Elaborate on what business problem the technology solves. Also, how does it help the organization achieve one or more of the following?
•Achieve operational excellence through higher levels of efficiency and productivity
•Create new products, services, and business models
•Raise revenue and profits while lowering costs by increasing customer and supplier intimacy
•Improve decision making for managers and employees
•Increase competitive advantages
•Insure survival caused by business environment changes
The World is Flat," by Thomas Friedman Distributed: 23rd March, 2015 Last Edited: second January, 2018 Disclaimer: This exposition has been put together by an understudy. This isn't a case of the work composed by our expert exposition authors. You can see tests of our expert work here. Any sentiments, discoveries, conclusions or suggestions communicated in this material are those of the writers and don't really mirror the perspectives of UK Essays. "The World is Flat," by Thomas Friedman, narratives the deluge of countless players on the worldwide financial stage that has made a solid power that is as of now influencing Americans. Friedman trusts that these approaching changes can possibly deliver both positive and negative outcomes. A case that shows the scope of Friedman's examination is his contention about the effect of the website air pocket and its possible bust. He proposes that in spite of the fact that the bust was terrible for a few financial specialists, it ended up being great in opening up worldwide markets. The overcapacity which delivered the bust likewise created low costs for broadcast communications, in this manner empowering players from littler monetary locales to partake in a diversion normally held for greater players. Friedman depicts a few cases of various firms in these locales that have risen to give innovation administrations to American business. One illustration, including an Indian firm that does essential expense form work for an American bookkeeping organization, mirrors his view that in spite of the fact that cost points of interest are imperative, the genuine criticalness are the focused extents and advancements made conceivable by this new innovation. A standout amongst the most imperative acumens of his book is that Americans ought to become acclimated to the way that the United States won't long remain the most grounded player on the field. From my perspective, the United States have severely required a decent measurement of lowliness, and these worldwide movements Friedman distinguishes guarantee to move us that way. While at the same time numerous sections point toward the approach of an arrangement of worldwide collaboration where nobody player claims predominance, numerous others expect a win-lose situation, in which Americans will be overwhelmed by the Indians and Chinese in the event that they don't start thinking responsibly. Friedman begins one of his parts with a short relating of the end result for America's past world strength in ball, portraying it as an incredible similitude for what is going on in the worldwide economy. Rather than getting a handle on the new evenness of the worldwide financial framework, he wishes for the transcendence days when the United States was still big boss. He composes again and again as though the main decision Americans have is to play and win, or to be washouts. This penchant is especially plainly obvious in his successive references to the assurance of high-stakes rivalry. "There is no opportunity to rest; we need to work harder; the Europeans are reprobate since they esteem having more occasions." Friedman composes as if this isn't a choice, yet there are decisions, or there should be. On the off chance that the present framework reduces a considerable lot of those decisions, maybe we should change the framework. Globalization is about effectiveness. In any case, as Friedman concedes, there's a whole other world to it than that. He considers the burdens and drawbacks in globalization in the section titled "The Great Sorting Out," yet despite everything he appears to be hesitant to genuinely investigate the outcomes. Friedman appears to be unwilling to recognize that the framework is essentially influenced by worldwide political structures or the nonappearance thereof. For instance, he specifies the requirement for the United States to build up a vitality autonomy arrangement, particularly to adapt to the normal immense increments in the interest for vitality by China and India. Yet, the greater part of this discourse happens in a section on the best way to kick off American science and innovation instruction so we can remain aggressive. Friedman completes a truly great job of recognizing globalization's effect on specialists. He perceives that the world isn't yet extremely level yet on the grounds that there are as yet a great many individuals who are not ready to contend in the worldwide market. In any case, he is as yet hesitant to point at basic issues. Friedman offers an assessment of how the non-vote based political structures of the Middle East do exclude a significant part of the populace who live there from the advantages of extension and change. I should feel that we require more than trust; The United States needs to create open strategies that have worldwide achieve, that verify that at any rate the key players are at the worldwide eating table can agreeably address a portion of the notable issues. On the off chance that the cost of these strategies creates lost proficiency, we ought to have a legitimate discussion about this exchange off, instead of expecting that productivity dependably wins.>GET ANSWER