STEP 1: To prepare for class on Wednesday, 9/18, watch Parts I & II of Spike Lee’s 2006 documentary When the Levees Broke: A Requiem in Four Acts below:
When the Levees Broke, Parts I & II (Links to an external site.)
STEP 2: As you watch, list what you see in the film in the order that you see it. What do we see first? What do we see next?
This list will give a sense of what happens in the film and when, but it will also give you an index of the evidence that Spike Lee uses to make his argument about what Hurricane Katrina and its aftermath reveal about the United States in the 21st century.
STEP 3: To get credit for this work, upload your list to this assignment AND bring it with you to class on Wednesday.
Structural and BIM Technology Chapter by chapter guide (Jump to) Official Summary 1.0 Introduction 2.0 St Johns College and Respond lodging Development 3.0 Evaluation of Legal issues 4.0 Conservation and Protected structures 5.0 Duty of Care 6.0 Scope of Works 7.0 Boundary Disputes 8.0 Reflective Learning Catalog Table of Cases Donoghue v Stevenson  AC 562 Hymany [Pontoon] Ltd - v-Galkil Ltd t/an Impact Developments IEHC 188 Dempsey and Anor - v-Waterford Corporation  IEHC 55 (29 February 2008) Cite as:  IEHC 55 Rundown of Images Fig 1 – http://www.mythenconstruction.ie/wp-content/transfers/2014/09/St-Johns-College-Waterford.jpg Fig 2 – http://waterfordireland.tripod.com/stjohnscollege.jpg Fig 3 – http://maps.osi.ie/publicviewer/#V1,661050,611123,7,10 Fig 4 – http://maps.osi.ie/publicviewer/#V1,661050,611123,7,14 Fig 5 – http://maps.osi.ie/publicviewer/#V1,661050,611123,7,11 Fig 6-http://waterfordcouncil.maps.arcgis.com/applications/Solutions/s2.html?appid=c6d45bb300e6463db7e9c6bd1df43441 Fig 7 – http://waterfordcouncil.maps.arcgis.com/applications/Solutions/s2.html?appid=c6d45bb300e6463db7e9c6bd1df43441 Fig 8 – http://waterfordcouncil.maps.arcgis.com/applications/Solutions/s2.html?appid=c6d45bb300e6463db7e9c6bd1df43441 Official Summary This archive will concentrate on recognizing extending and investigating lawful issues which might be experienced in regards to the lodging advancement by Respond in organization with Department of Environment, Local Government and Communities. The undertaking is to comprise of 21 lofts in the upper degree of the current St Johns College building and 36 new condos in a recently fabricate square which will be situated on the school site at Richardson's Folly, Waterford. Mythen development will be the temporary workers on location for the task which began in December 2013. The legitimate issues which will be focal point of the venture are Conservation and Protected structures, Duty of Care, Scope of works and Boundary debates. Every region will be sketched out inside the record and besides developed so as to plot techniques for settling such issues. Legitimate writing with respect to both development and general law will be utilized as will proper case law so as to broaden the extension and give an increasingly broad perspective on the issues. 1.0 Introduction The fundamental point of this record is to recognize, assess and develop "the principle legitimate issues prone to emerge in connection to the react lodging affiliation improvement at St Johns College, Richardson's Folly, and Waterford." The report will investigate lawful issues identified with Architecture which may happen or be experienced by both an Architect and Architectural Technician on location during the term of the task referenced previously. In assessing these issues, past lawful cases related to the subjects will be explored so as to give a more clear perspective on the issues being referred to, to the important laws and how these issues can be settled. Direction will likewise be given as far as how these issues can be managed and furthermore how they can be predicted and disposed of at a beginning time later on as to maintain a strategic distance from any questions between all gatherings engaged with the undertaking whether these debates occur on or off site. Before the breakdown of the issues which may emerge a short review of St Johns College, the historical backdrop of the school and a breakdown of the task embraced by Respond will be laid out so as to give a more extensive extent of the venture in general. 2.0 St Johns College and Respond lodging Development St Johns College is a Catholic theological school which as referenced, is situated at Richardson's Folly in Waterford. The school which was established in 1880 for the Waterford/Lismore bishopric. The school was comprised of two schools the first being an old style school kept running by Rev. Thomas Flynn and the second an Academy kept running by Dr. Geoffrey Keating. The College shut in shut in 1999 because of absence of movement and livelihoods with the rest of the understudies moved. In 2007 it was reported that Respond Housing relationship in organization with Department of Environment, Local Government and Communities had gained segments of the site which is a secured structure of roughly 3900sq.m with a proposition of redeveloping the structure into social lodging. Mythen development started takes a shot at site in December 2013. The improvement as it stands is to comprise of the retrofit/redevelopment of the current school building which is to incorporate 21 lofts on the upper floors with another structure situated nearby which will house 36 new condos (2400 sq.m approx.) the redevelopment will likewise incorporate public offices. The following are pictures of the proposed and existing structures with 