Healthcare is a complicated system that includes unique economic processes, regulatory requirements, and quality indicators that are not found in traditional business settings. Therefore, developing unique skill sets relating to organizational leadership and interprofessional team development is essential for leaders within the healthcare industry at any level. As the complexity within the healthcare industry increases, it is important to understand the comprehensive approach to patient care management across the continuum and how the concepts of organizational leadership and team development support leaders in creating a patient-centric environment.
provide a framework through which you can experience and understand the unique leadership concepts within healthcare and understand the implications of business and regulatory requirements in providing patient-centered care. You will use a system theory or a change theory, self-assessment tools, and team development concepts to design a strategy to increase patient-centered care. Using leadership concepts and theories, you will ensure a sustainable model of healthcare delivery throughout the changing healthcare system that considers future trends, evidence-based practice, and regulatory expansion.
A. Analyze how business practices, regulatory requirements, and reimbursement impact patient-family-centered care within a healthcare organization.
B. Complete the attached “Patient-and Family-Centered Care Organizational Self-Assessment Tool” (PFCC) for a healthcare organization.
Note: The PFCC tool is a subjective tool used to assess the organization you have chosen.
- Describe the healthcare setting you used in the PFCC.
Note: Please include the type of facility, the services provided by the facility and the diverse ethnic groups cared for by the facility.
- Using the completed PFCC tool, describe the strengths and weaknesses of the organization for each domain.
C. Identify one area of improvement from the weaknesses identified in part B2.
- Create a strategy to increase patient-centeredness in the organization by addressing the weakness from part C.
a. Discuss how you would apply either system theory or change theory in the development of your strategy to address the chosen weakness.
Note: The strategy should include the development of a multi-disciplinary team and how patient-family centered care can be improved.
- Discuss the financial implications of implementing this strategy.
- Discuss the methods you will use to evaluate the effectiveness of your strategy.
D. Create a multidisciplinary team by identifying the following:
• potential members that will assist you in implementing the identified strategy
• The role of each team member
- Discuss how cultural diversity within the team supports patient-centered, culturally competent care.
- Using one of the leadership theories below, discuss the leadership style you would utilize in developing your team:
• transactional leadership
• transformational leadership
• emotional leadership
• traditional leadership
- Discuss how the team will work together to implement the strategy to address the weakness identified in part C1.
- Describe how the team will communicate the identified strategy and intended outcomes to the healthcare organization.
- Describe a specific tool you could use to develop the team’s self-assessment skills.
convictions. Here Descartes utilizes the vindictive evil presence psychological study. Gassendi reprimanded this hypothesis saying that Descartes could simply have viewed the past information as dubious (refered to by Norman) rather than obliterating everything. It isn't important to consider everything as false. He felt that such a methodology persuades the human personality that there is a villain who deceives us. It is less difficult to concede the shortcoming of human instinct. Gassendi called attention to the all inclusive and hyperbolic nature of the Method of Doubt. Descartes contends that it is beyond the realm of imagination to expect to free ourselves of the considerable number of blunders that the human personality has been absorbed. He immovably accepts that all inclusive and hyperbolic nature is important for the Method of Doubt to succeed. Descartes in his contention to obliterate everything and start once more applies the general character and gives the similarity of a bushel brimming with apples. To choose and hold the great ones and dispose of the awful ones, it is more astute to purge the crate, at that point select the great ones and keep them in the bin. He feels this is a superior and more straightforward route than selecting the spoiled ones from the bushel loaded with apples. He has faith in first dismissing all convictions as though they were false and afterward after cautious examination, receive just the ones, which are valid. One rotten one can decay the entire container so if we somehow happened to choose the awful ones, there is each probability of disregarding one rotten one. Then again, in the event that the entire container is first purged and, at that point the great ones set back, we can make certain of just embracing reality. Descartes' technique for uncertainty, as establishment of information seems more successful than what has been proposed by Gassendi. At the point when the bushel is thoroughly unfilled, it tends to be cleaned and after that new, great apples picked and set in the crate. It is an a lot quicker process than refuting the terrible. Besides, when the container is vacant, the stains abandoned by the spoiled apples can be seen and cleaned, which is beyond the realm of imagination when the rotten ones are selected from the parcel. His contention to dispose of everything as false depends on his contention that the psyche accepts on whatever it sees through the physical eye. He didn't accept that anything ought to be left to creative mind. This has a sound premise, as the brain can't envision what it has not seen. So as to help that every earlier conviction aren't right, he talked about three phases – the sense, dreams and the insidious evil presence speculation. Descartes attests that these don't have the ability to distort what we 'appear' to see. What we see through the sense misdirect us. We can't start with uncertainty. Descartes even goes to the degree of confirming that even the outside world that we see is a deception, a fantasy and henceforth false. The enquiry needs to begin subsequent to disposing of every single such discernment. The following contention that emerges is whether the break from hyperbolic gives a good establishment to learning? This can be clarified by a similarity of a structure, which requires the utilization of a bulldozer to annihilate it. A light bulldozer would make the ground seem relentless. Thus, a greater bulldozer is progressively viable, which means the more hyperbolic the uncertainty, the better it is. As per Descartes, the Evil Genius Doubt is the most dominant uncertainty. This malicious virtuoso causes us to accept the false as obvious. For example, the straightforward realities like 2+3=5 or that a square has just four sides, are understandable. For individuals to know, comprehend, and acknowledge these facts, they must be solidly grounded notwithstanding the most dominant questions. The shrewd virtuoso attempts to shake even such hyperbolic questions. Individuals additionally immovably prevent the presence from securing God. Descartes accepts that the Evil Genius Doubt is only one of the variables that can inspire the hyperbolic uncertainty. The fundamental uncertainty is that the human personality is imperfect, and the psyche knows that it has been misshaped in spite of God having given a nature to go to him. The human personality continues recalling all the past episodes and dreams, and gives them the privilege to consume the brain. It is difficult to acknowledge that the world we see regular is a deception. It is just through profound thoughtfulness and a solid will that an individual can acknowledge reality that God exists and all else is false. He must be fixed in this conviction and touch base at the information of truth. He needs to excite himself from the profound sleep of lie. The more hyperbolic the uncertainty, the brain is acti>GET ANSWER