We have learned that organizational change is a process rather than an event. It often starts with knowing what to change, continues through how to change, and then concludes with when to change. Using these steps as a foundation, present a three-to-five-page paper that addresses the following:
Research organizations in KSA that, in the past three years, have completed a major change to their organization (e.g., merged with or acquired another firm, expanded operations, significantly reduced staff, etc.).
Provide a brief summary of the organization and the reasons for the recent change.
Present the steps or process the organization followed, from the initiation of the change process to the implementation of the change. Which of the several frameworks from the textbook did they use or do you think they used to analyze organizational dynamics?
Discuss the stakeholders who were included in the process and indicate what their roles were.
Finally, discuss the key processes/strategies which were successful, the key processes/strategies which were not successful, and advice or suggestions you would offer (based on what you have learned thus far in this course) which may result in a more successful change initiative in the future. Which of the several frameworks from the textbook would you suggest they use to analyze organizational dynamics?
tapes that trained the language to their kids, rather than conversing with them. A particular ceremony was pursued for each exercise. The seats at a similar spot, severe body act and the voice of a German teacher would for Nancy Sommes' folks ensure the "right approach to learn". Following a similar standard of the "right way" to do anything her folks utilized a guide for their voyaging, adhering to carefully the guidelines given, spending no more or no less time at every setting, making no extra stops. As though they didn't have their very own voice, as though they couldn't decide for themselves what to do or not to do, or even how to do it. Her folks gave her the universe of two choices: the correct way or the incorrect way. Along these lines, both our journalists are affected from power. Rich, from one perspective, from the expert of men journalists in a man commanded society, and then again Sommers impacted from parental specialist. At the point when Sommer as a parent herself intuitively grasped that equivalent rule and anticipated it to her own tyke, she discovered that, conflictingly to her, her little girl had her very own voice. Nancy Sommer had camouflaged herself and holed up behind the title "Specialist", perusing and changing, investigating the learning of different authors. In any case, she kept herself out of her own composition, being missing from her own work. Much the same as her folks holed up behind the tapes and the aides and prohibited themselves from their lives, making and living another person's encounters, she took cover behind the specialist of an "analyst" and utilized other individuals' work to legitimize her announcements. Not even once did she utilize her own encounters to help her announcements. Another similitude among Rich and Sommers exists in their situation on the job of the essayist in regard to custom. Rich is confronting creative convention, of the manner in which authors expound on ladies, their picture and how she as essayist can cop with every one of her jobs: that of a customary female and of an essayist. As a spouse and a mother Rich thought that it was elusive extra time, to think, to address, to envision; spare time that customarily ladies never have as they are fundamentally stacked with the obligations of bringing up youngsters and thinking about the family. Yet, following the customary method for performing female obligations is in direct clash with the principle component of composing: creative mind. Day by day obligations, set aside any innovative movement, that can be placed in words. Adrienne Rich felt the contention between these two jobs. She thought herself as an essayist or as a mother. The decision of "either" and "or" was later supplant by "and". She looked for approaches to grasp the two pieces of her life, the innovative one and the maternal one. In like manner Sommers faces again convention, yet of another sort. Scholarly custom is full with either/or sentences: the understudies are either educated to compose scholastic or individual expositions. This custom appears to make an assurance, a deception of control to the scholastic network. Everybody knows their precise job and what they should do. In any case, Nancy Sommers recognizes the fac>GET ANSWER