Select an organization and program that involves some sort of intervention (e.g. prevention programs, education programs). You may choose any nonprofit organization that you have access to program information (i.e., brochures, website, mission, goals, previous evaluations, data collected during fieldwork).
What is the major social issue the program is attempting to address?
Who is the program for?
What is the history of the program?
What is the sociopolitical context of the program?
Mendelssohn’s appreciation of Judaism. For Kant, Judaism significantly depends on a materialist world; it's far a religion that utilises people for its very own benefits, depriving them of freedom and enlightenment. The differences among Kant and Mendelssohn are intensified even greater while the philosophers speak the dawning of the age of enlightenment. according to Moses Mendelssohn, the era of enlightenment might hardly come, due to the fact in the course of their records human beings have moved onward and backward, stopping similarly improvement of humankind. Moses considers that an individual individual is able to gather a positive stage of enlightenment; however, whole humankind creates consistent boundaries and laws, either religious or kingdom, which preclude the technique of enlightenment. In his analysis of enlightenment Kant expresses a special perspective; especially, he claims that humankind constantly progresses in its improvement. even though the philosopher acknowledges the lifestyles of some barriers and limitations, he factors on the truth that these limits might also most effective sluggish down the method of enlightenment, however they can in no way completely wreck it. As Kant regards enlightenment as a non-stop progress, he realises that human beings, utilizing reason and obtaining a few know-how, will preserve to attempt for enlightenment. And it's miles this aspiration for profound understanding and understanding of human life that Kant interprets as enlightenment. in this regard, Kant thinks that it is surely crucial to draw a parallel among beyond and gift generations, analysing various levels in their improvement. however, Kant well-knownshows an apparent obstacle to the progress of enlightenment; as human beings generally examine best separate components of the universe, they fail to mix these factors into a whole photo. because of this incapability, human beings may additionally find it difficult to steer each different and completely combine into the method of enlightenment. however, despite these apparent variations, each Kant and Mendelssohn of their interpretation of enlightenment make attempts to maintain the ideas of rationalism without an open rejection of the lifestyles of God. that is in particular actual in regard to Moses Mendelssohn who does no longer venture the existence of God, however opposes the present spiritual laws that create the unchanging fact for believers, depriving them of the opportunity to obtain enlightenment. accordingly, each Mendelssohn and Kant define enlightenment thru the evaluation of the practical methods to gain enlightenment; however, unlike Mendelssohn, Kant bases his definition on positive negations, along with ‘dependence’, ‘immaturity’, ‘shortage of courage’. on this context, Kant demonstrates that step one in acquiring enlightenment is the elimination of the whole lot that deprives human beings of reason and freedom; handiest overcoming the first level of removal, a person is able to proceed to the second one degree of acquisition. Analysing the definitions of the Enlightenment through Immanuel Kant and Moses Mendelssohn, the essay has found out that Kant’s interpretation of enlightenment is based totally at the concept of freedom and specially deals with someone’s capacity to conquer immaturity and inner fears. Discussing enlightenment, particularly via spiritual factors, Kant offers two predominant standards that constitute his vision – ‘non-public’ and ‘public’ utilization of reason. Mendelssohn’s interpretation of enlightenment displays a near connection between enlightenment and way of life, however the philosopher’s distinction of ‘civil enlightenment’ and ‘human enlightenment’ demonstrates the distinction between someone as a citizen and someone as a man or women. despite the fact that each Kant and Mendelssohn adhere to public and private components of their understanding of enlightenment, their interpretations extensively differ. especially, Kant considers that the public usage of motive ought to be kept unfastened, whilst the non-public utilization need to be uncovered to certain barriers; unlike Kant, Mendelssohn thinks that during some instances the public utilization should be constrained, or in any other case it could produce a few bad outcomes for society. on this regard, Kant’s definition worries a practical aspect of the problem, although it is based on the ideas of ‘escape’, for instance, get away from inner fears in the direction of maturity. at the contrary, Mendelssohn’s definition is created on a theoretical foundation and interprets enlightenment via the principles of ‘success’. but, both Immanuel Kant and Moses Mendelssohn point at the necessity of freedom within the Enlightenment, despite the truth that Kant tends to preserve the identity>GET ANSWER