The hospice nurse sat with Ann’s husband, Ben. Ann was resting quietly as the increased dosage of IV pain medication gradually reached its therapeutic level. Ben turned his head and slowly turned, looking out the room’s only window. As he glanced up, a small flicker of light caught his breath. It was a shooting star. A tear fell from the corner of his eye and he turned to Ann. The nurse sensed that something significant to Ann and Ben was unfolding. Shuffling to Ann’s bedside, he took her small fragile hand in his. These hands had rocked cradles, burped babies, and groomed the horses she loved to ride. Gently holding her hand, he turned to the nurse. “She would ride like the wind was chasing her.” Looking back to Ann his voice broke; choking back tears “Ann, Ann I saw Jessie…Jessie is calling.” Ben turned “Jessie was our daughter. She died having a baby that was too big. When she died it was a pitch-black night. Cold, so cold, the baby died too, a little boy, named him Abe, Jr. after Jessie’s husband. I took Ann outside so she could cry to God above and there in this dark sky we saw two falling stars…together…just falling. We knew it had to be Jessie and Abe…two angels to light up the night.” Ben turned back as a deep sigh escaped from Ann’s lips. A soft smile remained as she joined Jessie and Abe.
Based on this case study how would the nurse actualize Parse’s theory of Human Becoming?
What are characteristics of a human becoming nurse? What are strengths and weaknesses to this theory of nursing?
What challenges exist for healthcare institutions to switch to this nursing approach?
How might Parse’s understanding of transcendence guide the nurse, as Ann’s death became a reality to Ben?
From the nursing theories we have discussed, what additional theory would you apply to this case study? Develop a plan of care to include both nursing theories (be specific and provide reasons)
what's more, examined (Hamby, 2014, p. 151). Her greatest study of this is most analysts will utilize obsolete scales, similar to the Conflict Tactics Scale (CTS), that have not been progressed or experienced support since they previously surfaced. Accordingly, scientists might be estimating comparable practices like tormenting, network savagery, or family brutality that score also to IPV practices on self-report scales. Hamby thinks about a wide scope of savage acts as rape, irritated and basic attack, theft, manslaughter, and private accomplice crime in proof against sexual orientation symmetric examples of IPV. She proceeds to infer that individual paces of these rough demonstrations are most executed by men and that these discoveries ought not be overlooked when evaluating examples of IPV crosswise over sex. She recommends instead of utilizing default gauges, a dynamic methodology is see sex designs crosswise over various types of viciousness to additionally assess an increasingly reasonable relationship of sexual orientation dissimilarity in IPV and along these lines, this data ought to be joined for future works in the conceptualization of IPV (p. 152). As we find in the five extra articles, lacking conceptualization might be an all-encompassing issue crosswise over writing. The general inquiries and speculations that drive the examinations that analyze practices of IPV are grounded in similitudes, however explicit hypotheses are absent in more than one investigation inspected in this audit. As such, every one of the five of the investigations under assessment broke down various angles and speculations behind IPV, which thus, uncovers this field to be sweeping in nature. There seems, by all accounts, to be agreement that IPV incorporates both rough physical and mental maltreatment, bringing about damaging results for those included. The majority of the examination questions assessed in the five extra investigations relate to the contributing variables and potential indicators of IPV practices to endeavor to all the more likely clarify the course and examples of these connections crosswise over sexual orientation. To start, Edwards, Mattingly, Dixon, and Banyard (2014) acquainted the social complication hypothesis with clarify IPV in their investigation. The social disruption system is intended to give a clarification of the job of financial and neighborhood compositional factors on wrongdoing (p. 199). In spite of the fact that this system has as of late been applied to the investigation of IPV, Edwards et al. endeavor to interface ruined networks and higher paces of IPV and onlooker intercession of IPV with saw aggregate adequacy. Along these lines, Edwards et al. develop the social disorder system. IPV was conceptualized>GET ANSWER