3 OSI maps demonstrating the site area and the proposed new site. http://www.mythenconstruction.ie/wp-content/transfers/2014/09/St-Johns-College-Waterford.jpg http://waterfordireland.tripod.com/stjohnscollege.jpg Proposed improvement – Fig 1 Existing structure – Fig2 OSI Site plan – Fig 3 Existing structure Fig 4 Proposed new site Fig 5 3.0 Evaluation of Legal issues Coming up next are the lawful issues which will be distinguished, assessed and developed. As referenced these issues will be separated so as to distinguish how these issues can emerge, how they can be managed and how they can be counteracted later on. Past lawful cases, Legal writing with respect to development and general legitimate assets will be utilized to assist the thinking behind such issues and how they may emerge. Preservation and Protected structures Obligation of Care Extent of Works Trespass Limit Dispute 4.0 Conservation and Protected structures The main zone to be investigated is preservation and secured structures. As the fundamental school building is an ensured structure this without uncertainty will be an issue related with a venture. At the point when a venture is attempted which includes preservation or that of a secured structure it is fundamental to have a planner who has some involvement in protection or managing ensured structures. As expressed in the Irish Planning and Development act 2000 "Every proprietor and every occupier will, to the degree reliable with the rights and commitments emerging out of their individual advantages in a secured structure or a proposed ensured structure, guarantee that the structure, or any component of it which adds to its exceptional compositional, recorded, archeological, imaginative, social, logical, social or specialized intrigue, isn't endangered". With regards to the announcement above it is significant for a protection review to be completed on the structure before beginning so as to guarantee no piece of the structure is imperiled. In the event that with the task being referred to there is have to either for an expansion or erasure an expansion as expressed by the Irish Planning and Development act 2000 "on account of an expansion, the expansion is important or alluring so as to ensure a structure, or part of a structure, of unique engineering, authentic, archeological, aesthetic, social, logical, social or specialized intrigue, regardless of whether a proposal has been made under area 53" On the other turn as far as a cancellation the 2000 demonstration states "on account of a cancellation, the assurance of the structure or part is never again justified" In request to maintain a strategic distance from any debates or rupture of guidelines it is basic to complete work on a secured structure with a high level of consideration. It is to everybody's greatest advantage to guarantee that an ensured structure is very much kept up and safeguarded in like manner which thus can wipe out any potential issues which might be experienced during the term of development organize. 5.0 Duty of Care Obligation of consideration can be characterized as individual or individual's duty to act with a similar degree of consideration, consideration and circumspection as an individual in a comparative circumstance when completing a demonstration, guaranteeing that there is no conceivably of risk or peril. For instance an originator ought to endeavor to accomplish a similar degree of competency as a fashioner inside a similar order when doing works guaranteeing that he has completed the related works with a sensible measure of consideration. For instance if an Architect neglects to agree to building guidelines this can be viewed as a rupture of his/her obligation of consideration given that they have neglected to guarantee the wellbeing of the structure inhabitants once works have been finished inability to conform to such guidelines may likewise prompt potential harm to the building. When it goes to any sort of structure venture there will consistently be an obligation of consideration whether it be to the structure itself, to the customer and the people taking a shot at the site. Both the temporary worker and Architect hold an obligation of consideration as far as the proposed advancement being fit for reason and furthermore that the development has been completed in a skillful house including the drawings which were set up for the venture. To give a model as far as obligation of consideration being ruptured by one gathering if the contractual worker feels as if the Architect is bumbling and that his/her drawings are not very a standard in which can be utilized to effectively and securely complete the related works the temporary worker may feel that the Architect is in break of their obligation of consideration and the other way around if the contract based worker/developer isn't building the structure in a sheltered and adequate way then the draftsman may feel the manufacturer is in break of his/her obligation of consideration. As far for instance of obligation of consideration outside of development the instance of instance of Donoghue v Stevenson  AC 562 is a fitting model as it came down to that it was the makers obligation of consideration to guarantee the item was fit for human utilization and when it in this manner was found to not be fit for human utilization it was demonstrated that it was a rupture of obligation of consideration on the produces side.  To guarantee there are no questions with respect to obligation of consideration it is essential that>GET ANSWER