Identify and summarize at least two themes that run through the InTASC standards.
Select a standard and a theme and then relate how that theme is represented in the standard that you chose.
How can teachers work collaboratively with others to use a variety of data and information (and standards) to meet the learning needs of students?
"A companion I know, who's an Independent voter and who had never made an online battle commitment, as of late went on the web and gave $50 to the Obama crusade. Inside two minutes she got a thank-you for the commitment and an affirmation that somebody in Ohio had coordinated her commitment as a method for likewise saying much obliged. Two minutes from that point forward, she got another email from the crusade inquiring as to whether she, as well, would coordinate the $50 commitment of another giver, and whether her email address could be shared with the goal that the new contributor could express gratitude toward her for her match. You get the photo." The strategy of requesting that supporters simply give a little was motivated. Not exclusively did it convey countless – more than two million (Stelter, 2008).– yet as by far most did not contribute the greatest sum, Obama could keep on asking them for another 'little' gift over and over as his crusade went on. Moreover, such a demand is one, to the point that he can make again once the Presidential race against McCain starts vigorously. As The Times pronounces, "This is a cash machine dissimilar to some other" (Sullivan, 2008). Obama's strategy for internet gathering pledges implied that it limited the measure of time he really must be available at occasions and meals. In February 2008 the Obama battle raised $55m ($45m from the web) without Barack Obama expressly facilitating a solitary pledge drive (Sullivan, 2008). There are constantly numerous requests on a competitors' chance amid a crusade, so the chance to invest less energy attempting to cajole individuals into exhausting their wallets and satchels and more on taking a shot at arrangement, talks and suchlike is priceless. Not exclusively were the requests on the applicants time reduced however the battle group before long found that gathering pledges occasions were jumping up unexpectedly, free of any official association, as Andrew Sullivan (2008) clarifies: "This spring, numerous companions who had never already been occupied with governmental issues all of a sudden educated me concerning their Obama pledge drives. I was paralyzed by their activism. Nobody had asked them. They were masterminding the gatherings or exhibitions or social occasions through Facebook and MySpace, with no formal administration from Obama central station. Similarly as Obama's most acclaimed web recordings were never authorized by the applicant – they were made and dispersed immediately online – so his gathering pledges started to go up against its very own existence… There is no doubt in my mind this is the eventual fate of political association and raising money" Joshua Green (2008) saw direct how Obama supporters ended up engaged to get associated with a significant way. After visiting the neighborhood Obama central command in Silicone Valley, Green observed it to be "stuck with volunteers" who were tuning in to an Obama discourse requesting that volunteers telephone faltering agents in Iowa to endeavor to inspire them to back him. Before long these volunteers did precisely that. The following day, Obama had increased nine agents. What struck Green most about this scene was that: "that the central station is completely independent—not a dime has originated from the Obama battle. Rather, everything from the PCs to the phones to the doughnuts and espresso—even the building's rent and utilities—is client produced, organized and paid for by nearby volunteers. It is one of a few such cases the nation over, and no other battle has assembled anything that can coordinate this level of independence" As Obama's online chief Joe Rospars states, "the thought is to give them the apparatuses and have them go out and do this all alone" (refered to in Green, 2008) Another unmistakable preferred standpoint to the long range interpersonal communication framework was that it permitted the battle group to gather a wide cluster of individual data with respect to Obama's help. This information went a long ways past the standard statistic pointers normally used in races. The ensuing information mining of the data enabled Obama's group to once more boost crusade commitments, and in addition giving them a more grounded, more sorted out nearness at the grass-roots level. After visiting My.BarackObama.com you are incited to either sign in to your record or join on the off chance that you are not as of now a current client. This implies, not at all like with customary competitor sites, to get to the full scope of administrations you should give your email address and also your postal district. Other individual data can likewise be volunteered. Because of his web nearness Barack Obama has more than five million individuals joined to his email list (Madden, 2008). What is critical anyway isn't how much information was accessible to Obama's kin, yet rather how it was utilized. All things considered, an excessive amount of data can be overpowering; how