qualities in any creature or plant is the same as it is for people: that to be and act in congruity with the ideals of that species. In a way this is a human taking part in that which is most human, to act in agreement with soundness and uprightness. The positive qualities in acting with the ethicalness of a human is the flawlessness of that which must be depicted objectively such things as affection and equity. To act unto these things is to act with excellence yet there additionally stands breaking points to everything. To act with excessively incredible or too little accentuation in any demonstration is to disturb adjust and pulls the great man from his way of righteousness, a lot of adoration is fixation, too little hate either outrageous is unfortunate to the great man. The great man lives by the Golden Mean what isn't too in overabundance in either heading. To unite the meaning of a decent man, Socrates says he is a man who dependably thinks about his activities and acts in a decent and just way. Aristotle says a decent man acts unto righteousness and determines his bliss and joy from that temperance. So we have a man who is reasonable, prudent, and just. This man should now fit into a degenerate administration, an administration that does not take after every one of those things which make him a decent man. The Bad Regime There were six distinct classifications in which all administrations were set as characterized by both Socrates and Aristotle, those of oppression, government, theocracy, gentry, majority rules system and country. Of these administrations oppression, theocracy and majority rules system were all contrary and degenerate administrations on the grounds that the administering body whether it be a solitary individual, little gathering or the numerous separately just were controlling to their greatest advantage and not to the advantage of all. In the great administrations it is those same types of overseeing bodies yet they represent in light of a legitimate concern for the state all in all. Of the awful administrations Aristotle had proclaimed that oppression was the most unfortunate state as the nationals were decreased to just slaves. In a domineering government the represented are not taken care of but rather just used to encourage the objectives of the pioneer. The following two are characterized in a comparative way "men managing by reason of their riches, regardless of whether they be few or many,"  for a theocracy and characterizing a vote based system as "where the poor run the show."  To Aristotle a government was a contorted debasement of the great administration privileged, in the theocracy it isn't that couple of men administer it is that it is the well off class that standards making a state in which all influence dwells in the high society. .>GET ANSWER