this data was used, the manner by which it was separated and 'cut up' implied that the crusade could accomplish more prominent proficiency and capacity in a significantly more streamlined way. Focusing on the correct statistic is urgent, there is little point in pouring in cash and time endeavoring to select voters who are by tendency Clintonites (or in the pending Presidential crusade, conservative Republicans). By knowing a voter's age, sexual orientation, race, family wage, scholastic capabilities and suchlike, anticipating their identity wanting to vote in favor of (or to be sure on the off chance that they are probably going to vote by any means) is made all the more less demanding. Not exclusively did Obama's kin gather information from their own particular supporters, they likewise utilized data that was at that point in general society space, for example, statistics records and voter enrollment records (Madden, 2008). Factual programming and statistical surveying instruments utilized as a part of the corporate space were then used to separate patterns or regular factors that demonstrated whether somebody would probably vote Republican or Democrat, for Hilary or Obama. While such research can't ensure to anticipate a person's voting conduct it allows for more taught surmises. For instance, Obama's battle group would realize that individuals from the American Civil Liberties Union would probably vote in favor of their hopeful than individuals from the National Rifle Association. This information mining process implied that time and cash could be all the more proficiently focused on and diverted. In the Iowa assembly the Obama group utilized complex following systems to right off the bat distinguish supporters, at that point hold their help. Web sources were utilized to assemble mailing records in light of political, expert and individual interests. To assemble data o voters his group trawled informal communication destinations, and MySpace and Facebook as well as more specialty locales that provided food for office experts, children of post war America, African-Americans, Latinos, Asians and the gay network (Slevin, P. and Vargas, J.A., 2007) Information digging for political closures is just the same old thing new. Amid the 2004 Election George W. Shrub utilized purchaser information to target potential new supporters (Madden, 2008). The Democrats utilized comparable data to target affluent givers (Madden, 2008). The distinction with the Obama crusade is that his group utilized unmistakably point by point data in quest for far more extensive achieving points. For Obama's kin even data that may at first appear to have practically zero pertinence was used to accumulate favorable position. The time at which individuals on the mailing list read the messages sent to them was checked and if a steady example developed, they would dependably send them around then of day. As Michael Bassik, a Democratic expert with internet promoting organization MSHC Partners clarifies, "the negligible advantage of sending a few people an email at 2 o'clock versus 3 o'clock versus 4 o'clock probably won't bode well [at first] yet once you begin getting an email list that is 3 million, 4 million, or 10 million individuals, expanding the profits for a raising money email by 5 or 10 percent implies extra returns of tens or a huge number of dollars" (refered to in Madden, 2008). A client of My.BarackObama.com would have their utilization followed so it would be known how frequently they visited and when and in this manner their duty to the battle could be estimated. All individuals – almost a million people (Stelter, 2008) – were solicited to finish a nitty gritty study from their voting propensities, past commitments to political battles, the political gatherings and issues they think most about and if and when they visited church (Madden, 2008). The greater part of this data was then examined to manufacture a profile of an Obama supporter. This data was then put to utilize by means of customary electioneering strategies. Neighborhoods in which the information demonstrated the most astounding level of likely Obama supporters were broadly solicited. This combination of old and new techniques is the thing that made Obama's information mining a win. Online data was gotten together with disconnected information, everything ended up coordinated, as the accompanying illustration given by Andrew Sullivan (2008) appears: "Obama's trademark mass revitalizes… aren't simply media draws. Everybody who needed to get into the 75,000-in number rally in Portland… needed to give an email address. When they got back home from the occasion, an email was sitting tight for them, approaching them for cash or for referrals to different companions, and urging them to shape "partiality gatherings" to spread the system more extensive and more extensive" The data gathered from information mining was joined with the upsides of long range interpersonal communication by Obama's group when clients of My.BarackObama.com were urged to help the battle by soliciting in their own territories. They were provided with data that disclosed to them which of their neighbors were destined to vote Democrat and who in their general vicinity was enlisted as an autonomous voter (Stelter, 2008).>GET ANSWER